Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for аня голубь • записки арт-директора

Channel

аня голубь • записки арт-директора

@artdirectornotes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

222subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001354182699
TypeChannel
Username@artdirectornotes
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/artdirectornotes

Growth

22222822511 August 2026 — 228 subscribers11 August 2026 — 228 subscribers19 August 2026 — 222 subscribers11 August 202619 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 221–229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 11:16222-6
11 Aug 2026, 22:13228no change
11 Aug 2026, 16:31228first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 9 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.6%
avg views ÷ 222 subscribers
Avg views / post
48.0
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held11 (9 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total336
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 16:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

82 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4150.0%
custom 52918394403086988991720.7%
custom 529181268695741463889.76%
custom 529179056358087093056.10%
👍44.88%
❤‍🔥33.66%
💯33.66%
custom 529225939362096837211.22%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 82reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 03:28 UTC41 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

А теперь то, что мне интереснее всего: расскажите в комментариях, что у вас сейчас за период? Что занимает голову — работа, дети, переезд, поиск себя, что угодно. Например, в моей жизни сейчас период переосмысления карьерного пути, новая школа у старшего сына, +1 зуб у младшего, поиск дома побольше, интереснейшая книга в прочтении, налаживание рутины после 1 месяца каникул в России, детская книга в процессе создани

1

10 Aug 2026, 03:19 UTC41 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Почему вы тут? 🅰️

  1. Читаю про дизайн и брендинг (кейсы, тренды) 👁‍🗨33%
  2. Хочу стать дизайнером 🧌0%
  3. Читаю про то, как устроена жизнь и работа 🪑27%
  4. Мы знакомы 🌸53%
  5. Я родитель с творческой профессией 💥27%
  6. Не знаю 🧿7%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

2

10 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTC35 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Мам пап, перекличка ⭐️

  1. Есть дети54%
  2. Нету детей15%
  3. Хочу детей23%
  4. Не хочу детей15%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTC35 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Чем вы занимаетесь?

  1. Работаю в дизайне, креативе ⚱️64%
  2. Учусь или только вхожу в дизайн 👢0%
  3. Свое дело, предпринимательство 🏠29%
  4. Другая сфера, к дизайну отношения не имею 🫶21%
  5. Сейчас не работаю 🔨0%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 03:11 UTC36 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет 🌼 этот канал веду давно, но последнее время очень торможу с постами сюда, потому что чувствую, что здесь собрались люди на тему брендинга и дизайна. А я сейчас хочу писать шире и глубже, касаясь больше темы целой жизни. И сказать есть много что. Меняю то, о чём здесь пишу, и поняла, что почти ничего про вас не знаю. Мне правда интересно узнать кто здесь и почему подписан 🎴 ответьте, пожалуйста

3❤‍🔥1custom 52922593936209683721

30 Jul 2026, 14:04 UTC65 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

wellness находки недели 🌱 01 Интервью с моим любимым доктором, наблюдаюсь у Елены Александровны с 2022 года и жизнь с того момента поменялась сильно в лучшую сторону 02 Рецепт салата Дженифер Энистон, буду пробовать, салат это база любого дня 🫶 В каждый прием пищи обязательно добавляю много листовой зелени и овощей 03 про уверенность — очень вовремя попался. Как раз пошла в работу с психологом с темой «уверенность

3💯2👍1

28 Jul 2026, 01:25 UTC83 views12 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Когда я была маленькой и видела овощи или фрукты с изъянами — неровной формы, с пупырками, сросшиеся и тд — я их оценивала как некрасивые, неправильные, неидеальные в конце концов. Потому что по телевизору и в журналах, в мультфильмах и рекламе я видела идеальной формы и цвета помидоры, персики и прочие плоды. Это формировало отношение к внешнему виду, к эстетике, к так называемой норме. Получалось, что все, что не

8custom 52918126869574146383💯1

20 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC104 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня посмотрели семьей кино — Невероятное приключение мистера Спивета (от режиссера «Амели»). Про мальчика-гения 10 лет, который отправился в путешествие через всю Америку. Очень глубокая история, в которой сочетается смех, грусть, драма, наивность, приключение, взрослое, детское. Мне вообще очень очень близки истории и манеры рассказывать , когда все динамично. Когда показывают жизнь с разных сторон и ракурсов.

custom 529181268695741463821👍1

19 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC96 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Вот уже как 3 месяца я пишу детскую книгу — первое настоящее авторское творчество. Было сделано много для клиентов, были попытки рисовать, придумывать. Но вот так, чтобы я создала что-то большое и назвала творческим личным проектом - впервые. Так как это первый опыт, то процесс занимает гораздо больше времени (наверное). Первая рукопись была вроде бы ок, я ее разослала подругам и друзьям для первых отзывов, но внут

5custom 52918126869574146383custom 52918394403086988991

10 Jul 2026, 07:11 UTC831 views24 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Creative Parenthood х Вика Шешура 🌺 Новый герой рубрики Творческого родительства — Вика Шешура, веб и графический дизайнер с опытом 5+ лет, развивает онлайн-школу для дизайнеров, автор курса «Нейротайник» по практической работе с Ai в дизайне и мама прекрасного сына Леона. Вика живет с семьей дома в деревне и много путешествует, например когда сыну было 5 месяцев, они были на настоящей свадьбе в Индии 👁 Подписать

13custom 52918394403086988996custom 52917905635808709305

9 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC126 views19 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

1 из 10 в стол. Что происходит, когда ты создаёшь бренд мечты — а он остаётся жить только на Behance? Do I Do. Женский бренд одежды с большой размерной линейкой и главной идеей: норма — одна, и это твоя норма. Мы сделали для него всё. Не «упаковку», а целую вселенную: платформу бренда, айдентику, tone of voice, метафору (привет, Ева и яблоко 🍏),арт дирекшн, упаковку и даже первые концепции для фотосъемки. Проект

custom 5291839440308698899105❤‍🔥2👍2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @artdirectornotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 03:19 UTCAnonymous Poll15 voters

Почему вы тут? 🅰️

  1. Читаю про дизайн и брендинг (кейсы, тренды) 👁‍🗨33%
  2. Хочу стать дизайнером 🧌0%
  3. Читаю про то, как устроена жизнь и работа 🪑27%
  4. Мы знакомы 🌸53%
  5. Я родитель с творческой профессией 💥27%
  6. Не знаю 🧿7%

The shares total 147%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 03:14 UTCAnonymous Poll13 voters

Мам пап, перекличка ⭐️

  1. Есть дети54%
  2. Нету детей15%
  3. Хочу детей23%
  4. Не хочу детей15%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

10 Aug 2026, 03:13 UTCAnonymous Poll14 voters

Чем вы занимаетесь?

  1. Работаю в дизайне, креативе ⚱️64%
  2. Учусь или только вхожу в дизайн 👢0%
  3. Свое дело, предпринимательство 🏠29%
  4. Другая сфера, к дизайну отношения не имею 🫶21%
  5. Сейчас не работаю 🔨0%

The shares total 114%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 696,403 of 1,563,849entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“аня голубь • записки арт-директора” (@artdirectornotes), 222 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/artdirectornotes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.