Channel
@asthetic
On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry
394subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001921187904 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @asthetic |
| Created | 27 May 2023 โ measured โ dated from the channelโs first post |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/asthetic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:07 | 394 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 393 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:16 | 393 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 27 May 2023 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
77 reactions across 3 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| โค | 37 | 48.1% | |
| ๐ | 35 | 45.5% | |
| ๐ | 2 | 2.60% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.30% | |
| ๐ | 1 | 1.30% | |
| ๐คฃ | 1 | 1.30% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2023 to 27 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐๐๐๐ฌ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ง ๐๐ ๐จ๐ญ๐จ๐งฬ๐จ ๐ฃ๐ข๐ฃ๐ข๐ฃ๐ข ๐ช๐ฎ๐ ๐ก๐๐ซ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ซ๐๐ฌ ๐๐ง ๐จ๐ญ๐จ๐งฬ๐จโ
โค19๐13๐1
๐ด๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐ข ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐โ
โค13๐4๐คฃ1๐1
Hแดสแด ! BIENBENIDO ! ๐ถ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐๐ฃ๐จ๐ฌ: โป๏ธ๐ค๐ ๐๐๐ค๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ก๐ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐๐ฃ ๐ฆ๐ ๐๐๐ฬ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ฃ๐ฆ๐ก๐ ๐๐ค๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ญ 1. โป๏ธ๐ค๐ ๐๐๐ค๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ก๐ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ ๐ฆ๐ ๐๐๐ค๐ฆ๐๐ฅ* ๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ฅ ๐๐ค๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐๐จ๐ญ 2. โป๏ธ๐ค๐ ๐๐๐ค๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐ง๐๐ฃ๐ค๐๐ฃ ๐๐ ๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ค๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ข 1. ๐๐ถ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฎ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฎ ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ฟ๐ฎ ๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐ป๐น๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐: t.me/modaaqui ๐ ๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ฐ๐ : sฬธiฬธ uฬธsฬธtฬธeฬธdฬธ tฬธrฬธaฬธtฬธaฬธ mฬธaฬธlฬธ aฬธ uฬธnฬธaฬธ pฬธeฬธrฬธsฬธoฬธnฬธaฬธ mฬธaฬธlฬธ eฬธ
๐18โค5๐2
Channel created
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @asthetic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank โ 1,520,395 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel โ every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโs namer to yesterdayโs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ the โNamed by N registered channelsโ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@asthetic named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleโs history โ see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today โ not that anything โdiedโ. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel โ we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 โ this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ๐ข๐โ (@asthetic), 394 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asthetic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.