Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
Channel
@asdfgwertyi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,163subscribers
-9 since we began measuring on 19 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003334097487 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @asdfgwertyi |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 19 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/asdfgwertyi |
Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 1,163 | -8 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:36 | 1,171 | +1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 02:21 | 1,170 | +4 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 1,166 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 16:23 | 1,170 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 1,171 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 1,170 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 1,165 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 1,171 | -1 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 1,172 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 8 | 80.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
温州鸥海港隆广场
外出瑞安3P,双人包夜正常服务
Photo, posted without a caption
不秒回,加QQ3549908083才找到我QQ799629906,打QQ语音通话铃声很大秒接,娇娇开课,三通SM,偏重度,可上门,可以夜,有工作室,
加QQ799629906
❤1
3p包夜正常服务,带上你兄弟,限制一人3次各1500.开酒店才去
特价比平时便宜了,包夜1200正常服务,限制三次,12点开始,8.30小时左右
Photo, posted without a caption
❤3
1号,,600一次正常全套,2号,,三通一次加正常全套共收1200,3号,,4号,,sm收共1600.90分钟可两次,5号,,sm十st共收1800'100分钟可两次,
特服夜不参加活,sm25,st25,sm十st30.,正常服务20张11点开始,外出车费另外十1张,,,,,特价活动,1200张夜不讲价.都是12点左右开始,8个多小时左右,具体要来先联系。正常服务限制三次。外出白天要付定金,我白天好补觉,因为坐车时间特别久,如果是比较远的地方,不然外出不了
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @asdfgwertyi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“娇娇” (@asdfgwertyi), 1,163 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asdfgwertyi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.