Channel
@artsommelier
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
5,403subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002412274757 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @artsommelier |
| Description | Обратная связь: @nzmnzn #NH54U |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artsommelier |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 16:31 | 5,403 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 5,405 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 5,410 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:25 | 5,410 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 4 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
46 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 15 | 32.6% | |
| ❤ | 13 | 28.3% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 19.6% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 6.52% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 4.35% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 2.17% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 2.17% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 46reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2025 to 28 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqwyJeb8 | 1 | 24 October 2025 | 24 October 2025 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2025 to 28 June 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Современное искусство - агрессивно? Сегодня услышала интересное впечатление о прошедшей весной Венецианской биеннале: «Почему современное искусство постоянно что-то декларирует? Куда ушло сердце самого понятия - красота?» И действительно, современное искусство постоянно провоцирует, доказывает, протестует, тестирует границы, но почти не показывает самую простую бытовую жизнь. Конечно, можно сослаться на эволюцию. …
👍2❤1🔥1
Channel name was changed to «Перерыв на искусство»
Щегол - как маленькая картина XVII века стала одним из главных романов XXI? «Щегол» Карела Фабрициуса - крошечная работа: птица, прикованная цепочкой к кормушке. Почти камерный этюд. В 1654 году художник погиб при взрыве порохового склада в Делфте. Большая часть его работ исчезла. «Щегол» выжил случайно. Картина пережила своего автора - и спустя три с половиной века стала центром культового романа Донны Тартт. Тар…
👍4❤3💯2🔥2🎉1👏1🥰1
Channel name was changed to «Нескучное искусство»
Мы недавно всей реакцией спорили, выбирая вино в подарок главреду. Франция, Италия, Новый Свет — всё перебрали, пока вдруг кто-то не заявил, что это крайне непатриотично. Что чистая правда. Но получается, что в своём родном мы пока не особо-то разбираемся — кроме Ведерникова и Галицкого никто не вспомнил ничего. Так что давайте-ка исправляться. Тем более что Simple Wine News упростили нам жизнь, выпустив третий еже…
❤1
Арт-объект, посвящённый сорту винограда Санджовезе в Тоскане еще можно увидеть до конца октября Скульптура появилась этим летом на винодельне Castello di Meleto в тосканском регионе Гайоле-ин-Кьянти и посвящена сорту Санджовезе. Castello di Meleto - это самая большая органическая компания в зоне Кьянти Классико, которая принимает гостей с 1256 года, и здесь традиции виноделия живут на каждом шагу. Трехметровая буты…
❤1👍1🔥1
Ручной сбор винограда - это элитарность. Интересно, заменят ли это когда-нибудь роботы?
👍1🔥1
Досмотрела замечательные серии проекта РБК «Время вина» (доступны на youtube) о российском виноделии. Хотя я давно понимаю, что миф о том, что «у нас хорошего вина нет», уже устарел, меня не перестает удивлять смелость и инноваторство наших соотечественников. Особенно впечатляет, когда я вижу винодельни в таких, казалось бы, неочевидных регионах, как Волгоградская и Ростовская области. Как говорят, чтобы вино было п…
❤1💯1
Есть ли «правильное» понимание ароматов вина? Почему я не чувствую то, что описывают сомелье? Да, существует целая система: колёса ароматов, классификации, группы, профессиональный язык сомелье. Это рабочий инструмент, именно по нему оценивают вина на конкурсах, определяют стиль и происхождение. Это своего рода универсальный язык винного мира. Но почему тогда я чувствую что-то совсем другое? Конечно, бывают стадии,…
❤3
Зашла в новости искусства за вдохновением и увидела, что ограбили Лувр. Лувр! В 2025 году. Как это возможно? UPD: пишут, что ограбили всего за 7 минут
🤔2
Я сегодня узнала, что на одной из виноделен в ЮАР есть работа, где человек целый день ездит на велосипеде с белым флагом и отгоняет павианов от винограда. Белые флаги также развешаны среди рядов виноградников, чтобы создать впечатление о большом количестве людей и отпугнуть диких обитателей. Когда устану от городской корпоративной среды - знаю куда отправлять резюме.
👍3😁1
Девочки, кто устал или просто хочет вдохновения? Присоединяйтесь к каналу, мы здесь мечтаем, разговариваем, наслаждаемся атмосферными видео и просто отдыхаем. Ссылка на канал "Не беспокоить, я мечтаю!" здесь: https://t.me/experiencecollection
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @artsommelier. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Идем туда?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 September 2025 to 28 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Перерыв на искусство” (@artsommelier), 5,403 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artsommelier.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.