Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 59% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 91 days, net -943. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,989–15,214 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 15:07
14,130
-9
5 Nov 2026, 15:36
14,139
-5
4 Nov 2026, 19:10
14,144
-19
3 Nov 2026, 16:26
14,163
-10
2 Nov 2026, 15:38
14,173
-3
31 Oct 2026, 20:26
14,176
-7
30 Oct 2026, 19:01
14,183
-16
29 Oct 2026, 19:57
14,199
-13
28 Oct 2026, 22:46
14,212
-12
27 Oct 2026, 19:56
14,224
-14
26 Oct 2026, 22:54
14,238
-14
25 Oct 2026, 21:38
14,252
-2
24 Oct 2026, 18:07
14,254
-11
23 Oct 2026, 20:27
14,265
-7
22 Oct 2026, 21:37
14,272
-6
21 Oct 2026, 19:08
14,278
-10
19 Oct 2026, 15:46
14,288
-8
18 Oct 2026, 13:37
14,296
-7
17 Oct 2026, 15:49
14,303
-13
16 Oct 2026, 15:40
14,316
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 28 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 63 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
1.44%
avg views ÷ 14,130 subscribers
Avg views / post
204
1 post measured
Reaction rate
4.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
7 (28 March 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
204
Reactions total
9
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 18:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
409
Videos
35
Links
125
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
188 reactions across 7 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
53
28.2%
🔥
52
27.7%
👍
38
20.2%
🐳
11
5.85%
❤🔥
9
4.79%
⚡
8
4.26%
😱
6
3.19%
😍
3
1.60%
🆒
2
1.06%
👏
2
1.06%
🙏
2
1.06%
🤩
1
0.532%
🤷♂
1
0.532%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 188 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 1 post held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
✅ Результат До/После
На фото до (снизу-справа) - видим старую композитную реставрацию центрального зуба измененного в цвете. Так же, видим небольшую стираемость режущих краев и соседнего зуба.
ℹ️ Я не устану повторять это на очных консультациях, так и здесь.
Художественная реставрация (пломба) - меняет свои свойства со временем и несет временный характер лечения.
✅ Что после?
Два керамических E-max винира, позволи…
Преображение 🙌
🦷Знаю-знаю, затянул. Ну, а что поделать, работа порой затягивает так, что соцсети уходят на второй план.
ℹ️ Для всех кто забыл о чем речь, весь путь пациента и проделанной работы, описан ваше
Думаю вы не в обиде, я же все таки не блоггер🥲
Давайте просто порадуемся за нашего яркого пациента и просто очень крутого человека 👏👏👏
📱 What’sUp +7(936)138-10-20
➡️Запись на консультацию: ссылка
📱 Задать во…
✅ Результат До/После
Думаю слова тут излишне, но все же постараюсь кратко описать, какую работу мы провели с нашим пациентом.
Как я уже писал выше, пациент после ортодонтии (носил брекеты), на мой скромный взгляд, результат выше всяких похвал. Врач-ортодонт, сделал свою работу с любовью и трепетом.
🦷 Ко мне же пациент обратился за эстетикой и функцией. Думаю мы тоже не ударили в грязь лицом и справились с поставле…
📌Вы готовы к новому преображению?
📆 После двух лет ношения брекет-системы, наш пациент обратился за эстетикой и функцией.
Результат, следующим постом 🔥
📱 What’sUp +7(936)138-10-20
➡️Запись на консультацию: ссылка
📱 Задать вопрос @medzon_msk
➡️Оставить отзыв: ссылка
📌Результат преображения - До/После
Друзья, как и обещал результат большого труда, как моего личного так и нашей прекрасной пациентки🦷♥️
Этот путь мы прошли не без
шероховатостей, но в итоге получили сногсшибательную улыбку!🔥🔥🔥
📱 What’sUp +7(936)138-10-20
➡️Запись на консультацию: ссылка
📱 Задать вопрос @medzon_msk
➡️Оставить отзыв: ссылка
📌 Друзья, я знаю что вы скучали по зубам в вашей ленте, и кто я такой, чтобы вас расстраивать.
Некоторое время потребовалось чтобы организовать 4 соц сети и вести их параллельно. Поэтому, подписывайтесь в ту соц-сеть, которая вам ближе.
Max - ссылка
VK - ссылка
Instagram - ссылка
Telegram - ссылка
А пока вы подписываетесь, расскажу, какая работа была проведена выше ⬆️
☑️ Что было?
▫️Отсутствие жевательной группы
…
📌История длиною в 6 месяцев!
****
🦷 На фото до: треугольник зубов и кариес на всех трех контактах.
🧐Почему так?
Причин может быть несколько, но основной - зуб «мудрости» который сместил весь зубной ряд. Т.к. ему просто не хватало место в челюсти.
🍀Какие пути решения?
1) удалить зуб мудрости, поносить брекеты и восстановить зубной ряд. Далее восстановить разрушенный зуб коронкой.
2) удалить сместившийся 5 зуб, и вос…
🔥15❤8😱5🐳3👏2⚡1👍1😍1
Signed Арсен Эбеккуев
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @arsenebekkuev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @arsenebekkuev as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
3 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 months
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Иван / IVANSMEDIA / (официальный) @ivansmedia1 · 43,468 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 17 September 2026
Татьяна Буцкая @TatianaButskaya · 22,808 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Врач-стоматолог | Dr.Ebekkuev” (@arsenebekkuev), 14,130 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arsenebekkuev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.