Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Астролог Светлана Жукова отзывы

Channel

Астролог Светлана Жукова отзывы

@astrosvet_otzyvy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002255031091
TypeChannel
Username@astrosvet_otzyvy
Created9 January 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/astrosvet_otzyvy

Growth

28 August 2026 — 2 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2 subscribers8 August 202614 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1–3 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 05:192no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:452first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
18
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2025 to 14 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Nov 2025, 11:34 UTC9 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @astrosvet11Photo

Давненько не показывала вам отзывы. Вот. Смотрите 😊 #астросвет_отзывы

9 Jun 2025, 04:28 UTC23 views0 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @astrosvet11Photo

Уже целую неделю в своей суете обследований забываю вам показать еще один отзыв о моей работе 😊 В данном случае это отзыв на хорарный вопрос. Подробнее о хорарах писала тут #астросвет_отзывы

20 May 2025, 07:00 UTC22 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @astrosvet11Photo

Ещё один отзыв об анализе натальной карты. Личную часть конечно отрезала Иногда нам нужно только подтверждение, что мы на правильном пути. А иногда нужно этот путь подсветить. Хотите узнать свои сильные стороны и ловушки, в которые вы ловите сами себя? Пишите мне в ЛС (как это сделать есть в описании канала и закреплённым сообщении). #астросвет_отзывы

12 May 2025, 04:10 UTC20 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @astrosvet11Photo

Ещё один отзыв о моей работе ❤️ Я всегда делаю письменный разбор. Да, у меня это занимает больше времени, но у вас есть возможность вернуться и перечитать в любой момент. Часто осознание приходит не сразу и это нормально - любая ситуация требует осмысления #астросвет_отзывы

30 Apr 2025, 06:35 UTC17 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @astrosvet11Photo

Девушка заказала анализ натальной карты для сына. После моего разбора, захотела анализ натальной карты и для себя. Хотя для себя уже ранее заказывала у другого астролога. Приятно ❤️ #астросвет_отзывы

16 Apr 2025, 04:36 UTC17 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @astrosvet11Photo

Еще один отзыв про анализ натальной карты, который я делала ❤️ Радуюсь, когда моя работа помогает людям #астросвет_отзывы

1

24 Mar 2025, 07:36 UTC18 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @astrosvet11Photo

Получила вчера новый отзыв о своей работе. Приятно. Рада, что оказалась полезной 😊❤️ #астросвет_отзывы

20 Mar 2025, 11:10 UTC16 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @astrosvet11Photo

И сразу же сегодня получила вот такой отзыв ❤️ Девушка уже заказывала у меня анализ натальных карт своих детей и прогноз на год для себя. Стоимость разбора натальной карты, кстати, всего 2000 руб до 1 мая. Затем будет повышение цен. Успевайте. #отзывы

9 Jan 2025, 08:00 UTC20 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @astrosvet11Photo

Что-то давно я вам отзывы не показывала о своей работе. Как будто подпольная скромница какая-то 😁 а я - нет Вот отзыв о моих любимых хорарчиках #отзыв #хорар

1

9 Jan 2025, 07:54 UTC16 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @astrosvet11Photo

Вот такой отзыв на анализ совместимости пары получила на днях. Довольна и хвастаюсь) #отзывы #синастрия #совместимость

9 Jan 2025, 07:54 UTC16 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @astrosvet11Photo

#отзывы #хорар

9 Jan 2025, 07:53 UTC13 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @astrosvet11Photo

Это отзыв на анализ детских натальных карт. Если вы хотите так же познакомиться со своими детьми, посмотреть на них новым взглядом - до 5 ноября действует скидка. Подробности в этом посте https://t.me/astrosvet11/177 Если кто-то сомневается и ему нужен знак - это он 💫 #отзывы #детскаянатальнаякарта

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @astrosvet_otzyvy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Астролог Светлана Жукова отзывы” (@astrosvet_otzyvy), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astrosvet_otzyvy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.