www.aromashka.ru Ароматерапия. Аромасообщество. Свойства и применение эфирных масел. Рецепты смесей под разные задачи. Производство и продажа масел и натуральной косметики. Лицензированная школа ароматерапии.
Created
Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
8 measurements spanning 10 days, net -25. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,212–12,245 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 11:26
12,216
-3
16 Aug 2026, 02:25
12,219
+1
11 Aug 2026, 23:02
12,218
-2
10 Aug 2026, 21:33
12,220
-3
9 Aug 2026, 19:02
12,223
-10
8 Aug 2026, 16:17
12,233
-5
7 Aug 2026, 13:31
12,238
-3
7 Aug 2026, 09:03
12,241
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.32%
avg views ÷ 12,216 subscribers
Avg views / post
894
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
27 (30 July 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
24,147
Reactions total
1,022
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 20:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,830
Videos
≈1,040
Links
≈2,210
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 06s
Average length
27s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,022 reactions across 27 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
374
36.6%
🔥
284
27.8%
🤣
78
7.63%
👍
61
5.97%
❤🔥
50
4.89%
😁
26
2.54%
👀
19
1.86%
🥰
16
1.57%
😢
15
1.47%
🤔
15
1.47%
🙏
14
1.37%
💯
11
1.08%
😍
11
1.08%
💋
10
0.978%
custom 5202136969567562819
8
0.783%
🎉
8
0.783%
🐳
6
0.587%
👏
6
0.587%
🤩
5
0.489%
🫡
3
0.294%
2 further kinds
2
0.196%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,022reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Хочется использовать эфирные масла, но страшно ошибиться и навредить?
Мы знаем, что у вас есть сомнения: в дозировках, в методах, в общем количестве ароматерапии на душу 😉
📎Существуют примерно такие стадии развития отношений с эфирными маслами:
1⃣ Ароматерапия - это полезно и натурально, буду добавлять всегда, везде и много!
2⃣ Ароматерапия - это высокие концентрации, риски сенсибилизации и нагрузка на печень. Бо…
Иногда надо доверять чуйке 😎
Эта партия дезодорантов вообще-то должна была уехать на склады Wildberries.
Товар был произведён, всё готово к отгрузке, но по какой-то причине мы не торопились его отвозить. А потом случилась атака на склады ВБ.
В общем, то ли нам повезло, то ли сработала та самая предпринимательская чуйка, которую невозможно внести ни в один бизнес-план 😅
Но факт остаётся фактом: свежая партия дезодор…
⌛С чего начать? Вот с этого! Правильное начало, которое случается только раз в год
Всем, кто хочет использовать эфирные масла в своей жизни, очень рекомендуем приглядеться к грядущему курсу: именно с него начинается всё обучение ароматерпии. Дальше вы уже не растеряетесь: сможете пойти на любые курсы и практиковать сами, потому что у вас будет БАЗА.
📌База – это технология как пользоваться эфирными маслами. «Сколько…
💔 Лето ещё не кончилось, а мы уже по нему скучаем
Вроде бы лето ещё здесь, но в воздухе уже витает щемящая грусть, пришедшая вместе с пожелтевшими листьями и звенящим осенним воздухом. Внутри всё сжимается: о нет, нет, ещё не пора, я не успела надышаться, накупаться, насладиться! Это синдром «последнего вагона», который может украсть самый сладкий последний кусочек лета.
📌 Давайте договоримся: этот август мы не про…
Экономика самоуважения работает так: чем дороже помада, тем выше требования к кандидатам на поцелуй 😂
Правда, если взять лецитиновый бальзам для губ - недорого, натурально и губы мягкие - на неподходящих кандидатов всё равно жалко. Дело принципа! 👊
🦟Самый простой спрей от комаров за 120р.
Я использовала эфирные масла лемонграсса и герани - бюджетные и известные своей репеллентной силой.
📝Рецепт:
🟡ЭМ лемонграсса - 10к.
🟡ЭМ герани - 10к.
🟡Органический солюбилизатор - 1/3 ч.л.
🟡Дистиллированная вода - 100мл
📌Смешать эфирные масла с солюбилизатором (можно взять полисорбат) и растворить в воде. Всё! Спрей готов за 1 минуту. Перелить во флакончик и встряхнуть пере…
Кажется, мы забыли рассказать вам одну важную вещь про доставку 😎
Вот такое письмо получили от нашей клиентки:
«Здравствуйте, Ирина. Хотела поблагодарить Вас за возможность заказать товар в отдалённый пункт. Я летом обычно не заказываю Аромашку, так как живу в деревне, а ближайший город, в котором есть СДЭК, далеко. А тут решила посмотреть варианты и обнаружила, что доставка может быть в 5ку, а она, ну прям в каждом…
📱Aromashka в вашем телефоне: уже попробовали наши приложение?
«Все заказы теперь через приложение»
«Ну наконец-то что-то работает без ВПН, всегда можно написать по заказу и получить оперативный ответ»
«Мне красиво!»
✉️Вот что говорят те, кто уже поставил приложение.
❓А что скажете вы? Что вам понравилось или нет, каких функций не хватает?
Будем благодарны вам за отзывы! Мы очень старались сделать для вас удобную п…
❤🔥20🥰12❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @aromashka_news. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 265,846 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Aromashka — эфирные масла” (@aromashka_news), 12,216 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aromashka_news.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.