Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Артём Первушин

Channel

Артём Первушин

@artempervushin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,388subscribers

-47 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001200723388
TypeChannel
Username@artempervushin
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/artempervushin

Growth

18,38818,43518,411.56 August 2026 — 18,435 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,435 subscribers6 August 2026 — 18,433 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,432 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,425 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,424 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,420 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,414 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,413 subscribers13 August 2026 — 18,409 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,399 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,393 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,388 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
13 measurements spanning 12 days, net -47. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,381–18,442 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:0318,388-5
16 Aug 2026, 15:2418,393-6
14 Aug 2026, 21:5718,399-10
13 Aug 2026, 11:4818,409-4
12 Aug 2026, 10:2618,413-1
11 Aug 2026, 13:0818,414-6
10 Aug 2026, 12:0218,420-4
9 Aug 2026, 09:1318,424-1
8 Aug 2026, 10:5718,425-7
7 Aug 2026, 08:2518,432-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:5118,433-2
6 Aug 2026, 06:0018,435no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:5518,435first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
17.0%
avg views ÷ 18,388 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,130
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.815%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held16 (22 June 20263 August 2026)
Views total12,520
Reactions total102
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 16:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23m 46s
Average length
23m 46s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

491 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
18136.9%
👍12525.5%
🔥10421.2%
custom 5303472165956367812306.11%
🥰173.46%
👏163.26%
🤯163.26%
😱20.407%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 491reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 16 we hold a reading for · 94%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @artempervushin. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 07:41 UTC≈2,570 views39 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

Кстати, про сам рынок. Пару недель назад у меня был рекордный убыток, а в комментариях мне уверенно объясняли, что российский рынок – это дно и надо всё продавать. Рынок отскочил, и сейчас у меня снова прибыль 235.500 ₽. Дно, как это обычно и бывает, оказалось точкой входа. Кто бы мог подумать? 🧐

23👍7🔥6👏3

3 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC≈2,610 views10 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Photo

Обновил бота для учёта финансов. Раньше в нём можно было вести только расходы и доходы. Теперь появились долги – кто занимал у вас и кому должны вы, с суммами и остатками. Добавил раздел фондового рынка: сделки, дивиденды, купоны и операции по брокерскому счёту. Открываете раздел и сразу видите размер счёта, сколько вложено, структуру портфеля по секторам и поток в месяц. На скриншоте – мой портфель, как он выглядит

🔥82

24 Jul 2026, 08:04 UTC≈3,850 views15 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Photo

Есть одно "но": регулярные покупки говноактивов не превращают их в хорошие инвестиции. Особенно на российском рынке, где хватает проблемных компаний, способных годами уничтожать капитал. Если выбирать между покупкой таких активов и отсутствием покупок, лучше не покупать ничего. Что тогда покупать? Есть два варианта. Первый – разобраться самостоятельно. На сайте Fundstate в разделе «Отчётность компаний» уже собрана

custom 5303472165956367812112👍1🔥1

24 Jul 2026, 07:14 UTC≈3,490 views38 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Photo

Вот очередной пример, почему акции нужно покупать регулярно, а не ждать "лучшей точки входа". На росте покупать не хочется – "дорого". На падении начинается паника – "акции будут стоить ноль" (или чего там все боятся?) В итоге и "на дне" купить не успеете, и в ожидании следующего дна останетесь без позиции. Дальше FOMO и покупки на хаях. Затем коррекция, паника, "я же ждал дно, сейчас и пойдёт" – продажа в минус. И

18👍9custom 53034721659563678129🤯2

18 Jul 2026, 06:16 UTC≈4,650 views54 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Photo

На днях пришли дивиденды. Этот скрин хорошо показывает, ради чего я держу портфель: слева – суммарный P&L с бумажной переоценкой и текущей просадкой по активам, справа – дивидендный P&L, то есть фактически полученные деньги. Я инвестирую именно ради правого графика – ради денежного потока, а не ради ежедневной переоценки портфеля. Активы не продаю, потому что моя задача – получать выплаты и держать систему, а не пыт

30🔥10👍6custom 53034721659563678125👏2🤯1

13 Jul 2026, 18:43 UTC≈5,050 views31 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥20🤯73👍1

13 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC≈4,580 views35 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

Во всех книгах пишут: когда на рынке льётся кровь, страх зашкаливает, а акции вызывают только раздражение — исторически именно такие периоды часто становились лучшим временем для покупок 📉 Я много раз читал об этом, но настолько сильную панику вживую наблюдаю впервые. Сейчас я вижу тот самый момент, о котором обычно рассказывают уже после восстановления рынка, когда покупать на низких уровнях кажется очевидным. Поэ

👍1810🔥3🥰2custom 53034721659563678122

13 Jul 2026, 18:42 UTC≈3,520 views23 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Photo

Рынок акций РФ сильно просел. Впервые вижу в комментариях столько злости: «Российский рынок — это дно», «Артём сам — дно», «сюда нельзя инвестировать», «нужно всё продавать». Обычно такие комментарии оставляли криптотрейдеры, потерявшие все деньги. Но чтобы до такого состояния дошли обычные инвесторы — такого я ещё не видел.

🥰10🔥7custom 530347216595636781232😱1

6 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC≈4,490 views31 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026

Сегодня купил немного акций. В видео объяснил, почему сейчас не захожу на весь свободный кэш, хотя по моей стратегии в идеале портфель должен быть полностью в акциях, без доли наличных. Также рассказал, почему я не рассматриваю облигации, почему для себя считаю акции более интересным вариантом, зачем вообще продолжаю инвестировать в российский фондовый рынок в текущей ситуации и какие у меня сейчас результаты. Инт

23👍8

6 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC≈4,050 views13 reactions1 Starread 17 August 2026
Video

Акции на дне: почему я покупаю, когда рынок падает Полезные ссылки: Веди учёт портфеля на Fundstate – https://fundstate.ru/app/finance/capital/stocks Акции в подарок за открытие счета: 💸 Регистрация у ТОП-1 брокера РФ – https://f-s.cc/s/bcs ❗️ Инвестируй БЕЗ КОМИССИЙ с БКС – https://f-s.cc/s/bcs Если у вас возникла проблема при загрузке брокерского отчета к нам на сайт для учета портфеля - напишите мне в телеграме

8👏5

28 Jun 2026, 19:11 UTC≈5,440 views41 reactions2 Starsread 17 August 2026

Я наконец-то сделал Telegram-бота для учета расходов внутри Fundstate 😳 И это не просто “ботик, куда можно что-то записать”. За ним уже стоит полноценное веб-приложение для учета финансов. Если раньше Fundstate был в первую очередь онлайн-школой, где можно смотреть курсы, то сейчас я постепенно превращаю его в полноценную систему для личных финансов: • расходы • доходы • капитал • инвестиционный портфель • дивиде

👍23🔥117

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @artempervushin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 140,041 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Артём Первушин” (@artempervushin), 18,388 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artempervushin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.