Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
12 measurements spanning 43 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,057–4,103 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 09:16
4,062
-6
11 Sept 2026, 08:58
4,068
-14
6 Sept 2026, 14:36
4,082
-5
1 Sept 2026, 20:04
4,087
-1
29 Aug 2026, 19:14
4,088
+2
23 Aug 2026, 16:27
4,086
-7
20 Aug 2026, 06:04
4,093
-2
17 Aug 2026, 11:18
4,095
-3
14 Aug 2026, 05:58
4,098
+3
10 Aug 2026, 23:21
4,095
-1
8 Aug 2026, 06:45
4,096
-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:17
4,098
first reading
Engagement
11 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
19s
Average length
19s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,986 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,026
51.7%
🔥
836
42.1%
custom 5458707294944500893
100
5.04%
🤯
24
1.21%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,986 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 11 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @astrolog_razzzgulyaeva. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 July 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ПРОГНОЗ 3 — 9 АВГУСТА
🔶3 августа, понедельник
Очень огненный понедельник. Старт недели лучше провести бодро, но без перегрузок.
Намерение на день: «Могу и буду».
Оттенки в одежде: оранжевый, желтый.
🔶4 августа, вторник
С самого раннего утра лучше начать прививать привычку, что никак не получалось освоить. Метеозависимым дурно.
Намерение на день: «Всё по заслугам и совести».
Оттенки в одежде: темные без контраст…
У меня сегодня день рождения. Вспоминая прошедший соляр (местами опасный, местами прекрасный), хочу пожелать себе и вам одного — сохранить включенность в жизнь во что бы то ни стало.
Как говорят «по роду службы» мне легко дается считывать настроения людей. И выводы за год неутешительные, честно признаться.
На обязательной основе выделяйте время на себя, на здоровье, на отдых вопреки якобы срочным делам. Кто опустил…
🌿5 способов «проработки» Юпитера в своем гороскопе 29 июля (можно еще завтра):
1. Роль.
Сыграйте интересующуюся вас роль. Роль того человека, каким хочется стать (ключевое — уверенность, статус, уважение, признание). Важно всё: стиль одежды, осанка, речь, лексика, поведение и выбор рутины.
2. Инструментальный способ.
Соберите талисман из подходящих минералов: сапфир, лазурит, мрамор. Либо украшение из олово.
3. Пл…
🔶КАЗИМИ ЮПИТЕРА
Вам вряд ли об этом кто-то расскажет.)) Большинство не придаст этому значения, а те, кто в теме будут молчать (эзотеризм - это про внутреннее). Но я популяризирую осознанное самосовершенствование и интегральное видение возможностей развития. Поэтому пишу с самого утра.
Сегодня, 29 июля, Юпитер встает в точное соединение с Солнце в знаке Льва (сердце Солнца, «казими»). Светило и планета благочестия в…
ЗАЖИГАЙ В ЭТОМ АВГУСТЕ
🔶ОБЩЕЕ МИРОВОЕ
В этом месяце у нас затмения 12.08 солнечное и 28.08 лунное. Нам важно лунное 28 августа, о нем я писала еще в годовом прогнозе.
Какие мунданные гороскопы попадают под это событие: Украина, Лукашенко, ядерные испытания, Трамп, Зеленский, Путин. Например, у Трампа затмения по оси 1/7, что может говорить о довольно скорых переменах в теме здоровья и/или партнерства (с Меланией)…
🔸 Атака бпла на крупнейшие склады WB
Техногенная катастрофа с еще одной попыткой логистической блокады. Теперь прогноз отошел полностью. 💯 Я с нетерпением жду, когда я начну прогнозировать что-то доброе/вечное и это начнет также оперативно сбываться.
Погибшие люди - это трагедия. Весь малый бизнес в стране хочется обнять.
Напишите, пожалуйста, как вы используете мои прогнозы кроме, как прочитать? Может кто-то корр…
🔶 Кому не лень, можете поискать прогнозы. Примерно с 2021 года говорила, что именно с 26-го машины резко начнут дорожать. Владение несколькими машинами станет или нецелесообразным или роскошью. Связано это в первую очередь с транзитом Урана по Близнецам.
В июле прогнозировала попытки «логистической блокады». Вроде отошло.
Но текущий топливный беспредел это больше про Юпитер 180 Плутон. А именно некое противостояние…
Сижу и думаю, а прогноз по «логистической блокаде» в июле уже можно ставить мне в зачет или еще подождем? 🥸
#бензин
🔥136custom 545870729494450089318❤12
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @astrolog_razzzgulyaeva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Lucky Club: Авто @lucky_club_ru · 119,348 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Астролог Разгуляева” (@astrolog_razzzgulyaeva), 4,062 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astrolog_razzzgulyaeva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.