Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

AsanFillter - آسان فیلتر

@asanfillter

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,326subscribers

+76 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002073938983
TypeChannel
Username@asanfillter
Description📌 تنها کانال رسمی آسان فیلتر 🔶 گروه رفع مشکلات https://t.me/asanfillter_group 🔷 آدرس کانال یوتوب https://www.youtube.com/@AsanFillter_FA 💎 آیدی جهت ارتباط (برای ارسال ایده، همکاری و تبلیغات) @hamedrn
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/asanfillter

Growth

14,25014,32614,2886 August 2026 — 14,250 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,253 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,281 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,275 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,279 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,287 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,304 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,307 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,320 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,326 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 9 days, net +76. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,239–14,337 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 10:0914,326+6
14 Aug 2026, 03:4714,320+13
12 Aug 2026, 22:0514,307+3
11 Aug 2026, 21:5314,304+17
10 Aug 2026, 23:0214,287+8
9 Aug 2026, 19:4114,279+4
8 Aug 2026, 19:0714,275-6
7 Aug 2026, 21:3814,281+28
6 Aug 2026, 20:5514,253+3
6 Aug 2026, 08:1614,250first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
47.0%
avg views ÷ 14,326 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,730
24 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.861%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
24
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026
Posts held25 (15 July 202614 August 2026)
Views total161,490
Reactions total1,391
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 10:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
330
Videos
3
Links
235

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,391 reactions across 24 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣98670.9%
👍20815.0%
💔1168.34%
❤‍🔥433.09%
👏322.30%
😁60.431%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,548reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 15:48 UTC≈1,800 views100 reactionsread 15 August 2026

فیلترچی جان یه فکری بکن 😂 VPN رایگان چرا وصله؟ یه اختلالی چیزی بنداز روشون

🤣91👏5❤‍🔥4

Signed Hamed

14 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈1,850 views34 reactionsread 15 August 2026

✈️ امروز تلگرام 13 ساله شد!

❤‍🔥27🤣5👏2

Signed Hamed

14 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC≈2,060 views56 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

📩 یه اپلیکیشن جالب برای iOS به اسم Carrier Pigeon ساخته شده که برخلاف پیام‌رسان‌های معمولی، پیام‌ها رو فوری ارسال نمیکنه، بلکه هر پیام رو با یه «کبوتر نامه‌بر دیجیتالی» به مقصد میفرسته. سرعت پرواز این کبوتر مجازی حدود ۱۷۷ کیلومتر در ساعته. برای همین اگه طرف مقابل نزدیک شما باشه، پیام تو چند ثانیه میرسه اما اگه فاصله زیاد باشه، ممکنه تحویلش ساعت‌ها یا حتی چند روز طول بکشه. البته یه احتمال خیلی کم برای گم شدن کبوتره

🤣52👏4

Signed Hamed

11 Aug 2026, 23:36 UTC≈3,420 views157 reactionsread 15 August 2026

باور کنید یا نه، هنوز تعداد قابل‌توجهی از دیتاسنترهای داخلی ایران به اینترنت بین‌الملل دسترسی ندارن! 😂

🤣132💔13👍12

Signed Hamed

8 Aug 2026, 18:17 UTC≈6,140 views47 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🚨 ضریب 2.2 برابر اینترنت بین‌الملل فیبر صبانت طبق گزارش و تست انجام‌شده توسط یکی از کاربران، به‌نظر میاد مصرف اینترنت بین‌الملل صبانت با ضریب حدود ۲ برابر محاسبه میشه. برای مثال، در یک تست حدود ۱.۹ گیگابایت مصرف واقعی ثبت شده، اما در پنل صبانت حدود ۴.۸ گیگابایت از حجم کاربر کسر شده. 🔴 همچنین گفته شده بسته‌های صبانت هم اخیراً از ۵۰۰ گیگ به ۳۰۰ گیگ کاهش پیدا کرده، در حالی که قیمت همون ۱.۲ میلیون تومان باقی مونده. ⚠

💔43👍4

Signed Hamed

7 Aug 2026, 08:07 UTC≈5,380 views112 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ضریب ۱۵ دبی رو ندیده بودیم، که دیدیم. 💪

🤣112

Signed Hamed

6 Aug 2026, 16:06 UTC≈5,410 views95 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🚨 کلاه برداری سایت bitvps.io حتماً این پست رو بخونید که گرفتار نشید. امروز برای خرید سرور اختصاصی از سایت bitvps.io اقدام کردیم. (حداقل مبلغ شارژ حساب رو ۳۰ دلار گذاشته) بعد از پرداخت، به‌جای اینکه موجودی فعال بشه، پیام میده که واریزی شما تأیید نشده و باید با پشتیبانی تماس بگیرید چون کاربر جدید هستید. 😨 حالا جالب اینجاست که وقتی می‌خوای تیکت ثبت کنی، اجازه نمیده! پیام میده که اول باید یک VPS بسازید. یعنی برای ساخت

🤣68👍19💔8

Signed Hamed

4 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC≈6,170 views76 reactionsread 15 August 2026

🔹 دیتاسنتر منیجیت اعلام کرده که دسترسی به بعضی پورت‌های مهم، مثل پورت ۲۲، روی آیپی‌های ایران به سمت اینترنت بین‌الملل از طرف زیرساخت محدود شده. ظاهرا زیرساخت برای اعمال یک قطعی گسترده در حالت آماده‌باشه.

🤣66👍10

Signed Hamed

4 Aug 2026, 17:14 UTC≈5,610 views75 reactionsread 15 August 2026

روبیکا، با قطعی گسترده روبرو شده. 🙈

🤣71❤‍🔥3👏1

Signed Hamed

4 Aug 2026, 14:50 UTC≈5,950 views19 reactionsread 15 August 2026

از چه سرویس رفع تحریم و کاهش پینگ استفاده می‌کنید؟ 🧐

🤣16😁3

Signed Hamed

4 Aug 2026, 01:37 UTC≈6,760 views25 reactionsread 15 August 2026

پشتیبانی اپل گفت تلگرام هنوز توی سیستم‌های داخلی اپل هست و به‌عنوان برنامه حذف‌شده هم ثبت نشده. به گفته اون‌ها، احتمالاً خود توسعه‌دهنده تلگرام موقتاً برنامه رو از اپ‌استور مخفی یا از دسترس خارج کرده، چون همچنان داخل زیرساخت اپل وجود داره.

👍25

Signed Hamed

4 Aug 2026, 01:23 UTC≈6,030 views28 reactionsread 15 August 2026

تلگرام از اپ‌استور حذف شد! 💪

💔28

Signed Hamed

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @asanfillter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 14,710 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Hiddify
@hiddify · 123,129
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026
عصر نوین| AminiYT
@asrnovin_ir · 151,111
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 12 August 2026
Mahsa Net
@mahsa_net · 135,900
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AsanFillter - آسان فیلتر” (@asanfillter), 14,326 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asanfillter.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.