#BTC / USD HVN area of 65-72,000 hold up well. We just broke $80,000 and heading towards $84-87,000 levels. Next huge area of resistance at wide HVN area with key level at $94,200-ish (0.618 Fib). Pretty cool huh
π₯2π1

Channel
@artemfuturestrading
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
2,085subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 1,000β3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001213771765 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @artemfuturestrading |
| Created | 25 December 2017 β measured β cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artemfuturestrading |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 2,085 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 2,087 | -5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 2,092 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:52 | 2,092 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 31 July 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
77 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 25 | 32.5% | |
| π₯ | 24 | 31.2% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 12 | 15.6% | |
| π | 10 | 13.0% | |
| β‘ | 3 | 3.90% | |
| π³ | 3 | 3.90% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 77reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2025 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @artemfuturestrading. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2025 to 5 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
#BTC / USD HVN area of 65-72,000 hold up well. We just broke $80,000 and heading towards $84-87,000 levels. Next huge area of resistance at wide HVN area with key level at $94,200-ish (0.618 Fib). Pretty cool huh
π₯2π1
πΈ Hey everyone, hope you are doing good during this crazy week in markets! I've just pulled an update on this idea. Go check it out, there might be a few things, which may help you down the road this year!
π5π³3
π’ Quick Bitcoin Price Update β December 23, 2025 π Hey fam, it's been long time! #BTC is hovering around $88,000 right now, still trapped in that stubborn downtrend channel. Price action: Sideways grind between $85K-$94K after bouncing from $80K psychological level. Key watch: If order flow pushes us below $85K, expect potential liquidation cascade β test $75K-78K LVN, or deeper to $60K-70K HVN (passive spot buyeβ¦
π₯9β‘2
#BTC Bro, are you for real?!
π10π₯5β€βπ₯4
#BTC overshoot my target π― and now a new all-time high doesnβt feel too far off! Still, gotta stay sharp β letβs see if it breaks out or pulls back and sets up a range around $123,000.
#BTC seems to clear $116,000 resistance level and now rejected at $117,800 couple times, if there is not enough buyers it will likely to get back to $115,000. Otherwise it might juice up to $120,000
π₯3π1
π₯
π5β€βπ₯1
Bitcoin 4h Chart Update [Tight Range / Breakout Opportunities]
π¨βοΈ
β‘1
Some shitposting for fun https://www.tradingview.com/chart/BTCUSD/ODmhfj6Z-Bitcoin-Smiling-Again/
Let's see if we can manage to rebound from the $112,000. Stock market melted today on tariff uncertainty. Could be hard to lift up.
π3
Alright, been a while, but here's the deal: still no altseason in sight. Meanwhile, #ETH / USDT dropping some serious hints of a wild bull run on this fractal chart. It s got that 2020 vibe, though the timing s a tad off especially when you factor in Bitcoin s cycles. Gonna be a blast watching this play out! https://www.tradingview.com/chart/ETHUSDT/LRFka1DG-Haven-t-Posted-in-a-Bit-Here-s-a-Solid-Chart-for-You-Allβ¦
β€βπ₯3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @artemfuturestrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank β 334,372 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βππ₯π§ππ ππ₯π¬π£π§π’ | ARSHEVELEVβ (@artemfuturestrading), 2,085 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artemfuturestrading.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.