Channel
@assoSLA
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,096subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001679054604 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @assoSLA |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/assoSLA |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 1,096 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 1,098 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 1,102 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:10 | 1,102 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 1,101 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (16 July 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 5,872 |
| Reactions total | 393 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
393 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 157 | 39.9% | |
| 👍 | 110 | 28.0% | |
| ❤ | 77 | 19.6% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 6.36% | |
| 🙏 | 23 | 5.85% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.254% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 393reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
⚖️ De nombreux élus, politiques et juristes se mobilisent à nos côtés pour réformer le principe d’excuse de minorité et mettre fin au scandale de la justice des mineurs. Parmi eux, l’avocat Gilles-William Goldnadel, l’ex ministre et ancienne membre du Conseil Constitutionnel Noëlle Lenoir, le sénateur Stéphane Ravier ou encore l’ancien ministre Charles Millon ont répondu à notre appel. ✍️ Signez ici vous aussi notr…
👍25❤10🔥1
Merci aux parlementaires Hervé de Lépinau (Député-maire de Carpentras Rassemblement National), Anne Sicard (Députée Identité-Libertés), Sarah Knafo (Députée européenne Reconquête!) et Thibaut Monnier (Député Identité-Libertés) qui ont signé notre tribune pour réformer l’excuse de minorité 🤝 Nos élus se mobilisent pour changer la justice des mineurs, nous continuons l’action ! 🔥 👉 Participez au mouvement en signant …
❤12🙏12👍10👏4🔥3
✍️ Julien Leonardelli (Député européen Rassemblement National), Marion Maréchal (Députée européenne Identité-Libertés), Alexandre Allegret-Pilot (Député UDR) et Laurence Trochu (Députée européenne Identité-Libertés) font partie des signataires de notre tribune pour réformer l’excuse de minorité. Il faut que la loi change, passons à l’action ! 🔥 ➡️ Vous pouvez aussi agir en signant ici notre pétition.
👍30🔥7👏5❤2🥰1
🔴 Nous poursuivons notre mobilisation pour mettre fin à l’excuse de minorité et à l’impunité des racailles. 👉 Nouvelle étape, nous mobilisons avec l’Observatoire des décisions de Justice et le Collectif Justice pour Louis, plusieurs dizaines de parlementaires, élus et juristes dans une tribune pour la réforme de l’excuse de minorité. ✍️ Cette action est la suite logique de notre pétition qui a déjà rassemblé plus de…
👍26🔥3❤1
👉 La tribune pour la réforme de la justice des mineurs que nous portons avec l’Observatoire des décisions de justice et le Collectif Justice pour Louis dans le JDD ⤵️ https://www.lejdd.fr/Societe/crimes-graves-pourquoi-il-faut-mettre-fin-a-lexcuse-de-minorite-179829 Plusieurs dizaines de signataires comme les avocats Pierre Gentillet, Gilles-Wiliam Goldnadel ou Lara Fatimi, l’ancienne membre du Conseil Constitutionn…
👏23👍1
✍️ Voici la liste des signataires de notre tribune qui rassemble parlementaires, élus et juristes pour réformer l’excuse de minorité. ➡️ Nous continuons le mouvement après avoir réuni plus de 115 000 signataires dans une pétition. La loi doit changer !
❤18👍11🔥4
🚨📢 Aux côtés de parlementaires, nous appelons à réformer la loi sur l'excuse de minorité pour les crimes les plus graves. Après l'immense mobilisation citoyenne suite à l’assassinat de Louis, place désormais au débat politique ⤵️ Retrouvez aujourd'hui dans le JDD la tribune que nous avons co-rédigée avec le Collectif Justice pour Louis et l'Observatoire des décisions de justice. Elle est cosignée par des élus, jur…
👏22❤4👍1🙏1
🔴 La circonstance aggravante de racisme anti blanc vient d’être officiellement retenue par les juges dans l’assassinat de Thomas Perroto à Crépol. 3 ans que tout le monde le savait, que les enquêteurs l’avaient noté, que les témoins l’avaient expliqué, mais que la justice entravait la vérité. 👉 Nous sommes fiers de nous être battus pour obtenir cette reconnaissance dès juin 2024, d’abord en vain. Mais cette décisio…
👏40❤15🙏7👍1🔥1
✅ Nouvelle victoire contre l’islamisme avec Marion Maréchal et Pascal Lepetit contre l’école des Frères musulmans La cour d’appel de Lyon vient de prononcer la relaxe de Marion Maréchal et du lanceur d’alerte Pascal Lepetit dans le procès en diffamation qui les opposait à l’IESH, institut proche des Frères musulmans et dissous par l’État en 2025. C’est une victoire importante contre l’islamisme dans notre pays. 👉 …
👏30❤3👍3🙏3
🔴 Nous venons d’obtenir avec l’ASLA la relaxe de Marion Maréchal et Pascal Lepetit dans leur procès contre l’IESH, l’école de formation des Frères Musulmans. 👉 Oui, la lutte contre l’islamisme n’est pas vaine. Oui, il faut continuer à lancer l’alerte sur les islamistes et leurs réseaux. Non, le djihad judiciaire ne nous fera jamais taire. Faites un don ici pour soutenir notre action 🤝
👏33❤12🔥6👍2
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @assoSLA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 127,343 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ASLA” (@assoSLA), 1,096 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/assoSLA.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.