Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💦ARKASHA'S INFO

Channel

💦ARKASHA'S INFO

@arkashkainfo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002367115477
TypeChannel
Username@arkashkainfo
Created11 February 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/arkashkainfo

Growth

814 Aug 2026, 07:18 — 8 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 07:30 — 8 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 07:1814 Aug 2026, 07:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–9 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:308no change
14 Aug 2026, 07:188first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 11 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

28 reactions across 4 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳725.0%
621.4%
custom 5420326621078898934517.9%
🕊517.9%
custom 5424940279243247712310.7%
custom 617011938572685021727.14%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2025 to 3 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Jan 2026, 16:50 UTC53 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026

Я думаю, что скоро сделаю вишлист к своему др...

custom 54249402792432477123custom 54203266210788989342custom 61701193857268502172

30 Oct 2025, 15:31 UTC190 views9 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Poll

Кто вы для меня? 😎

  1. бро/много общаемся 🌟26%
  2. одноклассник/одногруппник🌟26%
  3. со мной в одной/нескольких группах/флудах/сетках/кф состоите 🌟32%
  4. человек из прошлого 🌟13%
  5. не знакомы, но хотите начать общение 🌟10%
  6. мимоходом зашли сюда 🌟26%
  7. мой папищек 🍮26%

The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🐳3custom 542032662107889893432🕊1

30 Oct 2025, 15:31 UTC153 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🌟🤍🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🤩 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🤍 🖱 𝐲𝐨𝐮 𝐜𝐚𝐧 𝐚𝐝𝐝 𝐦𝐞 𝐚𝐬 𝐚 𝐟𝐫𝐢𝐞𝐧𝐝 🤩🤩🤩🤩 🪦🪦 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 TT: basil_and_watermelon 🌟 DC: ogurchikmalosolka 🌟 rave: @суглинистая_аркаша 🌟 Pjsk GLOB: 375552364763119624 🌟 MOBLE LEGENDS BB: 1915980069 (6960) 🌟 Дурак Онлайн: kqeLMj02 🌟 Reverse 1999: 411458805 🌟

2🐳2🕊2

30 Oct 2025, 15:31 UTC143 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

❌ 🌟🤍 🌟 🌟 🤩🤩🤩 🌟✨🌟 ┏━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┓ 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠'🔠 🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟☁️🌟 🌟🌟🌟 🌟 🔠🔠🔠🔠 😺 🔠🔠🔠🔠 ┗━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┛ 🌟🤩🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🤩🌟🤩🌟 🤍 『 '« 🍎 •° 💊 』 🦴╰┈➤ 𝟏𝟔 𝐲.𝐨. ┈∘∘┐ 𝐸𝑁𝐹𝑃-𝑇 4𝑤3 〰️ 𝔰𝔥𝔢/𝔥𝔢𝔯 ≧ 𝔞𝔫𝔶 🤩 𝗥𝗨𝗦 / 𝗘𝗚𝗬 🤩 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🔠🔠🔠🔠 🥹😳 🌟 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 𝐷𝑒𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑢𝑛𝑒, 𝐾𝑛𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡𝑠 𝑜𝑓 𝐺𝑢𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑒, 𝑇𝐴𝐷𝐶, 𝐸𝑣𝑎𝑛𝑔𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑁𝑒𝑒𝑑𝑦 𝑆𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑟 𝑂𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑙𝑜𝑎𝑑, 𝑅𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑒 1999, 𝑆𝐻𝑇𝐷𝑁, 𝐻𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒𝑟...

2🐳2🕊2

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @arkashkainfo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Oct 2025, 15:31 UTCAnonymous Poll31 voters

Кто вы для меня? 😎

  1. бро/много общаемся 🌟26%
  2. одноклассник/одногруппник🌟26%
  3. со мной в одной/нескольких группах/флудах/сетках/кф состоите 🌟32%
  4. человек из прошлого 🌟13%
  5. не знакомы, но хотите начать общение 🌟10%
  6. мимоходом зашли сюда 🌟26%
  7. мой папищек 🍮26%

The shares total 159%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2025 to 3 January 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 574,838 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💦ARKASHA'S INFO” (@arkashkainfo), 8 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arkashkainfo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.