Channel
@artemcryptoblog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
779subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001423797003 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @artemcryptoblog |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/artemcryptoblog |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 20:03 | 779 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 00:25 | 781 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:00 | 782 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:50 | 782 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 28 April 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
🥰 Друзья сейчас отлучаюсь по важному вызову от команды 😤, вечером приеду и покажу вам отзыв победителя на 100.000₽ С победителем на 150.000₽ пока небольшие проблемы, надеюсь решим их и выложу отзыв 😘
‼️ 1846 (ID) - выиграл главный приз 150.000₽ ‼️
ARTEM 💸 pinned «Что такое антифрод и с чем его едят❓ Последнее время я получаю очень много вопросов от подписчиков и участников розыгрыша, с чем связано появление у меня такой системы, а некоторые даже умудряются найти здесь какой-то подвох... Давайте разберёмся❗️ Антифрóд…»
Что такое антифрод и с чем его едят❓ Последнее время я получаю очень много вопросов от подписчиков и участников розыгрыша, с чем связано появление у меня такой системы, а некоторые даже умудряются найти здесь какой-то подвох... Давайте разберёмся❗️ Антифрóд или фрод-мониторинг — система, предназначенная для оценки финансовых и не финансовых событий (карточных транзакций, действий пользователя в ДБО, операций с бал…
☝️ Осталось 5 минут. У всех шансы равны! ☝️
💸 Так как будет разыграно сразу два приза очень крупных - даю возможность всем выполнить условия 👇 ✅ Подписаться на данный канал ✅ Написать «+» в личные сообщения @artemcryptoman @artemcryptoman @artemcryptoman ❗️В 16:00 начнем выбирать победителей. Кто не выполнил условия - у Вас остаётся 10 минут!
🥰 Друзья совсем скоро начну выбирать сразу двух победителей на 100.000₽ и 150.000₽ ❗️Также напоминаю, что все кто не выиграют - получат утешительный приз!
✅ Но впереди ещё остались самые крупные призы на 100.000₽ и 150.000₽! 💰 Просто нужно подписаться на канал и написать «+» в личные сообщения @artemcryptoman @artemcryptoman @artemcryptoman
💸 А вот тот самый победитель который забрал 75.000₽ Андрею эти деньги уж точно пригодятся учитывая его сегодняшнюю ситуацию. Я всегда рад помочь 🤝
Sticker, posted without a caption
❗️Выбираем второго победителя? Дайте ответ сообщением в личные сообщения. И не забываем про подписку на данный канал. @artemcryptoman @artemcryptoman @artemcryptoman
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @artemcryptoblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,231,554 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@artemcryptoblog named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ARTEM 💸” (@artemcryptoblog), 779 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artemcryptoblog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.