Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Аркадій Петросян|Допомога ВПО

Channel

Аркадій Петросян|Допомога ВПО

@arkadiipetrosyann

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

17,763subscribers

-444 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001302214029
TypeChannel
Username@arkadiipetrosyann
Created12 August 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/arkadiipetrosyann

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

17,76318,20717,9857 August 2026 — 18,207 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,207 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,202 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,190 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,179 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,164 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,154 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,150 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,139 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,131 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,112 subscribers17 August 2026 — 18,095 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,092 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,064 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,048 subscribers21 August 2026 — 18,034 subscribers22 August 2026 — 18,025 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,008 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,004 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,983 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,970 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,965 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,956 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,947 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,931 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,924 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,915 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,901 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,875 subscribers8 September 2026 — 17,847 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,828 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,808 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,795 subscribers16 September 2026 — 17,777 subscribers19 September 2026 — 17,763 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net -444. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,696–18,274 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 01:0017,763-14
16 Sept 2026, 12:5617,777-18
14 Sept 2026, 17:5817,795-13
13 Sept 2026, 05:2017,808-20
11 Sept 2026, 04:1917,828-19
8 Sept 2026, 10:0017,847-28
5 Sept 2026, 07:4117,875-26
3 Sept 2026, 11:4017,901-14
2 Sept 2026, 05:1317,915-9
1 Sept 2026, 07:0617,924-7
31 Aug 2026, 08:1617,931-16
30 Aug 2026, 06:1817,947-9
29 Aug 2026, 07:2817,956-9
28 Aug 2026, 08:2517,965-5
27 Aug 2026, 10:5517,970-13
26 Aug 2026, 13:3417,983-21
25 Aug 2026, 10:1218,004-4
24 Aug 2026, 13:1518,008-17
22 Aug 2026, 17:2518,025-9
21 Aug 2026, 10:1818,034first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 16 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.3%
avg views ÷ 17,763 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,540
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.76%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held33 (16 July 20262 September 2026)
Views total12,720
Reactions total224
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 08:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 12s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,598 reactions across 33 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬41926.2%
35322.1%
👍27517.2%
😁17310.8%
😢16110.1%
🔥1227.63%
🙏885.51%
🥰70.438%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,598 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 15:03 UTC≈1,450 views24 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

В мирні часи корупція — це злочин, а під час війни — вбивство. Сьогодні відбулося засідання Вищого антикорупційного суду у справі щодо директора правління Sense Bank Сергія Ступака, якого обвинувачують у незаконних фінансових операціях, пов’язаних із внесенням застав за фігурантів так званого «Міндічгейту». Нашою спільнотою слідкуємо за перебігом правосуддя щодо всіх фігурантів корупційних справ. Бо мародерство під ч

12👍10😁2

2 Sept 2026, 13:39 UTC≈1,360 views44 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @Sofiya_FedynaVideo

Позавчора мене набрала мама Героя України Степана Чубенка. Назавжди 16-літнього хлопця, якого московські окупанти вбили його трьома пострілами в голову у 2014 році. За синьо-жовту стрічку і за те, що він не зрікся України у рідному Краматорську. Подзвонила вона щоб розповісти, що школа в Краматорську, яка носила його імʼя, закрита. А їі, Сталіну Чубенко, яка боролася за збереження школи та памʼяті про сина, звільни

29🤬11😁2😢2

27 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC≈3,240 views104 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🕯️Вірила, що повернеться додому. Під час обстрілу ТЦ у Кривому Розі загинула бахмутянка На момент ворожого удару Наталія Піменова перебувала на території торгового центру “Сонячна галерея“, у який влучили окупанти — працювала пекарем у “Сільпо”. Того дня її робоча зміна закінчилася близько 16-ї години. Жінка переодягнулася та зайшла до крамниці за покупками як відвідувачка. У цей момент відбулося влучання. Рідні

😢91🙏7🤬6

26 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC≈3,290 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Poll

Чи можливо проводити вибори під час воєнного стану?

  1. Так, але з пропрацьованим механізмом67%
  2. Ні33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

🤬31

25 Aug 2026, 07:24 UTC≈3,380 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

❗️ Ексзаступницю голови ОП Ірину Мудру суд відправив під варту із заставою 20 млн грн.

🤬24👍15😁72

18 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC≈4,890 views43 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @kartonprotestVideo

ДРУЗІ МАКСИМАЛЬНИЙ РОЗГОЛОС🔥🔥🔥 Завтра 19 серпня о 09:01 біля Верховної ради.

23🔥7😁5🤬4👍3🥰1

15 Aug 2026, 17:53 UTC≈6,180 views36 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Що далі буде з протестами? На мою думку, найближчим часом протести на площі Франка можуть дещо згаснути за інтенсивністю. Після тривалого періоду щоденних акцій ми вся природно втомлюємося, а відсутність реакції з боку президента і влади знижує мобілізаційний ресурс. Водночас це не означає завершення нашого протесту як такого. Станом на зараз влада фактично не демонструє готовності переглядати кадрове рішення щодо

17🙏9😁5👍4🥰1

14 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC≈3,920 views41 reactionsread 3 September 2026

❗️Москва не має наміру припиняти бойові дії на поточній лінії зіткнення, — голова МЗС рф лавров

🤬36😁4😢1

13 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC≈4,460 views59 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🖐️💸У мирний час корупція — це злочин, а під час війни — вбивство!

🔥379👍8😁3🥰2

12 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC≈4,280 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @kartonprotestPhoto

Президент досі не зробив жодного подання на посади голів ключових міністерств, проте вже зовсім скоро Верховна Рада відновить пленарне засідання і можна буде проголосувати за відповідні кадрові рішення. З цієї нагоди запрошую долучитися до протестної ходи, щоб вкотре нагадати президенту про важливість діалогу між владою та суспільством, а також про те, що саме президент має нести відповідальність за результати всіх

25😁1

11 Aug 2026, 10:47 UTC≈4,550 views44 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Франка — це вже не просто площа. Це питання того, чи чує влада суспільство. Люди виходять не тому, що їм «нічим зайнятися» і не тому, що хтось хоче дестабілізації країни. Люди виходять, бо вважають, що рішення, які визначають майбутнє держави, мають ухвалюватися прозоро, професійно і з відповідальністю перед суспільством. Протест на Франка розпочинався з конкретної вимоги — повернути Михайла Федорова та дати можливіс

32🔥7👍3😁2

11 Aug 2026, 08:52 UTC≈3,290 views20 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🐈Котик і пачки готівки: столичний лікар-невролог за 💵6–10 тис допомагав здоровим людям отримати інвалідність для уникнення мобілізації, — прокуратура Під час 36 обшуків вилучили $300 тис., €18 тис., 388 тис. грн, телефони, комп’ютери та медичні документи.

8🤬8😁4

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @arkadiipetrosyann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTCAnonymous Poll336 voters

Чи можливо проводити вибори під час воєнного стану?

  1. Так, але з пропрацьованим механізмом67%
  2. Ні33%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

21 Jul 2026, 13:07 UTCAnonymous Poll423 voters

Якби вибори президента відбилися цієї неділі, за кого відасте голос?

  1. Залужний11%
  2. Зеленський13%
  3. Федоров20%
  4. Порошенко29%
  5. Тимошенко8%
  6. Буданов9%
  7. Разумков11%
  8. Бойко6%
  9. Білецький3%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Україна тут | Новини
@UkrainaTut1 · 50,159
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Аркадій Петросян|Допомога ВПО” (@arkadiipetrosyann), 17,763 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arkadiipetrosyann.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.