@. Archives / الشهادات...🐫 pinned «𓏸.. 🦋🤍 عَرَبِيَّة ⤸ desert elegance page o𝑓 @Embwun 𓂃 。دَلِيلُ الخَرِيطَة ✩ ۔ بِسْمِ اللهِ | 𝗚𝗨𝗜𝗗𝗘 𝗠𝗔𝗣𝗦 𖦹°‧ ♡ 💄 follow this guide to explore every section with ease. Each destination is carefully arranged to help you find everything you need. شُكْرًا…»

Channel
@. Archives / الشهادات...🐫
@arsiphasil
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003914075796 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arsiphasil |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arsiphasil |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:56 | 1 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 1 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 5821.4%
- avg views ÷ 1 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 58.2
- 14 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 16
- of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (2 August 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 815 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
𓏸.. 🦋🤍 عَرَبِيَّة ⤸ desert elegance page o𝑓 @Embwun 𓂃 。دَلِيلُ الخَرِيطَة ✩ ۔ بِسْمِ اللهِ | 𝗚𝗨𝗜𝗗𝗘 𝗠𝗔𝗣𝗦 𖦹°‧ ♡ 💄 follow this guide to explore every section with ease. Each destination is carefully arranged to help you find everything you need. شُكْرًا and enjoy your journey. 🍒 ❌💀 𝗢𝗪𝗡𝗘𝗥 ❌💀 𝗧𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗜 ❌💀 𝗥𝗡𝗞 ❌💀 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗨𝗟𝗧
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel photo updated
Sticker, posted without a caption
𓏸.. 🐈⬛ عَرَبِيَّة ⤸ desert elegance page o𝑓 @Embwun 。شَهَادَاتُ العَمِيلَات ✩ ۔ الحمدُ لله | 𝗥𝗡𝗞 𖦹°‧ ♡ 💄 every review is a reflection of your trust and support. شُكْرًا جَزِيلًا for choosing us and being part of our journey. 👜 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝘀𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗯𝗲 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗽𝗳𝘂𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝘄𝗮𝘀! 𝗿𝗲𝘀𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀-𝗳𝗿𝗲𝗲. 𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗶𝗹𝘆 𝗺𝘆 𝗳𝗮𝘃𝗼𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗮𝘀𝗸𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘄. 𝗮𝗯𝘀𝗼𝗹𝘂𝘁𝗲 𝘁…
Photo, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
𓏸.. 🌟 عَرَبِيَّة ⤸ desert elegance page o𝑓 @Embwun 𓂃 。شَهَادَاتُ العَمِيلَات ✩ ۔ الحمدُ لله | 𝗧𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗜𝗠𝗢𝗡𝗜 𖦹°‧ ♡ 🎀 every kind word shared here is a precious testimony from our lovely clients. Your trust, satisfaction, and continuous support inspire us to keep delivering the finest quality and heartfelt service. شُكْرًا جَزِيلًا for being a part of our story. ❤️
Photo, posted without a caption
Sticker, posted without a caption
𓏸.. ❤️ عَرَبِيَّة ⤸ desert elegance page o𝑓 @Embwun 。نَتَائِجُ العَمَل ✩ ۔ الحمدُ لله | 𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗨𝗟𝗧 𖦹°‧ ♡ 👌 every result reflects our dedication, precision, and your trust. شُكْرًا for letting us bring your vision to life. May every creation leave a lasting impression. 🍒
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @arsiphasil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 637,134 of 1,550,164entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“@. Archives / الشهادات...🐫” (@arsiphasil), 1 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arsiphasil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.