Channel
@astratic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
60subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 3 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004328840626 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @astratic |
| Created | 26 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 3 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/astratic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 05:01 | 60 | +7 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:22 | 53 | no change |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:49 | 53 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 26 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @astratic. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 5 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 August 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
seraph ﹐🪽 @words advice n funfacts for zodiac signs seraph ﹐🪽 @visual astrological games n challenges seraph ﹐🪽 @melody music based on your zodiac sign seraph ﹐🪽 @show movie n series under astrology effect
main road // this is my wonderland you don't have to fend, you can leave at any point that you wish to return, don't try to comprehend what's inside my head 🧸.
▫️🪽
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel created
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @astratic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ : saint portrait” (@astratic), 60 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astratic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.