Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥5

Channel
@artofwar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
7,330subscribers
+1,529 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003361296993 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @artemvoinov @artofwar |
| Description | First Channel about Marketing in Web3 & Crypto ⚠️ Our chat: https://t.me/+pywk3_s9VKg5NzRh No trading. No Hype. No ads. 🏴☠️ by Artem Voinov (@avicoda / @Artem_ICODA) — CBDO ICODA.io and part of STIVE.ai (Top-3 Crypto & Web3 Agency in World 🌎 ) |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 53 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artofwar |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 16:51 | 7,330 | no change |
| 10 Nov 2026, 15:46 | 7,330 | -33 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 09:00 | 7,363 | +5 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 04:07 | 7,358 | +174 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:40 | 7,184 | no change |
| 4 Nov 2026, 09:37 | 7,184 | -26 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:16 | 7,210 | -6 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:30 | 7,216 | -28 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:36 | 7,244 | -12 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 22:40 | 7,256 | -27 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 22:31 | 7,283 | -16 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 19:01 | 7,299 | -27 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:16 | 7,326 | -30 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 13:10 | 7,356 | -13 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 13:28 | 7,369 | -44 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 7,413 | -16 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 00:16 | 7,429 | -34 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:06 | 7,463 | +11 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 13:57 | 7,452 | -44 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 06:18 | 7,496 | first reading |
50 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 22 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 50 (20 July 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 25,949 |
| Reactions total | 295 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 08:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
833 reactions across 47 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 307 | 36.9% | |
| 👍 | 231 | 27.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 125 | 15.0% | |
| 💯 | 107 | 12.8% | |
| 🐳 | 27 | 3.24% | |
| 🗿 | 15 | 1.80% | |
| 😁 | 15 | 1.80% | |
| 🍾 | 6 | 0.72% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 50 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 833 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (39.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥5
I ask C-levels of the biggest Web3 companies: “What’s the fastest way to get a job in crypto and start making $5,000+ USDT a month plus a percentage?” They all say the same thing: network. Then I ask where to find that network. The answer is always the same: Blockchain Life. So here it is 👇 👉 Dec 1–2, Festival Arena, Dubai 👉 15,000+ attendees, 68% of them founders and C-level. These are the people who hire, and t…
🔥3💯2
1win CMO (@cryptocmo1win) came to our AMA in Art of War. Here's what stuck with me. He runs crypto marketing for a brand that's been buying traffic since 2016 and just closed a token sale for 60M$+. 🟡 Most crypto brands can't measure anything • He sees crypto casinos in Telegram running ads with a plain channel link. No tags. • So they have no idea which placement made money. • Every link needs a tag. Offline gets…
🔥6🐳2❤🔥1
🎁️️️️️️ AMA winners are: @Rashy013 @avratte @Neltzysister @revlyyy28 @alexandrcheb
🐳4🔥3👍1😁1
Today is an AMA with the biggest project I have personally ever worked on in iGaming - 1Win. The CMO of a brand with over $1B in crypto deposits per year. They raised over $60M in 7 days for their token. Don't forget to register on the website to win a deposit: [LINK] Leave your questions here 👇️️️️️️ (short, easy, interesting)
❤🔥19🐳6💯5🔥4🗿2
Once every two weeks, I go through 3,000 requests that come to me for crypto marketing, and it’s so funny: • 60% of the projects are dead. • 30% of the marketers who came to me have been fired. • And only 10% got the chance to get the best service from ICODA. So... think about it. 😁️️️️️️ PS. Now I’m the CMO for all my clients, so I’ll make sure that the strategy is right, that you as a client are 100% satisfied, …
Bro, Kim Jong Un is the best marketer in the world. Not only did he get a $3B ROI with 0$ ad spending (dream of every crypto startup), but the whole world loves him now.
😁10
1wintoken.com just closed 61,000,000$ raise 🤯 Next week (05.11) 3PM CET we’ll find out exactly how.
❤🔥4💯4😁1
Don’t be needy. Be a giver.
💯4
Voice message, posted without a caption
🔥5
By the way, I’m withdrawing everything from Binance ❔ to walllet.com It’s built by my friends and clients, and honestly, from what I see, it’s the best option right now for people who work in Web3 and crypto. Why 👇 • No seed phrase to store • No need to hold TRX, ETH etc. just to pay gas • Best UI/UX I’ve used in a wallet • A team that really cares about its users • Withdraw straight to fiat • Invest in stocks and …
💯4🔥4🍾2
Video message, posted without a caption
😁3🗿2
Showing the 12 most recent of 50 posts we hold for @artofwar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@artofwar edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 4 posts on @artofwar as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
What matters most to you in a Web3 project? 🤔
The shares total 156%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 50 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Art of War | Web3 Marketing” (@artofwar), 7,330 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artofwar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.