все я распизделась очень давайте через год свидимся тут
💔76❤🔥26❤16🔥4💘3

Channel
@arsambleya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,340subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001260842073 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arsambleya |
| Created | 3 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 25 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arsambleya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 1,340 | +2 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 11:28 | 1,338 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:27 | 1,337 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:21 | 1,341 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:50 | 1,342 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 1,342 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 24 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2,062 reactions across 16 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 899 | 43.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 318 | 15.4% | |
| 🔥 | 226 | 11.0% | |
| 💘 | 217 | 10.5% | |
| 🍓 | 132 | 6.40% | |
| 💔 | 119 | 5.77% | |
| 👍 | 60 | 2.91% | |
| 🤝 | 37 | 1.79% | |
| ✍ | 21 | 1.02% | |
| 🤣 | 13 | 0.63% | |
| 🤯 | 10 | 0.485% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 0.242% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 0.145% | |
| 🥴 | 2 | 0.097% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,062reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2025 to 28 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
все я распизделась очень давайте через год свидимся тут
💔76❤🔥26❤16🔥4💘3
прикиньте как мне тяжело на работе, когда спрашивают где я училась монтировать и мне нужно пропускать такой огромный пласт моей жизни прикиньте сижу на собесе в детскую студию и говорю да вот зацените мое портфолио ну что где ваши дети начинаем съемку
❤🔥75❤35🔥25💔10💘2
эдиты делала… помните?
❤🔥52💔33❤19💘3
у меня все хорошо вроде, но потом я вижу сообщения в анонимке где предлагают купить у меня канал и я чувствую будто у меня пытаются часть моей жизни выкупить.... да я смотрю шоу раз в месяц для себя... но нет... тут вся моя жизнь.... перестаньте пожалуйста... он будет мертвый, но я не отдам этот канал под рекламу казино. вдруг я вернусь в фандом??? вдруг я начну делать эдиты опять? вдруг?
❤129🤝37🍓21💘5❤🔥3
нет я все конечно понимаю, но зачем арсений попов написал фанфик еще рассказал всем об этом. адекватно все?
💘85❤50🍓20👎5👍4
хихикаю
❤🔥57❤20💘13🍓2
аааааа
❤🔥48❤22💘14🍓4
нравится что экраны делают эдиты вместо меня
❤74🍓23💘19
ставьте класс если вы тоже не понимаете зачем арсений катается по зрителям в яйцеклетке
🔥79❤39🤣13💘3
я сдохла
❤72💘15
если честно я ничего не вижу и ничего не понимаю но мне очень нравится
❤67💘11❤🔥7
очень странный день
❤76❤🔥14💘2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @arsambleya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,244,286 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“арсамблея” (@arsambleya), 1,340 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arsambleya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.