Channel
@astratanya_lib
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
214subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002324153911 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @astratanya_lib |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/astratanya_lib |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 214 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 219 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:17 | 220 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:00 | 220 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 18 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (18 April 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 47 |
| Reactions total | 26 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 03:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
221 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5357579953497983889 | 114 | 51.6% | |
| custom 5434125552137032311 | 51 | 23.1% | |
| custom 5357428667569948200 | 49 | 22.2% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 3.17% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 18 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Может быть я немного мазохист. А может наоборот, читая такую литературу, понимаешь, что все у меня в принципе хорошо) А что читаете вы, делитесь)
custom 535757995349798388912custom 54341255521370323118custom 53574286675699482006
Сегодня у меня спросили, как мой блог и где контент) Пока, к сожалению, очень тяжело совмещать все жизненные заботы с ведением блога. Но я все еще продолжаю читать 😁 и очень надеюсь, что скоро найду время снова делиться впечатлениями о книгах 💔 А пока вот вам фото с сегодняшней встречи книжного клуба) Кто здесь еще остался, маякните в комментариях 🙂
custom 535757995349798388920custom 53574286675699482006custom 54341255521370323116
Вот такой продуктивный май 🙂 Антикварная лавка утерянных судеб 7/10 Пункт обмена печали на надежду 8/10 Дети в гараже моего папы 7/10 Балерина из Аушвица 7/10 Хранитель памяти 5/10 Салихат 5/10 Девять лжецов 6/10 Похищение 6/10 Вьюрки 6/10 Делитесь вашими итогами в комментариях)
custom 535757995349798388916custom 543412555213703231110custom 53574286675699482006
Привет-привет! Делитесь, что читаете сейчас? Я продолжаю делать вид, что не задолжала отзывов на 7 книг 😁
custom 535742866756994820010custom 53575799534979838897custom 54341255521370323116
Книжные итоги апреля ☀️ Мой нечитун пока меня не покидает. Очень много, которых «понадкусывала», но они не пошли :( О Таёжном еще будет отзыв, а о книге Романа скажу пару слов. Мне нравится Роман, как комик и блоггер, но к сожалению книга вышла провальной. Сама идея неплохая, но, к сожалению, подвела реализация. Очень много героев, и порой непонятно откуда они вообще все взялись. Текст показался каким-то разорванн…
custom 535757995349798388914custom 535742866756994820010custom 54341255521370323117
Сегодня состоялась очередная встреча с этими волшебными девушками ♥️ И снова хочу сказать о том, что это уже намного больше чем просто книжный клуб) Так душевно, весело, легко и непринуждённо можно обсуждать вообще все на свете) Получила подарочки к восьмому марта, и ко дню рождения, который был аж в январе😁. Из них семь книг, и две бомбические кружки 😌 Обсудили книгу месяца, в этот раз это была Наталья Елецкая «…
custom 535757995349798388920🔥7custom 53574286675699482004custom 54341255521370323114
Моя маленькая принцесса, Будь счастлива! Мы тебя очень любим! ♥️
custom 535757995349798388925custom 543412555213703231110custom 53574286675699482007
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @astratanya_lib. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 572,745 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“astratanya | books | psy” (@astratanya_lib), 214 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/astratanya_lib.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.