Channel
@askk_nav
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002267920252 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @askk_nav |
| Description | Задаём вопросы в анонке (ссылка в закрепе) |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 10 November 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/askk_nav |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 14 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 14 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
39 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💊 | 22 | 56.4% | |
| 💋 | 8 | 20.5% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 10.3% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 5.13% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 5.13% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 November 2024 to 29 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вообще изначально все случайно ахах. Потом начали замечать, что у основной тройки, у всех имена на букву К начинаются. Потом стало что то типо фишечкой и таким неким показанием, какие же сейчас подростки одинаковые 🙄🙄/ш К тому же выдумывать сложно что то. Во многих новеллах персы вообще супер пестрые, разные мол "дефолтик подростки". Но лично я с этим не особо согласна. Многие подростки безумно похожи друг на друга,…
❤1
💬 You have a new message! Оооа прикол заметила, у главной тройки персонажей (вроде как) голубые глаза!!! Это вы специально так, или случайно получилось? Ещё у двух девчонок этих блонд прям парный ↩️ Swipe to reply
Достаточно интересный вопрос. Нас покинуло достаточно много ребят, но многие были незначительными которые не сделали такого огромного вклада в игру. Было конечно очень обидно терять тех, кто с нами давно. Раньше я давала ребятам время на раздумье, но поняла что в этом нет никакого смысла, так что если люди хотят уйти, то я спокойно их отпускаю. Постараюсь вспомнить всех кто нас покидал. Последовательность уходов я н…
💬 You have a new message! Здравствуйте, у меня есть вопрос, а сколько человек покинуло вашу команду ?? Если сможете перечислить кто это. А так же как вы отнеслись к их уходу? ↩️ Swipe to reply
Ребятули давайте вопросиков там даа Мотыгушка хочкт поотвечать
🍓1😁1
Люди которые на нас подписаны с самого начала, думаю помнят что в начале вп поста было написано "Мы тринадцатилетние девочки.." и т.д. Раньше мы делали на этом акцент что бы не было вопросов, но когда образовалась команда, мы больше не нуждались в этой информации в вп посте.
💊3💋2
💬 You have a new message! сколько лет авторам новеллы, если не секрет?? ↩️ Swipe to reply
💊1
Раньше катсцены рисовала наша художница т.е. моя соавторша. Но к сожалению ей довольно трудно рисовать с нуля, а искать референсы нам было безумно трудно. Также хотелось что бы катсцены и главное меню было в одном стиле, так что нашли другого человека.
💋3💊2
💬 You have a new message! Кто рисовал до этого кат-сцены? (Если не секрет) ↩️ Swipe to reply
💊1
Да, обязательно! Уже нашли нового человека который перерисует главное меню и катсцены.
💊1💋1
💬 You have a new message! Будет ли перерисовка кат-сцен? ↩️ Swipe to reply
💊1
Идея с рисованием фонов была, но решили её все таки отбросить. А вот насчет новых фонов да. Сейчас мы в активном поиске новых фонов.
💊1💋1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @askk_nav. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 902,716 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Аск "Need a vacation"” (@askk_nav), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/askk_nav.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.