Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for artpacan +

Channel

artpacan +

@artpacan

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,260subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001131829096
TypeChannel
Username@artpacan
Created21 November 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/artpacan

Growth

7,2607,2687,2646 August 2026 — 7,268 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,268 subscribers6 August 2026 — 7,266 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,264 subscribers13 August 2026 — 7,263 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,260 subscribers6 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 11 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,259–7,269 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 22:137,260-3
13 Aug 2026, 15:567,263-1
10 Aug 2026, 08:107,264-2
6 Aug 2026, 22:007,266-2
6 Aug 2026, 03:077,268no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:097,268first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 November 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,961 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🍌86544.1%
🫡71636.5%
19710.0%
🔥1316.68%
❤‍🔥311.58%
👏160.816%
😁40.204%
🤮10.051%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,961reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2022 to 31 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Dec 2023, 20:00 UTC≈11,100 views223 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🫡223

31 Dec 2023, 20:00 UTC≈9,680 views298 reactionsread 12 August 2026

​MAGNUM OPPOZZ Что ж, этот день настал. С самого начала этот канал был создан не с целью стать упрощённой арт-энциклопедией для ленивых или тупых, но быть импульсом, своеобразной прививкой от страха и лени перед изучением самого важного и загадочного проявления человеческого ума и рук — изобразительного искусства. И я очень хочу надеяться, что есть хотя бы горстка людей, для которых я стал тем парнем, который помог

🫡298

24 Sept 2023, 09:00 UTC≈11,900 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кинематографичная сновиденческая живопись от меланхоличного бухарестского экс-рейвера? Почему бы и да. https://teletype.in/@artpacan/remusgrecu

🍌34

23 Sept 2023, 13:17 UTC≈9,770 views97 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @alekayloza

Я интеллектуал и искусствовед в наиболее громоздком смысле этих слов. Я был в музеях (всех), сидел в органном зале (40 минут), курил на могиле Канта (думая). Я произносил слово «трансцендентально» столько раз, что оно почти стало моей фамилией. Я пил на брудершафт и терпел в бассейнах. Я делал красиво — ради искусства и чтобы понравиться девочкам. Поэтому со всей ответственностью могу заявить, что если современное и

🍌96🫡1

23 Sept 2023, 13:17 UTC≈7,150 views38 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Искусство постмодерна сделало круг и замкнулось на парадигме дикарей, хули.

🍌38

17 Sept 2023, 09:02 UTC≈8,110 views49 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Ух, сегодня жёсткий британский современный живописец-фигуративист наваливает апокалиптичные вайбы и подъёбывает социум своей неоднозначной сатирой в мрачных тонах, вау. https://teletype.in/@artpacan/justinmortimer

🍌48🫡1

10 Sept 2023, 09:02 UTC≈8,190 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пацаны, я нашёл (и рассказал в статье) о художнице, у которой очень оригинальное отношение к фольге. После прочтения холодные вечера с тёплыми ребятами обретут новое метафизическое измерение, отвечаю. https://teletype.in/@artpacan/teodoraaxente

🍌32

3 Sept 2023, 09:00 UTC≈8,600 views39 reactionsread 12 August 2026

На дворе уже осень, а это лучшее время повайбить от мрачной фигуративной живописи молдавского художника Александра Тинея. https://teletype.in/@artpacan/alexandertinei

🍌39

3 Sept 2023, 09:00 UTC≈7,010 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хохмить над историей искусства — это, конечно, здорово (если вы не ебаный сноб), потому что угарать над далёкими проблемами и приключениями людей, живших двести, триста, а то и все пятьсот лет назад, невероятно весело и легко. Но когда речь заходит о живых, современных и серьёзных художниках (особенно фигуративистах), которые изображают, пускай и своеобразно, нашу реальность, умудряясь тонко вплести в свои работы ак

🍌43

27 Aug 2023, 09:00 UTC≈7,190 views88 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Здарова, богачи. Тем, кто на голяках — соболезную, как себе. Я говорил, что мучу по жести на бусти? Говорил, но давно. Сейчас вот напоминаю. О чём же новый премиум тексток? А вот хуй я вам расскажу. Сами посмотрите, когда оформите подписочку. Скажу только, что это не просто лонгрид про очередного талантливого челика, неее. Это, бля, почти 50к символов комплексного, информативного, качественного и весёлого текста, кот

🍌88

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @artpacan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 710,213 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“artpacan +” (@artpacan), 7,260 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artpacan.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.