Channel
@art_quo
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,925subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002568149790 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @art_quo |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/art_quo |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:24 | 1,925 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:48 | 1,930 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 1,931 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 1,931 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (24 July 2026 – 28 July 2026) |
| Views total | 6,461 |
| Reactions total | 136 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:32 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
136 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 89 | 65.4% | |
| 🔥 | 19 | 14.0% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 6.62% | |
| 💋 | 8 | 5.88% | |
| 🕊 | 7 | 5.15% | |
| 🏆 | 3 | 2.21% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.735% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
М. Ю. Лермонтов Из романа «Герой нашего времени»: «Тот, кому случалось, как мне, бродить по горам пустынным, и долго-долго всматриваться в их причудливые образы, и жадно глотать животворящий воздух, разлитый в их ущельях, тот, конечно, поймёт моё желание передать, рассказать, нарисовать эти волшебные картины» Картина его же, "Крестовая гора"
❤17🔥7🏆3
А вот причём: Лермонтов в 1840 году решил перевести это стихотворение Гёте - вы его, конечно, знаете из школьного курса "Горные вершины Спят во тьме ночной; Тихие долины Полны свежей мглой; Не пылит дорога, Не дрожат листы… Подожди немного, Отдохнёшь и ты." А 21.07.1994 Егор Летов взял строй и последние строчки этого стихотворения и переосмыслил его в реалиях того неспокойного времени, написав песню "Дембельская"…
❤5👍3
Говоря о необычных путях, которыми до нас доходят отголоски искусства седых времен. Вот картина «Wanderer im Mondschein» («Странник при лунном свете») работа немецкого художника Арнольда Форстманна, ок. 1914 Это широко известный и популярный в его время сюжет, несомненно, вдохновленный стихотворением И. Гёте "Ночная песнь странника" - написано оно было 6 сентября 1780 года карандашом на деревянной стене охотни…
❤5
Маттиас Грюневальд (1485-1528), ещё один мастер Северного Возрождения. Как и остальные, создал много произведений на религиозную тему. Если его работа "Воскрешение" (часть Изенгеймского алтаря) кажется вам странно знакомой - вам не кажется. Возможно, вы её видели (и даже слышали) в качестве альбома другого мастера, нашего современника.
❤6🔥4
«Тяжёл творческий путь художника. Но прекрасен тот чудесный огонёк, к которому он стремится и который называется творчеством» Ливий Степанович Щипачёв "Жена приехала", 1958
❤9💋4🔥1
«...знаменитый Ганс Гольбейн, который на удивление всего мира создал себе такое великое и славное имя в нашем искусстве, родился, насколько мне известно, в скалистой и пустынной Швейцарии, в городе Базеле, в 1498 году» И тоже не оставил нам цитат, но был известен своими реалистичными работами
❤5🔥3💋1
«Портрет Дамы» (1462). Рогир ван дер Вейден
❤10🕊3💋2
Иероним Босх, ещё один мастер северного возрождения. Не оставил дневников и высказываний. Дюрер о нём : "Ничего подобного до сих пор не делали и ни о чём подобном не думали" Портрет Босха и его единственная, пожалуй, нормальная картина
❤5💋1🕊1
А. Петелин, «Белое море. Перед закатом» 2023 год. На минуточку, сам художник : https://t.me/petelin_gallery
❤5👍2👎1🕊1
Доброе утро! Цитату сами придумайте 😁
❤14🔥4🕊1
Самая опасная охота на диких зверей является лишь забавой детей старого возраста. Единственно опасным для всех зверем, на которого нет охоты и выходят на которого лишь поневоле,– это зверь, обитающий в человеке. Множество людей, сами того не зная, живут только страхом этого зверя, ненависти к нему, презрения, но еще большее множество при каждом удобном случае сами обращаются в такого же зверя. Конечно, есть и настоящ…
❤8👍4🕊1
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @art_quo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 883,524 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дневник художника” (@art_quo), 1,925 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/art_quo.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.