#بودكاست_شقشقة | الإعتداء على فاطمة(ع) بالرواية السنّية • https://youtu.be/aMonrt1lt-Q?si=hTyKk_Xyt_7sh-bW ضيف الحلقة السيد محمد بدرالدين - لبنان #أحمد_صديق

Channel
أحمد صديق
@aseddiq
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
29,671subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001003693506 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @aseddiq |
| Created | Between 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/aseddiq |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:14 | 29,671 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:35 | 29,677 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:52 | 29,682 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:51 | 29,687 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:11 | 29,692 | -8 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 29,700 | +8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:07 | 29,692 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:41 | 29,690 | +14 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 29,676 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 1 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 23.4%
- avg views ÷ 29,671 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 6,930
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (1 April 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 27,730 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 14:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 10m 07s
- Average length
- 1m 01s
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
الآن على اليوتيوب .. #بودكاست_شقشقة استشهاد النبي ﷺ في الرواية الشيعية • https://youtu.be/7IJ-lmXNXJs?si=PhoTsYvHcg1ASZMu مع الضيف العزيز أبوكرار #علي_العجمي #أحمد_صديق
الإمام الرضا(ع) في قصر المأمون؟! الآن على اليوتيوب #بودكاست_شقشقة ضيف الحلقة سماحة الشيخ #أحمد_سلمان #أحمد_صديق • https://youtu.be/D0dNVWNMQY0?si=x7hdLkGnOq2nQYL0
صُلح الإمام الحسن(ع) مع معاوية ؟! الآن على اليوتيوب .. #بودكاست_شقشقة • https://youtu.be/1gO_QGUYlUk?si=hsSBRoJfr1plpA72 ضيف الحلقة سماحة السيد #كاظم_الخرسان مدير مركز الإمام الحسن (ع) للدراسات التخصصية التابع إلى الأمانة العامة للعتبة الحُسينيّة المُقدّسة
الآن على اليوتيوب #مسير_السبايا #بودكاست_شقشقة • https://youtu.be/CZ0Ub_pmADY?si=Lv4duQPM_jkT-pHb لا تشاهد هذا البودكاست إلا إذا أردت أن تبكي
ببركة السيدة المعصومة عليها السلام، تم ترجمة رواية إليزابيث في كربلاء إلى اللغة الإنجليزية، وهذا هو الملف بصيغة PDF جاهز للنشر. انشروه لمن يحتاجه...
Novel: #Elizabeth_In_Karbala Elizabeth is a nun devoted to spreading the Christian faith. She opposes everything associated with Islam and Muslims. Then, one day, her eyes fell upon the name of Imam Husain (peace be upon him). From that single moment, the letters of his name changed her life forever.
كتاب مقتل الإمام الحسين عليه السلام، اقرأوه استعدادًا لليلة العاشر
كتابي “كورونا الخير؟!” بين أيديكم حين أُغلِقَت الأبواب، وتوقّف كلّ شيء، ظنّ البعض أن المسير إلى الحسين عليه السلام قد انقطع… لكنَّ الأرواح التي تعلّقت بخدمته، وجدت في كل زاوية من الألم طريقًا جديدًا للولاء. هذا الكتاب لا يحدّثك عن جائحةٍ عبرَت، بل عن يقظةٍ وُلدَت. عن النعمة حين تُسلب، والفرصة حين تُكتشف تحت ركام الحرمان. عن ذلك الشعور القاسي حين لا ينعى الناعي، ولا يُرفع مأتم، ولا يُفتح باب حسينية… وعن ذلك القرار ا…
قريبًا .. إصداري الخامِس #أجر_محمد .. تعلن #دار_السيدة_خديجة عليها السلام عن افتتاحها بطباعة الإصدار الخامس لِـ #أحمد_صديق ، والبِداية قطعًا لا يُمكن أن تكون إلا من سيد الكائنات النبي محمد المصطفى ﷺ، ونسأل من الله ﷻ التوفيق في خدمة الدّين والمذهب ونشرِ عُلوم أهل البيت عليهم السلام .. سيكون الإصدار متوفّر في المكتبات العربية في أكثر من دولة بإذن الله.. حساب الدار: https://www.instagram.com/dar__khadijah?igsh=OHF1cm…
الحلقة الثانية من #مغامرات_جواد_وعباس ( رحلة في اليخت ) .. لمشاهدة: https://youtu.be/mEiKb31w75Y?si=OzhAcTaVh7tNLQ5H يمكنكم مشاهدتها الآن مع أبنائكم في قناة #أبناء_خديجة عليها السلام على اليوتيوب ..
Voice message, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @aseddiq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 116,033 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@saif_bk_313 · 1,6542 postsresistant ¹²³.
@ak313ae · 281 postملجأ
@Al_Mahdi_313m · 981 postعلي أحمد
@aliahmedalemara · 471 post" درُب اليـاسمـين "
@ghad18 · 711 postMishaal
@mishaal_133 · 3991 postوردٌ ورصاص
@mo_99mh · 711 postعلي المولى
@mu1324M · 481 postوأَنْ تُلْهِمَنِي ذِكْرَكَ 🌿
@ZTmahdi313 · 261 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“أحمد صديق” (@aseddiq), 29,671 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aseddiq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.