Channel
@asadki
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
31subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001207698149 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @asadki |
| Description | Будни дизайнера 🧐 Искренне делюсь переживаниями, наблюдениями, достижениями и всякими полезностями |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/asadki |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 31 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 31 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 9 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (28 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 174 |
| Reactions total | 10 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐳 | 4 | 40.0% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 30.0% | |
| 💅 | 3 | 30.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Friend запустила серию, коротких, рекламных роликов снятый на пленку Ektachrome с аналоговым звуком, 20-летним режиссером к выходу устройства, версии 2.0 если забывъ, что такое Friend – воть Думается мне, что это шаги в сторону про активного слушателя, который всегда будет знать контекст твоей жизни и позволит тебе делать больше, но какая титаническая работа потребуется, чтобы в обществе стало нормальным говорить…
Signed Asadus
Почему это уже не кажется такой безумной идеей? 🕊️
Signed Asadus
я вроде как динозавр 🦖 но меня никогда не было в линкедин столько хейта, поноса и издевательств продолжаю слышать в их адрес и в этом году я решил залететь туда и глянуть что это за субстанция первое на что обратил внимания – насколько нечеловечный подход к описанию поста, будто продукт не хочет, чтобы писали, либо пару слов и хватит фокус на фото и видео второе – эпидемия нейрослопа сильнейшим образом поразила…
🐳1
Signed Asadus
зай, когда ты перестала носить джинсы, я открыл тебя совершенно с новой стороны. Тебя окутала магия таинственности и женственности ✨
🐳1
Signed Asadus
как же мне нравится, как Kanishka пересобрала себя в социальных площадках ушли от нейтрального фона для продуктов и начали снимать живые кадры, в приятных глазу локациях, подчеркивая локальный колорит не побоюсь этого громкого высказывания: Kanishka – один из важнейших брендов для культуры страны
💅3
Signed Asadus
важнейшая новость этой недели — Яндекс Панорамы обновились до 2026 года но шави еще не открылся хехе😄 зай, так лень выходить седня вечером, давай онлайн покатаемся по городу вжжж
👏3
Signed Asadus
Девушка потратила 2 недели и 56 наклеек для клавиатуры MacBook, чтобы создать себе кастомную юбку Радуюсь таким изобретательным людям 💅
🐳1
Signed Asadus
Потрясающий тейк Кристофера Нолана о том, что благодаря здоровому скептицизму мы получим лучшее от новых технологий 🌟 Не сама технология важна, а что она дает? Вместо: «мы создали клип, рекламу, фильм с помощью ИИ» Должно быть: Мы открываем новое направление и будем создавать клипы, рекламу, фильмы. А какими инструментами мы будем пользоваться – это уже сами решим. Наша важнейшая цель сможем ли мы вас растрогать?…
🐳1
Signed Asadus
Погружение в контекст и фактчекинг теперь доступны в Threads с помощью Meta AI, когда нажимаешь на «три точки» в правом, верхнем углу каждого поста Плюсик для человечества И возможная лазейка для смм-команды, интересно, как можно это превратить в интерактив? Хмм.. заставляет задуматься 🤫🧠👈
Signed Asadus
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @asadki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,093,879 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Асадки надвигаются” (@asadki), 31 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/asadki.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.