Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 妻妓俱樂部(重生)

Channel

妻妓俱樂部(重生)

@asianslutwifeclub

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

577subscribers

+195 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002458855694
TypeChannel
Username@asianslutwifeclub
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/asianslutwifeclub

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

382577479.57 August 2026 — 382 subscribers8 August 2026 — 382 subscribers16 August 2026 — 470 subscribers24 August 2026 — 501 subscribers31 August 2026 — 516 subscribers9 September 2026 — 554 subscribers17 September 2026 — 577 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 41 days, net +195. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 353–606 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 19:36577+23
9 Sept 2026, 23:00554+38
31 Aug 2026, 10:58516+15
24 Aug 2026, 01:14501+31
16 Aug 2026, 09:03470+88
8 Aug 2026, 06:05382no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:52382first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 13 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

157 reactions across 17 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7950.3%
🔥7145.2%
👌31.91%
👍21.27%
😈10.637%
😍10.637%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 13 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2026, 04:32 UTC≈1,040 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤4🔥4

6 Jul 2026, 04:45 UTC≈1,160 viewsread 8 August 2026

想試Ai的可用這個 https://t.me/AIVision1111_bot?start=6214352715 效果在免費中最好

5 Jul 2026, 04:52 UTC≈1,090 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

旧版本 文字有点密集

🔥11❤4😍1

2 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC≈1,080 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥6

30 Jun 2026, 09:58 UTC≈1,090 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

讓ai 弄成二次元 意外的色氣

❤2🔥2

29 Jun 2026, 12:51 UTC≈1,070 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

美女投稿 真實素人肉便器 被主人調教到天天挨操

❤8🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @asianslutwifeclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“妻妓俱樂部(重生)” (@asianslutwifeclub), 577 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asianslutwifeclub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.