Channel
@astromolly
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,587subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001551074836 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @astromolly |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/astromolly |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Sept 2026, 17:01 | 1,587 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:08 | 1,589 | +17 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 1,572 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 1,575 | +11 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:06 | 1,564 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:22 | 1,561 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:54 | 1,563 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 1,565 | -10 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:13 | 1,575 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:37 | 1,577 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 1,575 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 1,575 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
292 reactions across 15 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 165 | 56.5% | |
| 🔥 | 53 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5294180438003180787 | 18 | 6.16% | |
| 😍 | 18 | 6.16% | |
| 🙏 | 17 | 5.82% | |
| custom 5208789285498548487 | 5 | 1.71% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 1.71% | |
| 💋 | 4 | 1.37% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.37% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.03% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 292 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вчера я обещала показать, как Коридоры Затмений проигрываются у меня самой 🌑 Я сама проживаю каждый Коридор Затмений по своему прогнозу🙏🏼 Поэтому это не что-то теоретическое Я вижу и знаю на практике, как работают прогнозы Коридоров Затмений)) Расскажу про один из таких прогнозов, который проигрался для меня настооолько в плюс И так сильно мне помог Я благодарна ему и по сей день)) Это был Коридор Затмений в фев…
❤7🔥2😍1
Почему я никогда не пугаю прогнозами? Или моя философия)) Есть кое-что, с чем я вот вообще не согласна в астрологии🫠 Очень часто прогнозы звучат примерно, как «у вас будет развод!😱», «вы потеряете работу!😨», «вас ждёт тяжёлый период!😕» И вот что дальше человеку с этим делать? Естественно, человек пугается таких прогнозов Только что ему делать то с этой информацией? 👀 Я никогда не воспринимала прогноз как пригово…
🔥11🥰4👏3❤2
Что вообще такое этот ваш Коридор Затмений? 🌑 Наверняка многие задаются вопросом - почему про Коридор Затмений так много разговоров? Что вообще ТАКОГО происходит? По сути, с точки зрения астрономии - обычное явление Но нееет)) Конкретно в астрологии Коридор Затмений - это про периоды больших жизненных развилок 🛣 Именно поэтому в это время люди чаще принимают решения, которые потом меняют их жизнь на месяцы и даж…
❤13🔥5😍1
Совсем скоро у нас наступит период Коридора Затмений 🌪 И я хочу подробнее раскрыть важность этого периода Астролог всегда исследователь)) Поэтому последние несколько лет я изучаю взаимосвязь Затмений и важных событий в жизни человека ✔️ Что могу сказать ⬇️ На моей практике - самые большие события в жизни людей очень часто начинают происходить именно в периоды Коридоров Затмений Причём, это не мелочи, а конкретные…
❤20👍5🔥3
Всё очень сильно откликается, благодарю ❤️
❤4
Яночка, благодарю 🙏 Мне все очень откликается
❤5
Яночка, я в шоке, но сошлось как будто бы все😳💕
❤4😍1
ПОТОК 3
custom 529418043800318078710❤5
ПОТОК 2
❤10custom 52087892854985484875💋4🙏1
ПОТОК 1
❤14🙏4🔥2
ПОТОКИ НА АВГУСТ 🤩 Что такое потоки? Потоки - это информация из Хроник Акаши на месяц Условно, как прогноз на месяц)) Потока будет 3 Вам нужно будет выбрать СВОЙ 🫂 Как выбрать поток? ⚪️Сердцем ⚪️Почувствовать, к какому голосовому вас больше тянет ⚪️Может, в голове появится конкретная цифра - 1, 2 или 3 ⚪️А может подскажет интуиция - какой поток именно ВАШ Какие вопросы разбираю в потоках? ⚪️Общий фон месяца для…
❤15custom 52941804380031807878🔥7😍1
Сегодня весь день прописываю структуру моего нового практикума по Коридору Затмений 😍 Я обожаю этот подготовительный этап Утвердила окончательную программу - там мёёёд! 🤌 Огромнейшая ценнейшая выжимка собранных мною знаний в одном большом практикуме)) И в этот раз будет 3 тарифа Третий тариф - нововведение для меня, но я хочу попробовать Не зря же мне в голову пришла эта идея 😄 Буквально через несколько дней начн…
🔥11❤6😍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @astromolly. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🌙ЯНА МОЛИНА | АСТРОЛОГ | ЭЗОТЕРИК” (@astromolly), 1,587 subscribers as measured 8 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astromolly.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.