Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for arsejke mentality

Channel

arsejke mentality

@arsejke

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

22subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003441299351
TypeChannel
Username@arsejke
DescriptionСлышь че реально немец дохуя или хули в Мюнхене забыл?
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 28 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/arsejke

Growth

227 August 2026 — 22 subscribers11 August 2026 — 22 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21–23 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 13:0422no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:3422first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 28 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
25
Videos
3

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 01s
Average length
40s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

32 reactions across 6 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1031.3%
825.0%
😍721.9%
🤣39.38%
🆒13.13%
👎13.13%
💩13.13%
🤡13.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Jul 2026, 22:16 UTC28 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Повезло же жить в самом красивом городе мира 🥰 (ну почти самом)

6🆒1

5 Apr 2026, 20:45 UTC213 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

Бля жесть как будто из отельных полотенец только живой

1 Apr 2026, 11:42 UTC214 viewsread 11 August 2026
Video

Град стучит с небес Интернет русскому не нужен Это же весна?

24 Feb 2026, 02:08 UTC207 viewsread 11 August 2026
Poll

Гайз, а вот куда бы вы поехали летом в отпуск? Я вот реально хз ваще. Но мне кажется, что Сицилия - это самый +вайб варик. Главное, чтобы местные доны карлеоне на бутылку с оливковым не посадили

  1. Хорватия5%
  2. Сицилия (Палермо)19%
  3. Черногория0%
  4. Барселона (МЕССИ МЕССИ МЕССИ АНКАРА МЕССИ АНКАРА МЕССИ АНКАРА МЕССИ 😱🤯🤯😱!!!!!)10%
  5. Мадейра (КРИШТИАНУ РОНАЛДУ CR7 МЕНТАЛИТИ SIIIIUUUU 😈😈😈)14%
  6. Канарские острова10%
  7. КАРЛОВЫ ВАРЫ В САНАТОРИЙ МАЗЮКАТЬСЯ ГРЯЗЬЮ И ПРОЧИМИ КОРИЧНЕВЫМИ МАССАМИ10%
  8. Лиссабон10%
  9. НА БОЛОТА24%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

23 Feb 2026, 09:34 UTC146 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

5к родственников финнов, жесть НО Я РУССКИЙ!!!!!!! Кстати 0% еврея еще. Слышал, что в Германии это очень ценится)))))))))))))))))

🔥4

19 Feb 2026, 14:04 UTC137 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Как же хорошо вернуться домой в любименький, хорошенький, маленький, пушистенький Мюнхенчик

1

18 Feb 2026, 13:24 UTC117 views8 reactionsread 11 August 2026

⚡️⚡️Короче первый урок конструктивный пост на канале Краткая рецензия по Венеции: Максимум на два дня, делать дальше абсолютно нехуй. Как вариант, поехать на соседние острова, мб, там норм. Но мы не ездили. Ходить по мостам через каналы прикольно первые минут 10, потом понимаешь, что они тупо все одинаковые. Зато путь от моста до моста - это узкая клоака между двумя домиками, которая набита людьми разных сортов. И

🔥5👎1💩1🤡1

18 Feb 2026, 10:59 UTC93 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Такого тебе кадра нарисовали: образованный, революционер

😍71🔥1

3 Feb 2026, 12:12 UTC123 viewsread 11 August 2026

Готов воспринимать футбол только в таком виде

3 Feb 2026, 12:12 UTC106 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @starina_rzhavchikVideo

Обзор 24 тура АПЛ #старинаэдит #обзортураАПЛ

28 Jan 2026, 14:34 UTC133 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Когда придумал крутой немецкий ник, но есть нюанс

🤣3

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @arsejke. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Feb 2026, 02:08 UTCAnonymous Poll21 voters

Гайз, а вот куда бы вы поехали летом в отпуск? Я вот реально хз ваще. Но мне кажется, что Сицилия - это самый +вайб варик. Главное, чтобы местные доны карлеоне на бутылку с оливковым не посадили

  1. Хорватия5%
  2. Сицилия (Палермо)19%
  3. Черногория0%
  4. Барселона (МЕССИ МЕССИ МЕССИ АНКАРА МЕССИ АНКАРА МЕССИ АНКАРА МЕССИ 😱🤯🤯😱!!!!!)10%
  5. Мадейра (КРИШТИАНУ РОНАЛДУ CR7 МЕНТАЛИТИ SIIIIUUUU 😈😈😈)14%
  6. Канарские острова10%
  7. КАРЛОВЫ ВАРЫ В САНАТОРИЙ МАЗЮКАТЬСЯ ГРЯЗЬЮ И ПРОЧИМИ КОРИЧНЕВЫМИ МАССАМИ10%
  8. Лиссабон10%
  9. НА БОЛОТА24%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 28 January 2026 to 19 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“arsejke mentality” (@arsejke), 22 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arsejke.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.