Channel
@asphodelirium
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
175subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001707550307 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @asphodelirium |
| Created | 22 July 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/asphodelirium |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:40 | 175 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 175 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
238 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 142 | 59.7% | |
| custom 5452082823286528605 | 42 | 17.6% | |
| custom 5451799041912380273 | 21 | 8.82% | |
| custom 5452035415437513864 | 11 | 4.62% | |
| custom 5451842064599779192 | 6 | 2.52% | |
| custom 5452095063943321265 | 6 | 2.52% | |
| custom 5330528617380209642 | 5 | 2.10% | |
| custom 5452040582283169763 | 5 | 2.10% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 238reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2025 to 10 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @asphodelirium. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 December 2025 to 10 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ребятки, ивент уже завтра! палмдропов не будет, мц справа будет! но и цена теперь 400 ёшкин кот. жду всех безумнейше.
💯2custom 54518420645997791922custom 54520950639433212652custom 54520828232865286051
с юкидед хочу фит, есть у кого контакты его?
💯7
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 54517990419123802731
иНфОрМаЦиЯ aka дЕрЖу В кУрСе👍🏻👍🏻 если с организатором всё хорошо, то 11 июля в 13:00 в «подземке» (владивосток, ул. железнодорожный переулок, 3) будет проходить ивент NHK Battle; вход 600 рублей, но зато будет игорь мц справа и кирюха палмдропов ёмаё! притопывайте посмотреть на владивостокский батал рэп, ребятки, будет крута! плюс! 22 июля к вечеру прилечу с моими любимыми девчонками в москву буквально на пару дне…
💯6custom 54520354154375138643custom 54520950639433212652custom 54520405822831697631custom 54520828232865286051
да в целом как будто ивент заебись прошёл, ирл баттловые движухи это всегда мега кайф! огромнейшее спасибо ане вишысывил, соне рудидуди, даше хотеповне, тимуру августу, вите мэримэ и моим ребяткам с урзамухылзы (отдельно роме мц_бэтмену за то, что экстренно заменил моего отвалившегося оппонента) за поддержку, а также ребяткам с NHK и NBF за организацию в целом! да и моим придуркам дискордовским, что терпели все мои …
💯11
НЕКОТОРОЕ нишевое мероприятие..
custom 54520828232865286058💯4custom 54520405822831697634
всем ку, товарисчи! давненько я, конечно, нормально не выходил на связь, и, наверное, сейчас самое время; если вкратце, то всё самое угнетающее, что может происходить в жизни обычного русского рэпера, происходит и огромным комом катится всё дальше и дальше, впитывая в себя новые гадости и пакости (не радости). 1) последние месяцев 7 я потихоньку обрастал коннектами и общался с крутыми ребятками по всему миру, чтобы…
custom 54517990419123802738
ну мой!
💯7
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyq9oete6os wolfhunter music video
💯6
С ребятками немного почитаем русского народного рэпа вот прям вот здесь, приходите, увидимся!
custom 54517990419123802736
🎉ДОЖДАЛИСЬ, ТОВАРИЩИ!🎉 ПЕРВОЕ ВЫСТУПЛЕНИЕ РЭП-КОЛЛЕКТИВА УРЗАМУХЫЛЗЫ УЖЕ НА НОСУ, ДА ЕЩЁ И ВО ВЛАДИВОСТОКЕ. ВЕЛИКОЛЕПНЕЙШИЕ ДАМЫ И ГОСПОДА, МЫ СОБИРАЕМСЯ ПОПИТЬ ПИВА И ПОЧИТАТЬ РЕПА ВОЛШЕБНЫМ СУББОТНИМ ВЕЧЕРОМ В ПРЕКРАСНЕЙШЕМ УЮТНОМ МЕСТЕ, ПОДАРИВ ВАМ УЙМУ НЕЗАБЫВАЕМЫХ ЭМОЦИЙ И ВПЕЧАТЛЕНИЙ. А ТАК ЖЕ НЕКОТОРЫЕ РЕБЯТКИ ЗАЧИТАЮТ СВОИ СОЛЬНЫЕ ТРЕКИ: И ПОБЕСИМСЯ, И ВЗГРУСТНЁМ МАЛЕНЕЧКО. ПРИСОЕДИНЯЙТЕСЬ К НАМ, БУДЕТ ВЕСЕЛ…
custom 54517990419123802736
Хоть какой-либо контент и выходит очень редко, но реакциями накормил, товарисчи! 0 Самари (👍) на этом посте и я начинаю трясти своими булочками (так называемое написание русского рэпа).
custom 545208282328652860530custom 54520354154375138648custom 54518420645997791924
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @asphodelirium. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 932,014 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@asphodelirium named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ASPHODELIRIUM” (@asphodelirium), 175 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asphodelirium.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.