Channel
@astroglamp
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
9,844subscribers
+148 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001585615717 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @astroglamp |
| Created | 21 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/astroglamp |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 9,844 | +71 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 9,773 | +60 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:03 | 9,713 | +17 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 9,696 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:55 | 9,696 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (23 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 21,670 |
| Reactions total | 384 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 14:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
384 reactions across 11 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 176 | 45.8% | |
| ❤ | 112 | 29.2% | |
| custom 5372846474881146350 | 62 | 16.1% | |
| 👍 | 17 | 4.43% | |
| 👏 | 10 | 2.60% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 1.82% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 384reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Как настрой?
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
custom 537284647488114635014🔥5🥰1
Друзья, на связи Антон - основатель и руководитель Astroglamp. И мы с командой задумываемся над новым краудфандингом. Цель - самый большой визуальный телескоп в России. Среди публичных обсерваторий. Диаметром зеркала 813 мм и длиной почти три метра! Цена махины около 3 млн рублей, зависит от курса и логистики. Такие вещи делаются на производстве под заказ. Прицениваемся, общаемся с заводом и думаем осилим ли.. В про…
custom 537284647488114635018❤11🔥11
«Повернуты на астрономии» - часто слышу такую характеристику про наших сотрудников и, конечно, про ребят астрономов. На днях таксист привез новых гостей, удивлялся нашему месту и спросил у других гостей, которые сидели в тот момент на ресепшн и уже отнаблюдали ночь «А здесь действительно все повернуты на астрономии?». Гости ответили «Конечно! Это видно!». Если честно, это высшая похвала. Приезжайте и убедитесь!😀Бро…
🔥23❤11🥰6👍4
Друзья, сегодня была одна из лучших наблюдательных ночей сезона. Несмотря на яркую Луну (по которой мы от души «погуляли» с помощью телескопов), посмотрели глубокий Космос - галактики, двойные звезды, скопления звезд и, конечно, красавец Сатурн на большом увеличении. До мурашек! Сделал фото на обычный смартфон. Все чаще видим «падающие звезды». Самый зрелищный метеорный поток сезона Персеиды набирает активность. В п…
🔥29❤13custom 53728464748811463505
Друзья, у нас супер новость! Специально для Interstellar Fest 2026 мы организовали съемки лекции Мартина Риса в Кембридже! На фестивале его выступление вживую будет переводить Ринат Кагиров - астрофизик из МГУ и Оксфорда. Спасибо Ринату, очень удачно, что смогли записать это интервью и все так совпало (отметьте в программе лекцию самого Рината - обязательна к посещению!😊) И спасибо Мартину за гостеприимство, это было…
🔥28❤12custom 53728464748811463506
Как Вам новый дом с куполом?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔥7❤5custom 53728464748811463505👍2
Друзья, как вам новый дом с куполом? Пишите комменты! Выложим в продажу в модуль бронирования на следующей неделе! ‼️ Ищем видеографа на съемку лекций 11-12 августа. В эти даты у нас пройдет Interstellar Fest - главное астрономическое событие лета и звездопад Персеид! Ищем профи со своим оборудованием для записи видео и аудио. Если есть знакомые - предложите. От нас бартер на заезд в домики и билеты на фест. Рассмот…
🔥16custom 53728464748811463507❤5
Друзья, отличный, насыщенный инженерно-космический кэмп, спасибо гостям! Запускали ракеты, собирали луноходы и посадочные модули, смастерили собственные телескопы, провели физические опыты, изучили выставку астрономических приборов, послушали семь лекций и музыкальное выступление «Гершель-шоу». На последнем зрители выкрикивали «Это было незабываемо!», «Прекрасно!» - и много чего еще. Спасибо еще раз, это очень заряжа…
❤7custom 53728464748811463505🔥4
Хочу еще раз проговорить мысль, которую пытался донести в интервью Сберу. У человека в 15, 30, 45 и 60 лет разные ощущения от жизни, взгляд на то, как должно быть устроено общество, отношение к технологиям и т.п. И разная идеальная картина будущего. Но мы убеждены, что у каждого в глубине души есть природный интерес к загадкам окружающего мира. И, как следствие, к астрономии - науке о главной загадке - Космосе, в ко…
❤29👍11🔥8custom 53728464748811463502
Друзья, мы попали в публикацию от Сбера. Вообще, год удачный на СМИ. Каждый сезон в нашем маркетинговом плане стоят несколько публикаций и обычно мы ищем куда выслать пресс-релизы, но в этом году нас все сами нашли - Сбер, Тиньков, S7. Еще был радиоэфир, несколько публикаций в профильных СМИ, репортаж по России 1. Мы попали на страницы легендарной печатной газеты Комсомольская правда. И, что совсем невероятно - рекла…
🔥39❤10👏7
Друзья, главное астрономическое событие лета уже через три недели. В пик звездопада Персеид 8-13 августа у нас пройдет Interstellar Fest. Места с палатками и автодомами закончились. Появляются на сайте, когда кто-то из гостей сдает билеты, в среднем раз в день. Но! На некоторые даты есть шатры и домики в глэмпинге на территории феста. Для удобства публикуем оставшиеся слоты. Билеты на фест уже включены в стоимость п…
❤9🔥6👏3
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @astroglamp. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Как настрой?
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Как Вам новый дом с куполом?
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 33,085 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ASTROGLAMP. Человек рожден удивляться.” (@astroglamp), 9,844 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astroglamp.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.