Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Infecto-artículos 🦠🧫💊

Channel

Infecto-artículos 🦠🧫💊

@articulosID

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,376subscribers

+44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001969990479
TypeChannel
Username@articulosID
DescriptionArtículos sobre microbiología e infectología relevantes para el día a día 🧫🦠💊
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/articulosID

Growth

11,33211,37611,3547 August 2026 — 11,332 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,332 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,333 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,339 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,340 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,342 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,343 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,348 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,352 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,358 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,366 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,367 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,370 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,372 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,376 subscribers7 August 202621 August 2026
15 measurements spanning 14 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,325–11,383 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 09:5411,376+4
20 Aug 2026, 13:0211,372+2
19 Aug 2026, 09:5211,370+3
18 Aug 2026, 09:2211,367+1
17 Aug 2026, 12:2311,366+8
16 Aug 2026, 02:3811,358+6
14 Aug 2026, 15:4511,352+4
13 Aug 2026, 04:5811,348+5
12 Aug 2026, 02:4211,343+1
10 Aug 2026, 23:2711,342+2
10 Aug 2026, 01:4211,340+1
8 Aug 2026, 23:0011,339+6
7 Aug 2026, 23:5111,333+1
7 Aug 2026, 18:1611,332no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:0911,332first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
59
Links
19

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

191 reactions across 16 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 81.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15681.7%
👍157.85%
🔥105.24%
👏42.09%
🤝21.05%
🤣21.05%
🤷‍♀21.05%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 191reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 January 2026 to 4 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 May 2026, 16:36 UTC≈4,580 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👍21

Signed Shaul Navarro

4 May 2026, 16:34 UTC≈4,680 views30 reactionsread 22 August 2026
File

También: Revisión de hepatitis B de JAMA, recién salida hoy en el StarWarsDay 🤓

26👍2👏2

Signed Shaul Navarro

4 May 2026, 15:12 UTC≈4,640 views18 reactionsread 22 August 2026
File

¿Qué opciones tenemos en el arsenal para combatir infecciones por bacterias resitentes a carbapenémicos? Infectious Disease Clinics nunca falla. Por eso es mi favorita en revisiones de infectología.

15🔥2👍1

Signed Shaul Navarro

24 Mar 2026, 16:00 UTC≈6,470 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

1

Signed Shaul Navarro

24 Mar 2026, 15:59 UTC≈6,040 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Muchas recomendaciones se hicieron con base a estudios observacionales, siendo que hay mejor evidencia para esas poblaciones 😳

4🤝2

Signed Shaul Navarro

24 Mar 2026, 15:59 UTC≈5,880 views15 reactionsread 22 August 2026

No todo es blanco o negro. Me llamó mucho la atención que: 1. Siguen recomendando 30 ml/kg para reanimación 2. Sugieren antibiótico pre-hospitalario cuando el traslado a hospital sea > 1 hora

13🤷‍♀2

Signed Shaul Navarro

24 Mar 2026, 15:52 UTC≈5,550 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @Critical_Care1File

File, posted without a caption

1

Signed Shaul Navarro

24 Mar 2026, 15:51 UTC≈5,250 views3 reactionsread 22 August 2026
File

Ayer se publicaron las actualizaciones de Surviving Sepsis 2026! (Previas de 2021). A revisarla con calma 😌

🔥3

Signed Shaul Navarro

1 Mar 2026, 20:02 UTC≈6,140 viewsread 22 August 2026

Aclaratorio: sepsis ≠ choque séptico

Signed Shaul Navarro

1 Mar 2026, 19:54 UTC≈6,140 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

4🤣2🔥1

Signed Shaul Navarro

1 Mar 2026, 19:54 UTC≈5,470 views9 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Incluso hasta 3 horas pudiera extenderse la ventana para el inicio de antibiótico. Tiempo suficiente para investigar el foco de origen, pensar en el mejor esquema empírico y buscar estudios que confirmen el diagnóstico microbiológico para dar terapia dirigida en los siguientes días

9

Signed Shaul Navarro

1 Mar 2026, 19:52 UTC≈5,030 views20 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Muy denso, pero me gustó este cuadro. Hay escenarios donde no es urgencia iniciar el antibiótico. El paradigma de la hora dorada en sepsis no debería ser una regla general, sino una decisión balanceando los riesgos/beneficios.

20

Signed Shaul Navarro

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @articulosID. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Medinternafacil 🤓🩺
@medinternafacil · 61,823
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 22 August 2026
Artículos Médicos - Luis, el intensivista
@luiselintensivista · 72,952
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
Clinical Practice guidelines
@ClinicalPharmGuideline · 59,739
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Infecto-artículos 🦠🧫💊” (@articulosID), 11,376 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/articulosID.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.