Channel
@atTamuil
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
3,400subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002208069703 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @atTamuil |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/atTamuil |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 3,400 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 3,400 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
323 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 147 | 45.5% | |
| 👍 | 136 | 42.1% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 8.67% | |
| ✍ | 7 | 2.17% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 1.55% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 323reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2025 to 16 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @atTamuil. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 April 2025 to 16 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Касательно сделки Ас-Салям подробно можете почитать в этой работе, очень подробная и полезная. А разницу между этой сделкой и продажей того, чем человек не владеет скоро обсудим ин шаа Аллах.
❤10👍1
Разбор сделки: «Ас-салям». بِسۡمِ ٱللَّهِ ٱلرَّحۡمَـٰنِ ٱلرَّحِيمِ Как торговать товаром которого нет в наличии по предоплате? В этой работе вы можете найти ответ. Книга состоит из 3 частей: 1. Определение сделки “ас-салям”, ее правовое значение и мудрость. 2. Столпы сделки «ас-салям». 3. Положения, связанные со сделкой “ас-салям” Читайте и распространяйте. https://t.me/makeev_blog
❤11
Есть ли для вас недопонимание в разнице между сделкой ас-салям и между продажей того, чем человек не владеет?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ℹ️Хукм дропшиппинга: Дропшиппинг- это торговая операция, которая в действительности преподносится как купля-продажа, и происходит между тремя лицами: владельцем торговой платформы, клиентом и продавцом (реальным владельцем товара). У этой сделки может быть несколько вариантов, поэтому хукм исходя из этого может меняться. Основные модели дропшиппинга: 1. Агентская модель (الوكالة) — дозволена Владелец товара уполно…
👍21❤3
❗️Современные финансовые вопросы можно разделить на 4 категории: 1. Финансовые вопросы, получившие распространение в наше время — то есть новые формы финансовых отношений и сделок, которые ранее не были известны или не существовали в подобном виде. 2. Финансовые вопросы, хукм которых изменился вследствие изменения обстоятельств — например, вопросы, связанные с принятием (кабд) товара в наше время, с учётом развития…
❤10👍2
📌Лучшие мазхабы в разделе финансовых взаимоотношений - это мазхаб маликитов и ханбалитов. ❗️Сказал шейх уль-ислям Ибн Теймия: «Основы Малика в торговле лучше чем основы остальных, ведь эти основы он принял от Саида Ибн Аль-Мусейиба, про которого говорили, что он является самым сведущим в вопросах торговли, подобно тому, как говорили что ‘Ата самый сведущий в вопросах Хаджа, Ибрагим Ан-Наха’и самый сведущий в вопрос…
❤26🤝5
📌Перепродажа карты услуг. ⁉️Вопрос: Есть карты, которые можно получить на некоторых заправках, их ты можешь использовать для того, чтобы заправиться на 600 риалов, эту карту я купил у ее владельца за 550 риалов, каков хукм этого? ❗️Ответ: Этот вопрос похож на вопрос перепродажи саляма (когда деньги даются сразу, а описанный в договоре товар будет предоставлен через время) другому, прежде готовности товара. И это…
👍13❤8✍7
Актуальны ли для вас вопросы наследства?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Также, следует отметить, что существует разница, между наследством и между завещанием. Наследство- это то, что разделил Аллах, и никто не может это изменить, каждый наследник получит свою доли исходя из закона Аллаха, не в зависимости от его отношений с умершим. То есть два сына, один из которых обеспечивал и ухаживал за своим отцом, а второй на протяжении долгого времени даже не узнал как здоровье у его отца, получ…
❤16👍7
📌Составление завещания ⁉️Вопрос: Вы упомянули важность составления завещания для мусульманина, но как писать это завещание? Есть ли определенные нормы? ❗️Ответ: Во первых: Пророк, да благословит его Аллах и приветствует, побуждал к составлению завещания, в «Сахихе Аль-Бухари» приводится что он сказал: "Какое же право имеет мусульманин ночевать две ночи подряд, кроме как при наличии при нем его завещания?". Сказал…
👍18❤5
Уважаемые подписчики, после определенной паузы, с началом учебного года, мы, с дозволения Аллаха, возвращаемся к ведению канала. Будем продолжать выкладывать пользы, фетвы и слова ученых связанные с исламскими финансами. С дозволения Аллаха продолжим уроки, которые были приостановлены. Также есть и другие приятные нововведения на канале, которые вы со временем ин шаа Аллах увидите. Просим у Аллаха содействия.
👍35❤16🔥5
Posted without readable text
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @atTamuil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Есть ли для вас недопонимание в разнице между сделкой ас-салям и между продажей того, чем человек не владеет?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Актуальны ли для вас вопросы наследства?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2025 to 16 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 961,884 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОСНОВЫ ИСЛАМСКИХ ФИНАНСОВ” (@atTamuil), 3,400 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/atTamuil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.