Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
22 measurements spanning 90 days, net +259. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,612–9,098 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 22
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 22:58
8,990
-7
1 Nov 2026, 15:36
8,997
-9
29 Oct 2026, 12:28
9,006
-1
26 Oct 2026, 21:26
9,007
-1
23 Oct 2026, 13:38
9,008
-11
20 Oct 2026, 17:31
9,019
+1
18 Oct 2026, 03:49
9,018
+10
14 Oct 2026, 20:35
9,008
-13
11 Oct 2026, 20:38
9,021
-21
5 Oct 2026, 05:41
9,042
+56
26 Sept 2026, 10:22
8,986
+316
15 Sept 2026, 07:57
8,670
-6
11 Sept 2026, 21:02
8,676
+8
2 Sept 2026, 14:18
8,668
-17
30 Aug 2026, 20:46
8,685
-14
27 Aug 2026, 17:43
8,699
-16
24 Aug 2026, 23:32
8,715
-4
21 Aug 2026, 02:07
8,719
-2
18 Aug 2026, 02:11
8,721
-5
15 Aug 2026, 06:46
8,726
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.3%
avg views ÷ 8,990 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,730
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.04%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held
28 (30 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total
20,793
Reactions total
1,255
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
4 Nov 2026, 21:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13m 18s
Average length
3m 20s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,247 reactions across 28 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
932
28.7%
custom 5278589921467052195
503
15.5%
❤🔥
391
12.0%
custom 5395502491792063696
239
7.36%
🔥
235
7.24%
🤯
204
6.28%
🥰
195
6.01%
👨💻
80
2.46%
💅
70
2.16%
👀
68
2.09%
💋
48
1.48%
😍
48
1.48%
🗿
40
1.23%
🎉
39
1.20%
🍓
23
0.708%
🏆
20
0.616%
😱
17
0.524%
🤩
16
0.493%
⚡
15
0.462%
🍾
10
0.308%
12 further kinds
54
1.66%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,247 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 28 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aspirantes_21. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🍂Итоги конкурса 🍂
Guys, завтра я подведу итоги и выберу самого упорного человечка, который учился вместе со мной :з
🍂🍂Подарок: любая книга
🍂🍂на Английском на выбор!
Условия конкурса: в посте тут
🍂 Последнее задание: написать под этим постом какие изменения и улучшения вы увидели у себя за время челленджа(или не увидели). Поделитесь эмоциями :з
🍂🍂🍂🍂
Завтра выберу победителя!
Если не успели что-то написать, you hav…
🤩 Ну че? Допрыгалась? 🤩
Guys, я вас тут заинтриговала немного с IELTS, но событий реально было много…
Сегодня вместо подкаста будет видео (можете его ускорить или слушать, как подкаст)
Рассказываю:
00:00 Как проходит письменный IELTS на пк
05:30 Что по адскому Writing?
07:20 Как прошла Speaking part?
08:37 Мои баллы позволят мне пройти в любой ВУЗ мира? Что за апелляция? Сколько стоит и зачем?
Всем, кто собирается…
выезжаем на IELTS!!!!
✅ доехать до Москвы
✅ пройти контроль в аэропорту так, чтобы не отобрали воду
✅ заказать кофе за миллион денег…
следующие шаги:
❌вылететь из России без задержек
- вылететь из России с задержкой в 2 часа
- прилететь в Армению
- заселиться и отдыхать
🎃31 октября - пойти на IELTS и затащить все на максималку!!!!!!!!!
я завалила пробник IELTS?
pov: ты уезжаешь уже завтра в Армению, а вместо С2, ты получаешь С1 и ошибку в слове Tuesday
кто, блин, вообще придумал Tuesday и Thursday????
короче, я пойду прогуляюсь и куплю себе кофе 🍓
что вы делаете, если баллы начинают падать перед экзаменом?
🌿Дроп для ЕГЭшников🌿
История России!!!!
Мои ребята стабильно сдают на 85+. А каждый третий сдает speaking на 20/20. Потому что я их готовлю ко всему 🥰
В 2027 ждите мнооого истории. Делюсь журналом с нужной лексикой и описанием важных событий.
Всем, кто сдает ЕГЭ, must read!!!
❤️А записаться в группу можно по ссылке в шапке или через @aspi_manager
до IELTS 4 дня
в четверг я уже уезжаю в Москву, пятница весь день в дороге до Еревана
в эти дни я планирую:
а) перейти на английский везде (подкасты, сериалы, книги)
б) устроить себе полноценный пробник на время (3ч)
в) с помощью ии повторить все слова, где за это время я совершала ошибки
г) отработать максимально странные темы
🍞вам когда-нибудь задавали 5 вопросов про хлеб? а мне да…
режим: тренировка-скуратов-р…
🍂Study with me challenge 🍂
(Day 10,11,12/19)
Guys, эту неделю уже работала на дисциплине😂Мотивашка челленджа ушла, но продолжаем идти стабильно
Среда:
🍂7:30-9:00 урок с группой из Калифорнии
🍂Writing part 2 - эссе
🍂Writing part 1 📊- 2 шт
🍂Writing part 1 📊- процессы
🍂Reading IELTS - 8.0 (C2)
Потом выдохлась и пошла в кофейню читать сумерки…
Четверг:
🍂Writing part - разбор 2 работ
🍂1,5ч урок для ЕГЭ
🍂1,5ч урок для г…
❤31🍓3custom 53955024917920636961
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @aspirantes_21. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Хочу поднять свой общий уровень языка (General English) 🙂64%
Планирую разговорить себя (speaking club) 🌟33%
Хочу подготовиться к событию (Собеседование, поездка и тп) 🪩7%
Планирую переезд!!! 🎧10%
The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Шерин Келли Английский ЕГЭ 2027 Умскул | ONE WAY to ЕГЭ @eng_sherin · 48,784 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
английский и котики / ЕГЭ 2027 / стадикэтс аик @englishandcats · 24,518 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 19 September 2026
Таня Шибитова | Английский ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @tanya_shibitova · 33,134 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 5 September 2026
LinguaTrip @linguatrip_channel · 34,063 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 3 September 2026
Иван Матюхин @ivnmat · 32,668 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
𝐋𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐮𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐦𝐞𝐬 @linguatimes · 54,637 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“aspirantes🌸” (@aspirantes_21), 8,990 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aspirantes_21.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.