Channel
@as797p
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
23,765subscribers
-83 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002009922856 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @as797p |
| Created | 8 April 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/as797p |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 13:04 | 23,765 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 23,770 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 23,781 | -20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:11 | 23,801 | -26 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 23,827 | -21 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 23,848 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 8 April 2024 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
130 reactions across 5 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 94 | 72.3% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 10.8% | |
| 😭 | 9 | 6.92% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 2.31% | |
| 😘 | 3 | 2.31% | |
| 🌚 | 2 | 1.54% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 1.54% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.769% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.769% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.769% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 8 April 2024 to 7 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#永久解双向的文本 Dear Administrator, I am writing to appeal the ban on my account (banned on January 17, 2026) for violating harassment and spam policies. I take full responsibility for my actions and deeply apologize for any harm caused. I understand the importance of maintaining a safe platform, and I fully support your efforts to enforce rules against malicious users. This was a mistake, and I have reflected on it ser…
❤25👍8
#会员帐号秒解双向限制教程 1.点击 @SpamBot 开始对话，并按照顺序点击以下内容 2. /start 3. OK 4. /start 5. Cool，Thanks 会员号秒解双向如图所示
🌚2
#普通账号解除双向限制教程 📣如果你被双向，只有两种可能‼️ 1.使用中国大陆手机号注册的号 2.说明广告打多了，或者向陌生人打招呼过多，系统对你的一种限制，严重者会禁止在公开群内说话或者封号 如何查看自己禁封多久❓ 随便发一个信息给陌生人，系统弹出你双向的同时，旁边有个详情~点击详情会跳转到官方机器人~点击下面开始~系统回复的是英文~用微信或者其他翻译软件可以翻译英文自己查看原因与时间，如果提示你没有限制，像小鸟一样自由，这种就可以解除掉，根据提示一步一步操作，最后回复原因时输入： （点击可以复制粘贴） accident 针对部分用户无法发起私聊解决办法： 解双向教程：时间限制的等待时间结束，永久的自己看教程 👉第一步：搜索 @spambot 👉第二步：点击 Start 👉第三步：点击This is a mistake 👉第四部：点击yes 👉第五步：点击 No,I'll never do any of th…
❤44😭9👍4🔥2🤮1🥰1
#账号冻结申诉步骤方法 第一步：点击 ：@spambot 第二步：点击：This is a mistake 第三步：点击：Yes 第四步：回复：（点击可以复制） My account is running well, I don't understand what I did to violate the rules. I subscribed to 1 Premium this morning, but my account was frozen as soon as the membership arrived. I don't understand why, please help me unfreeze it. My account is very important to me. Thank you 第五步：回复：飞机昵称 或 号码 第六步：回复：输入能接码的邮箱（不一定需要接码） 第七步： 问你注册时间,根…
❤16🖕3😘3👏1
后续更新频道 @hhhhp
❤9👍2
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @as797p. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“双向限制解除教程” (@as797p), 23,765 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/as797p.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.