Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for شرح اشتیاق

Channel

شرح اشتیاق

@asresherotaraneh

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,342subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001009657519
TypeChannel
Username@asresherotaraneh
Created27 September 2015 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded5 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/asresherotaraneh

Topic

Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “عصر شعر و ترانه” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

6,3296,3846,356.55 August 2026 — 6,370 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,380 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,384 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,383 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,381 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,376 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,363 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,368 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,365 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,366 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,362 subscribers7 September 2026 — 6,363 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,354 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,335 subscribers30 September 2026 — 6,329 subscribers7 October 2026 — 6,343 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,351 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,346 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,342 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,346 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,343 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,338 subscribers4 November 2026 — 6,344 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,342 subscribers6,3425 August 20267 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 93 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,321–6,392 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 06:206,342-2
4 Nov 2026, 06:106,344+6
1 Nov 2026, 04:216,338-5
29 Oct 2026, 07:466,343-3
26 Oct 2026, 03:456,346+4
22 Oct 2026, 18:106,342-4
16 Oct 2026, 20:066,346-5
13 Oct 2026, 17:096,351+8
7 Oct 2026, 14:366,343+14
30 Sept 2026, 15:356,329-6
16 Sept 2026, 10:186,335-19
12 Sept 2026, 05:416,354-9
7 Sept 2026, 21:556,363+1
2 Sept 2026, 14:436,362-4
30 Aug 2026, 23:076,366+1
28 Aug 2026, 02:476,365-3
25 Aug 2026, 03:436,368+5
22 Aug 2026, 03:346,363-13
19 Aug 2026, 01:436,376-5
15 Aug 2026, 19:586,381first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.7%
avg views ÷ 6,342 subscribers
Avg views / post
933
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.923%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held45 (15 June 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total12,128
Reactions total112
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 13:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
34m 24s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

472 reactions across 43 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤44794.7%
👏91.91%
👍61.27%
🔥51.06%
😢40.847%
💯10.212%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 472 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (7.69%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 07:29 UTC420 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🌱 حکمت خلق جهان در نظر #مولانا 📻نسخه کامل این ویدئو را در کانال بشنوید برای عضویت در کانال پادکست‌های شرح اشتیاق، از طریق ربات چراغک اقدام فرمایید: @cheraghakbot ▫️@AsreSheroTaraneh

❤10

1 Nov 2026, 10:08 UTC698 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

همراهان گرامی برای ثبت‌نام در کارگاه‌های حضوری و آنلاین شرح و تفسیر مثنوی معنوی با حضور دکتر کاکایی به آیدی زیر پیام بدهید: @amirkakaei

❤4

1 Nov 2026, 07:49 UTC581 views8 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🌱 علم اسماء در نظر #مولانا 📻نسخه کامل این ویدئو را در کانال بشنوید برای عضویت در کانال پادکست‌های شرح اشتیاق، از طریق ربات چراغک اقدام فرمایید: @cheraghakbot ▫️@AsreSheroTaraneh

❤8

28 Oct 2026, 10:19 UTC923 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026

همراهان گرامی برای ثبت‌نام در کارگاه‌های حضوری و آنلاین شرح و تفسیر مثنوی معنوی با حضور دکتر کاکایی به آیدی زیر پیام بدهید: @qghazalejafari

❤1

27 Oct 2026, 07:31 UTC891 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🌱 استعصای ذات الهی در نظر #مولانا 📻نسخه کامل این ویدئو را در کانال بشنوید برای عضویت در کانال پادکست‌های شرح اشتیاق، از طریق ربات چراغک اقدام فرمایید: @cheraghakbot ▫️@AsreSheroTaraneh

❤6

26 Oct 2026, 07:47 UTC847 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🌱 معجزه پیامبران در نظر #مولانا 📻نسخه کامل این ویدئو را در کانال بشنوید برای عضویت در کانال پادکست‌های شرح اشتیاق، از طریق ربات چراغک اقدام فرمایید: @cheraghakbot ▫️@AsreSheroTaraneh

❤6

25 Oct 2026, 07:53 UTC878 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🌱 محجوب از صفات بودن در نظر #مولانا 📻نسخه کامل این ویدئو را در کانال بشنوید برای عضویت در کانال پادکست‌های شرح اشتیاق، از طریق ربات چراغک اقدام فرمایید: @cheraghakbot ▫️@AsreSheroTaraneh

❤10🔥1

19 Oct 2026, 07:28 UTC≈1,080 views9 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🌱 کشف گمشده‌ها در نظر #مولانا 📻نسخه کامل این ویدئو را در کانال بشنوید برای عضویت در کانال پادکست‌های شرح اشتیاق، از طریق ربات چراغک اقدام فرمایید: @cheraghakbot ▫️@AsreSheroTaraneh

❤9

17 Oct 2026, 07:30 UTC≈1,160 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🌱نقد و نکوهش در مقابل چاپلوسی از نظر #مولانا 📻نسخه کامل این ویدئو را در کانال بشنوید برای عضویت در کانال پادکست‌های شرح اشتیاق، از طریق ربات چراغک اقدام فرمایید: @cheraghakbot ▫️@AsreSheroTaraneh

❤12

14 Oct 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,250 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

غیرت معشوق در شعر فارسی بخشی از اپیزود: عشق گدا به دختر شهریار عشق در منطق الطیر عطار دیدن ویدئو در یوتیوب زیستن با ادبیات: https://youtu.be/zCp3oMt4xhg

❤11

14 Oct 2026, 07:27 UTC≈1,140 views10 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🌱حق، میان تشبیه و تنزیه در نظر #مولانا 📻نسخه کامل این ویدئو را در کانال بشنوید برای عضویت در کانال پادکست‌های شرح اشتیاق، از طریق ربات چراغک اقدام فرمایید: @cheraghakbot ▫️@AsreSheroTaraneh

❤10

13 Oct 2026, 07:34 UTC≈1,080 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

🌱تجلی پویای هستی در نظر #مولانا 📻نسخه کامل این ویدئو را در کانال بشنوید برای عضویت در کانال پادکست‌های شرح اشتیاق، از طریق ربات چراغک اقدام فرمایید: @cheraghakbot ▫️@AsreSheroTaraneh

❤12

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @asresherotaraneh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @asresherotaraneh as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
12 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
12 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Mojtaba Shakori مجتبی شکوری
@mojtabashakoori_fan · 22,294
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 September 2026
حضرت مولانا
@molana79 · 104,598
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 15 August 2026
فایل های صوتی مزدافَر مؤمنی
@Mazdafarmomeni_mp3 · 39,512
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شرح اشتیاق” (@asresherotaraneh), 6,342 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asresherotaraneh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.