Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝔄𝔰𝔱𝔢𝔯愛𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚔ツ𝘿𝙠𝙢 ПЕРЕЕЗД

Channel

𝔄𝔰𝔱𝔢𝔯愛𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚔ツ𝘿𝙠𝙢 ПЕРЕЕЗД

@asterworkdkm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

10subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003790630304
TypeChannel
Username@asterworkdkm
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 24 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/asterworkdkm

Growth

1012 Aug 2026, 20:48 — 10 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 22:26 — 10 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 20:4812 Aug 2026, 22:26
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–11 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:2610no change
12 Aug 2026, 20:4810first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 24 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 6 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5208783972624009845825.0%
custom 5298613643116555953618.8%
custom 5298750085637616877515.6%
custom 5310033170882650644412.5%
custom 530129891250460242839.38%
custom 532124363252566500339.38%
custom 529868895107312514313.13%
custom 532115233870082164613.13%
custom 532148313278699444213.13%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 7 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Mar 2026, 12:20 UTC41 viewsread 12 August 2026

https://t.me/SILEXWORKDKM Новый порт, союзы — разрыв, можете написать по поводу союза, если, хотите конечно..извините. 🤩

7 Mar 2026, 12:20 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «𝔄𝔰𝔱𝔢𝔯愛𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚔ツ𝘿𝙠𝙢 ПЕРЕЕЗД»

7 Mar 2026, 05:00 UTC45 viewsread 12 August 2026

Может канал купить..типо, ну, если есть возможность, то почему нет? 🌟 Но с другой стороны это нечестно, эти люди меня знать не будут и аудитория во все не моя. Что думаете? Кстати, по поводу баннеров, я все переделываю, мне ничего уже не нравится. 😺

4 Mar 2026, 06:18 UTC54 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Что лучше..первый вариант или второй?

3 Mar 2026, 13:57 UTC55 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Здесь спойлер к новой эре. Мне не совсем нравится, что вышло, но ладно. 🥺 Постараюсь доделать завтра или сегодня, если смогу, конечно же.

custom 52087839726240098451custom 53100331708826506441

3 Mar 2026, 02:09 UTC50 viewsread 12 August 2026

Через три часа закрою опросики🌟

2 Mar 2026, 20:01 UTC55 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Новый маскот?🤗

  1. Оставляем Цзяоцю.😊0%
  2. Флинс🤔45%
  3. Воскресенье😩45%
  4. Моя кнопка.9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Mar 2026, 19:52 UTC45 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Возвращаем ник SILEX?( САЙЛЕКС, КАПЛИ ДЛЯ НОСА, ЧТО УГОДНО, НО НЕ СИЛЕКС, МОЛЮ.)

  1. Да, мы хотим.🌟92%
  2. Нет, нам и так нравится. 🌟0%
  3. Кнопочка для владельца.8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Mar 2026, 19:50 UTC39 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

И так ребята, я искренне благодарю за 20 подписчиков с учетом того, что я ничего практически не делаю. Я уверен, что могу на большее, только нужно работать, очень много работать. Кстати говоря, буду делать переоформление, так как мне не особо нравится все, что вышло, вообщем надоело. Также думаю взять старый ник Silex, кто помнит, тот помнит и возможно, будет даже рад. Сейчас запущу два опроса, потыкаете и выберете,

custom 52087839726240098451custom 52986136431165559531custom 53212436325256650031

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @asterworkdkm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Mar 2026, 20:01 UTCFinal Results11 voters

Новый маскот?🤗

  1. Оставляем Цзяоцю.😊0%
  2. Флинс🤔45%
  3. Воскресенье😩45%
  4. Моя кнопка.9%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Mar 2026, 19:52 UTCFinal Results12 voters

Возвращаем ник SILEX?( САЙЛЕКС, КАПЛИ ДЛЯ НОСА, ЧТО УГОДНО, НО НЕ СИЛЕКС, МОЛЮ.)

  1. Да, мы хотим.🌟92%
  2. Нет, нам и так нравится. 🌟0%
  3. Кнопочка для владельца.8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 7 March 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 712,964 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝔄𝔰𝔱𝔢𝔯愛𝚆𝚘𝚛𝚔ツ𝘿𝙠𝙢 ПЕРЕЕЗД” (@asterworkdkm), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asterworkdkm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.