Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for артилерія!

Channel

артилерія!

@artyleriya

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,624subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001424875128
TypeChannel
Username@artyleriya
Created12 November 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/artyleriya

Growth

3,6243,6303,6277 August 2026 — 3,630 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,630 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,629 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,630 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,624 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,623–3,631 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 17:463,624-6
13 Aug 2026, 00:333,630+1
10 Aug 2026, 08:133,629-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:413,630no change
7 Aug 2026, 03:013,630first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.1%
avg views ÷ 3,624 subscribers
Avg views / post
911
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.68%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 March 20262 August 2026)
Views total1,821
Reactions total67
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

759 reactions across 20 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
55372.9%
❤‍🔥587.64%
💋567.38%
🔥314.08%
💘151.98%
🥰81.05%
👏50.659%
💔50.659%
40.527%
🍓40.527%
🏆40.527%
👍40.527%
🕊40.527%
🐳30.395%
🌚20.264%
🍾10.132%
💯10.132%
😢10.132%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 759reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 March 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 20 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artyleriya. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 March 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC621 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

уривочок // а хто скаже із усіма цими малими хлопчиками і кількістю вміщених в них світових страждань що має робити антипросвітлене моє невеличке я?

20👏5🔥2

27 Jul 2026, 19:41 UTC≈1,200 views40 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

знаєш, що береться холодом найшвидше? найтепліше і як на зло ніхто не навчив мене не ставити гарячі кастрюлі у холодильник до того ж я не маю сили спинити чужий холод у собі і не морозити ним все навколо мої руки тягнуться до хлопчика і ведуть його за собою у крижаний палац тягнуться і до дівчинки на ходу її сльози замерзають мої довгі руки ще довшими крижаними пальцями збирають сльозинки і всаджують собі на буси н

31❤‍🔥5💔3😢1

15 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC≈1,420 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

щоденниково нецензуроване і з матюками))) сум жалить мене медузою. всі ми знаємо, який нехитрий метод варто б застосовувати в таких випадках)), але я так не можу. натомість лишаюсь в морі і підставляю шкіру під нові і нові тільця без мозку. коли шкіра пече, принаймні не варто шукати сенсів — все очевидно — треба навчитися перестати відчувати цей біль. є що висублімовувати у текст — їбись воно конем — скільки можна

21👍4💔2

10 Jul 2026, 13:11 UTC≈1,400 views56 reactions2 Starsread 7 August 2026

я викроюю із себе штиль ходи по мені проклади мною дорогу до себе шкірою спеченою моя сіль темніша за колір неба поміж стегнами у кожній із моїх хвиль вирізаю відблиски тебе

43🔥64🐳3

10 Jul 2026, 13:11 UTC≈1,270 views27 reactionsread 7 August 2026

на світанку в Одесі підслухала, як море сонцю писало вірш

24🔥3

12 Jun 2026, 18:50 UTC≈2,070 views50 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026

маленька буденність розділена крапкою з комою! ти не слухаєш моєї музики без мене, бо не хочеш вриватися у мій простір без мого дозволу; ми йдемо до мене додому босі, навіть не по калюжах, а по ріці, яка від них утворюється по вулиці Гончара; ми спимо по обіді, бо о 6 ранку нам не спалося з очевидних чи не дуже очевидних причин; я всучую тобі почитати Домонтовича і ти кажеш, що він надто очевидно викаблучуюється

45🕊4💋1

20 May 2026, 15:30 UTC≈2,040 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026

хто навчив тебе боятися? хто навчив мене лякати? орнаментом між нами лягає спальня коли ти засинаєш мені пригадуються усі чужі кістки з більшим вмістом кальцію що я їх не змогла продірявити підточеними зубами комусь треба боятися щоби з поліетиленових дверей моєї порцелянової спальні сочилося крихке і непевне бажання будь хоробрішим і бійся замість мене підставляй свою вразливість витрушуватиму її крізь моє гостре

52💘6💋3❤‍🔥1

15 May 2026, 21:36 UTC≈1,940 views62 reactionsread 7 August 2026

я відправляю клаптик себе у Німеччину кудись під Кьольн це краща моя частинка краща-моя-частинка без мене, на жаль, скурюється — ну а кому нині легко? ще один клаптик подався від мене через Кишинів до Лондона ну не від мене особисто щодо мене цей клаптик не мав жодних упереджень просто Лондон was waiting та і все тут ніхто ні в чому не винен (принаймні так писав Жадан а я схильна довіритися йому у цьому нелегкому

51💋5🥰3🍓1💘1🔥1

15 May 2026, 21:36 UTC≈1,470 views22 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сартр сказав писати на одному подиху, не добираючи слів ну і я написала:

20🥰2

28 Apr 2026, 19:01 UTC≈1,300 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

фрагменти ніжно романтічні!

5

28 Apr 2026, 19:01 UTC≈2,020 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026

it feels like I was always dating little girls and you are a woman ти дивишся і все у мені перевертається стою поруч і стаю маленька, кажу знічено, що соромлюся — мене? — тебе така красива так вправно граєш у цей ідіотський більярд я тільки кліпаю і не можу забити жодної кульки я вмію грати у більярд!! чесно! просто не коли хтось одягнений у чорну сорочку — господи ця твоя чорна сорочка — приобіймаєш мене ззаду,

59💋7❤‍🔥4🔥2💘1

17 Apr 2026, 18:51 UTC≈1,820 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

24.04 • пʼятниця • 19:00 "Давай зробимо це втрьох" — любовний трикутник між чуттєвою Вірою Незламною, абсурдним Максимом Албулом і екстравагантною Лєрою Артилерією. Чим завершиться вечір? Бійкою чи коханням? Врешті-решт, хто з них кого любить? І чи фігурує взагалі любов у цьому тріо? Артисти поділилися, що насправді, для того, аби "зробити це втрьох" — їм потрібні ви! Приходьте! Сподіваємося, хтось з вас працює ме

22💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @artyleriya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,114,545 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“артилерія!” (@artyleriya), 3,624 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artyleriya.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.