6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,691–1,694 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 20:24
1,692
-1
15 Aug 2026, 00:38
1,693
-1
11 Aug 2026, 08:07
1,694
+2
8 Aug 2026, 15:28
1,692
+1
7 Aug 2026, 21:03
1,691
no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:46
1,691
first reading
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 24 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.9%
avg views ÷ 1,692 subscribers
Avg views / post
184
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
13 (24 June 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
1,473
Reactions total
83
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 21:03 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 17s
Average length
46s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
147 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
106
72.1%
👍
31
21.1%
💯
4
2.72%
😍
4
2.72%
💋
2
1.36%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 24 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 13 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @art_istoria. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Почему Маргарита стала ведьмой? В 3 видео курса по книге Мастер и Маргарита мы поговорим про путь ведьмы через алхимию души. В этом видео я хочу показать альтернативное мнение, что Маргарита стала ведьмой не из-за любви, а для личного развития.
▶️ Смотреть: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VB8CyOumQT4&list=PLOfLPtFGmyug9-G-qJCpA6Mo05YM9CeKs&index=3
___
🇮🇹 Итальянский язык с Влад Кава
✍️ Влад, блог об искусстве и отно…
Вечная любовь «Amor aeternus».
«Любящая любовь своего Бога, изображенная на эмблемах Германа Гюго», ок. 1717 г., работа Жанны-Марии Гийон.
Гравюра, эмблема вечной любви. В центре две крылатые фигуры стоят внутри круга, образованного Уроборосом — змеей, кусающей свой хвост, — лежащей на земле. Фигура слева представляет Божественную Любовь, и ее голову окружает сияющий нимб света. В правой руке она держит лук, а левой …
Декадрахма — одна из самых дорогих и редких монет в мире. Она выпускалась только по случаю значимых событий, например военной победы.
Денежная единица была достоинством в 10 драхм и весом порядка 43 грамм. Возможно, именно поэтому декадрахма больше похожа на медаль, а не монету. Она чеканилась в Афинах, Акраганте и при правлении Александра Македонского. Сохранилось только небольшое количество монет.
На этой фотографи…
💎 Пока готовлю ооочень длинную лекцию с комментариями к каждой из 102 иллюстрации Уильяма Блейка к курсу «Божественной комедии» Данте, можете под кофе смотреть быстрый 10 минутный обзор 102 иллюстраций)
💕 Кстати, Уильям Блейк в 67 лет начал учить итальянский язык, чтобы точно создать эти иллюстрации к Данте...
▶️ Смотреть видео: https://youtu.be/n5VWd5HG0jA
___
🇮🇹 Итальянский язык с Влад Кава
✍️ Влад, блог об иску…
Данте и Беатриче среди звезд. Фрагмент венецианского издания «Божественной комедии» Данте XVI века, иллюстрирующий XXII песнь «Рая».
Новая лекция по Данте: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lW7B2Dq0mbM
Первая лекция курса Данте уже на канале. Как Данте Алигьери создал Ад?
🌹 В этой лекции мы разберем психологию Ада Данте Алигьери и узнаем, как Божественная комедия помогает пережить экзистенциальный кризис.
🎁 Поймём почему Ад - это не огонь, а лед внутри нас. Мы глубоко погрузимся в смыслы «Божественной комедии» Данте Алигьери через призму современной психологии и философии.
🎁 Вы поймёте почему Ад Данте – это не рел…
Пока готовлю 1 лекцию курса медленного чтения Данте, буду делится арт-находками
Иллюстрация к «Божественной комедии» Данте из «Латинского кодекса урбанистического мира 365» (1480 г.), изображающая замерзший центр Земли с Люцифером, заточенным во льду. Данте представлял эту часть ада как замерзшую пустыню, поскольку она находилась как можно дальше от теплого солнца в его геоцентрической вселенной (Земля как центр косм…
Вот как Чезаре Рипа визуализировал концепцию Вечности в 1603 году.
После своего выхода в 1593 году «Иконология» Чезаре Рипы стала одним из главных справочников по аллегорическим образам в раннемодерной Европе, особенно с появлением иллюстрированного издания 1603 года. В этой традиции концепция вечности также воплотилась в жизнь через образ Вечности (Eternità).
На изображении представлена аллегория Eternità — или Вечн…
🎓 Новое видео на канале: Почему Пиноккио стал человеком, а Буратино остался куклой?
🔑 Многие считают, что «Золотой ключик» - это просто пересказ итальянской сказки, но на самом деле это две противоположные философии. Мы разберём смысл сказки Пиноккио как историю о духовной эволюции, алхимии души и трудном пути очеловечивания. И сравним её с «Золотым ключиком», который представляет собой социальный манифест и гимн вн…
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @art_istoria. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ИСТОРИЯ ИСКУССТВ и редкие арт находки” (@art_istoria), 1,692 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/art_istoria.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
