Channel
@artifical_intelligent
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001351917837 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @artifical_intelligent |
| Description | все настоящие исчезли в 1917-ом |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artifical_intelligent |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:02 | 2 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:27 | 2 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 July 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2022 to 30 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Научный метод — гарантия истины? А что, если он может доказать даже чушь? Разбираем, как сдвигаются границы доказательности, почему статистика может сыграть злую шутку и как это всё связано с кризисом воспроизводимости. А заодно поговорим об "аргументе доказывающем слишком многое", софистах и их роли в научном прогрессе.
Молитва против бездействия
Кто наш главный герой? Ослябя? Князь Пожарский? Суворов? Жуков? «Петр Первый. Нам всем сегодня страшно не хватает Петра Первого, который, поработав стажером в Apple, вернется домой рубить серпы и молоты у депутатов» — «Быть русским: 15 ответов Панюшкину», Спутник и Погром, 2014г.
Преподобный Марк Подвижник: «Человек говорит ближнему соответственно своему знанию, Бог же действует в слышащем, насколько тот верует.»
Кто бы ни был прав, похоже на правду. Разрушая религию, наука уничтожает фундамент в душах людей. Покойный Константин Крылов удивлялся, что атеисты так легко подтрунивают и даже злорадствуют над верующими - ведь отсутствие Бога - "худшая новость из всех возможных <...> значит, Вселенная бессмысленна, благо иллюзорно, смерть неизбежна и тоже бессмысленна, будущей жизни нет, вселенской справедливости – нет и не будет…
лонгслив засчитан
Если квалиа производятся вычислениями, могу ли я выполнить новое вычисление в своем уме и испытать новое квале?
Привыкают ли исповедующие священники к грехам?
Завтра?
Как прожить жизнь без грехов, хотя бы без серьёзных?
👍1
Комары нарушают NAP
«В 1905 повесили бомбиста Ивана Каляева, в 1923 году почтенную Захарьевскую улицу в Петрограде назвали в его честь, а еще через 60 лет я поселился по соседству. И теперь думаю: а ведь чьим-нибудь внукам предстоит жить на улице Дарьи Треповой, и председатель жилтоварищества будет следить, чтобы у доски с ее именем в апреле трепетали свежие гиацинты». - пишет главред "Радио Свобода". Смешно, что глава издания, боровше…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @artifical_intelligent. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“искусственный интеллигент” (@artifical_intelligent), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artifical_intelligent.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.