Channel
@asymmetric_thinker
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
2,366subscribers
-30 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003022246801 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @asymmetric_thinker |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 10 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/asymmetric_thinker |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 2,366 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 2,369 | -9 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 20:44 | 2,378 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 2,382 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 2,386 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 2,388 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:25 | 2,390 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 2,393 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:32 | 2,396 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:19 | 2,396 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 10 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
395 reactions across 19 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 185 | 46.8% | |
| 👍 | 49 | 12.4% | |
| 🔥 | 49 | 12.4% | |
| 🙏 | 19 | 4.81% | |
| 🥰 | 19 | 4.81% | |
| ☃ | 17 | 4.30% | |
| 💯 | 16 | 4.05% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 2.78% | |
| 🫡 | 7 | 1.77% | |
| 🏆 | 5 | 1.27% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 1.27% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 1.01% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.759% | |
| 🆒 | 2 | 0.506% | |
| ✍ | 1 | 0.253% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.253% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.253% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.253% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 395 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 6 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Gm, 10x so far (upd. 20x) I've made a lot of mistakes over the years ignoring new shiny buttons because I was too overwhelmed with day-to-day drama. I'll keep watching out for more of those. Have a great week ahead!
❤33🔥10🥰5
It feels refreshing clicking new buttons As I was trying to escape infinite noise of monitoring Iran situation, STRC situation, trenches situation and all other drama - I came across this cool little thing: https://x.com/fraudsworth Easy TLDR: https://x.com/CryoPalmar/status/2039037184125096109 Dev: https://x.com/MetalLegBob Stats: https://www.fraudsworth.fyi/ (community made by nftimm) I always treat weird new t…
❤20
Sticker, posted without a caption
🙏19🤣6😁3
P.S. The crowded PUMP trade last summer is a great example of how this approach could have saved a lot of nerves and energy. After launch, people started trying to catch the bottom from the very first red candle. What followed was 1.5 ish months of bleeding and chop below 0.004, filled with recurring FUD, endless debates on X, long threads, and constant complaining. Meanwhile, those who simply bid PUMP on the brea…
❤29👍10
Also, Happy New Year, everyone! I have bunch of ideas to share and I will be more active again once back from vacation later. Peace ✌🏻
☃17❤8🏆5
Lighter 🕯️ I think majority of traders should prioritise timing entry for breakout rather than buying simply because something is cheap to its value or trying to catch the bottom. ——— Being a long-term believer and accumulating lows can definitely lead to better average entry prices, but it comes with far more uncertainty that’s outside a trader’s control. These are what I call “conviction tests” — you might need t…
🥰14❤12🤣5
I understand it now
🔥15🤡4🕊1😭1
✍️ Side notes: - Download Fomo. Even if you don’t want to use it for trading purposes (I do), a lot of bright minds trade there and discovering them is already worth it and quite easy. - I still think Hakimi is the better coin than 4 in that range. Strong charts over strong ideas. - Chinese quotes are also back on the menu. If Binance lists something, it will be in Chinese imo. - Last thing I had fun researching …
❤16
December plan ("Can we win?") 🗣 Majors: Cautiously bullish It feels like all ingredients for Santa rally mode are present but cautious because we’re still on path to print major lower high until further notice. Cautious = more TPs. Focus onchain tbh. 🗣 Onchain: Correct thesis at the wrong timing is a wrong thesis Despite some strong runners, overall liquidity is thin. I think main difference now is that traders h…
❤10👍1🤡1
GM, survivors Time-based capitulation at its best. I don’t read TL but I suppose it’s quite dark out there. As I see it: Still at range. Nothing here. Anxiety holding under 107. Considering a j*b holding under 100. Relief above 116. Euphoria above 120. Nothing in between. Just a range. No bullposting. No bearposting. I’ll reserve this one for CT demons. I will keep adding codec and brew if lower prices presented
👍23🤝4❤3
we like them slow mooners under radar
❤11
Robotics: First innings. Clankers among us As we discussed in post above we finally start seeing first signs of speculative interest towards Robotics in Q4. Based of valuations and fundings companies are getting I am confident to say that this is the only meta on horizon that may be comparable to notorious AI season. What is notable is that crypto will provide enough possibilities to freely speculate on Robotics g…
🔥9❤4
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @asymmetric_thinker. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Asymmetric Thinker” (@asymmetric_thinker), 2,366 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asymmetric_thinker.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.