Channel
@astronomic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,096subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001426227832 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @astronomic |
| Description | I like the kind of people who get excited over a sky full of stars at night🌌. 💲Ads: https://telega.io/c/Astronomy_knowledge |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/astronomic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 10,096 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 10,098 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:54 | 10,100 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:22 | 10,098 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 10,099 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:37 | 10,100 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:45 | 10,100 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
340 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 118 | 34.7% | |
| 🔥 | 110 | 32.4% | |
| ❤ | 68 | 20.0% | |
| 🤩 | 16 | 4.71% | |
| 🤯 | 13 | 3.82% | |
| 🏆 | 7 | 2.06% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 1.18% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 0.882% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.294% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 340reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 November 2025 to 13 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Did you know? There’s a planet made of diamond! 💎✨ Scientists discovered a planet called 55 Cancri e, about 40 light-years away, that is mostly made of carbon. Because of the extreme pressure and heat, most of that carbon is thought to be in the form of diamond!
👍13❤9🔥3
25 brightest stars in the night sky. 🌃
❤18👍7
A visual representation of Size of Jupiter compared to Earth.
🔥17👍8❤3
Can wormholes do the magic for humanity? What do you think?👇
🔥12❤8👍3🤯1
If the sun stopped shining suddenly, it would take eight minutes for people on earth to see it, because of the time it takes light to travel to earth.
🔥17👍6❤2
The Moon is Slowly Drifting Away: • Our Moon is moving about 3.8 centimeters (1.5 inches) away from Earth each year. • This process has been happening for billions of years and is why the Earth's rotation is slowing down, making our days longer.
🔥17👍6❤3
The Universe Has a "Cosmic Microwave Background" (CMB): • This is the oldest light in the universe, a faint glow of radiation left over from the Bi Bang. • It's like an echo of the universe's infancy, providing crucial evidence for the Big Bang theory and helping us understand the early universe.
🔥8❤1👍1🤯1
• 🕰️ A day on Venus is longer than its year
❤14👍6
Two diamond shaped, rubble-pile asteroids have been observed near Earth, and were photographed by unmanned spacecrafts in 2018 and 2019. Scientists at OIST and Rutgers University have used a simple model normally reserved for the flow of grains to explain their unusual shape. In this image, a photograph of one of the asteroids, Bennu, is shown on the left. On the right, a simulation using the model is shown. As can b…
👍4🔥4❤3
There are "Rogue Planets": Some planets don’t orbit any star at all. They wander through the cold darkness of interstellar space alone, having been kicked out of their original solar systems.
🔥8😢4
Today we are going to have discussions Topic Do you believe in the existence of extraterrestrial life? Share why you don't believe or believe any thing rather than politics and bad words is allowed Comment 👇
🔥13👍3❤1
Did you know? There’s a planet made of diamond! 💎✨ Scientists discovered a planet called 55 Cancri e, about 40 light-years away, that is mostly made of carbon. Because of the extreme pressure and heat, most of that carbon is thought to be in the form of diamond!
👍13❤1👌1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @astronomic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 184,931 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Astronomy Knowledge” (@astronomic), 10,096 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astronomic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.