Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝑱𝒐𝒏𝒊 𝒎𝒂'💘🫂

Channel

𝑱𝒐𝒏𝒊 𝒎𝒂'💘🫂

@asalayy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,512subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001911287632
TypeChannel
Username@asalayy
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/asalayy

Growth

1,5041,5181,51114 August 2026 — 1,514 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,518 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,512 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,506 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,504 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,512 subscribers1,51214 August 202628 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 14 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,502–1,520 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 09:441,512+8
25 Aug 2026, 17:041,504-2
22 Aug 2026, 21:141,506-6
19 Aug 2026, 00:531,512-6
15 Aug 2026, 18:281,518+4
14 Aug 2026, 18:331,514first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 20 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.16%
avg views ÷ 1,512 subscribers
Avg views / post
123
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held17 (20 March 202613 August 2026)
Views total370
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Aug 2026, 18:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
6
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 17 we hold a reading for · 12%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @asalayy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 March 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 23:36 UTC107 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @Bmmmmm10Photo

«Иногда любовь — это просто смотреть вслед человеку и молчать о том, как сильно его любишь.» . @mxbb10 ✅

13 Aug 2026, 23:36 UTC106 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @Bmmmmm10Voice message

скучаю ли я по тебе? «да, ты постоянно в моих мыслях, даже когда я среди множества людей. я думаю о тебе перед сном и сразу после пробуждения. моя тоска не безделья, а от настоящей потребности в тебе, ведь ты моя незаменимая часть»..❤️

23 Jun 2026, 22:13 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

ᴏнᴀ ᴄᴛᴀнᴇᴛ иᴄᴨыᴛᴀниᴇʍ ᴛʙᴏᴇᴦᴏ ᴛᴇᴩᴨᴇния, ᴀ ᴇᴄᴧи ʙыдᴇᴩжиɯь - ᴨᴩичинᴏй ᴛʙᴏᴇᴦᴏ ᴄчᴀᴄᴛья.➰

19 May 2026, 16:40 UTC≈2,120 viewsread 14 August 2026
Voice message

Мы ᴏбᴀ ɜнᴀᴇʍ, чᴛᴏ ᴏᴄᴛᴀᴧиᴄь ʙᴏᴨᴩᴏᴄы. Нᴀдᴇюᴄь, ᴋᴏᴦдᴀ-нибудь у нᴀᴄ будᴇᴛ ɯᴀнᴄ их ɜᴀдᴀᴛь ) 💔

19 May 2026, 16:32 UTC≈2,040 viewsread 14 August 2026
Photo

𝗖𝗵𝗶𝘇𝗲𝗿𝗮 𝘁𝗼 𝗮𝘆 𝗱𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶 𝗯𝗮 𝗾𝗮𝗱𝗿𝘀𝗵 𝗻𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘀𝗶.🖤

17 Apr 2026, 09:34 UTC≈2,640 views0 reactions2 Starsread 14 August 2026
Voice message

ʙыбᴇᴩи ᴛᴏᴦᴏ, ᴋᴛᴏ бᴏиᴛᴄя ᴛᴇбя ᴨᴏᴛᴇᴩяᴛь’💗

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @asalayy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,259,550 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝑱𝒐𝒏𝒊 𝒎𝒂'💘🫂” (@asalayy), 1,512 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asalayy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.