فلسفه نماز 🌱 و اینکه چرا برای انسان مفیده⁉️ ❌بدون توجه به مسئله مذهبی ✅بررسی از دیدگاه انرژی با منابع معتبر __ @arezujazb368|معجزه.زندگی ____ #نماز
❤76👏4🙏4🤩2

Channel
@arezujazb368
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
45,378subscribers
-417 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001884460511 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arezujazb368 |
| Description | اگر دعوت شدی به اینجا😃بدون خدامیخوادمعجزه ای بهت هدیه بده😍❤️ فکرتو عوض کن زندگیت خودش عوض میشه✅️ نتایج کانال :👇 @arezuresult ایدی شخصی خانم جوکار برای پرسیدن سوالات👇 @aramesh3321 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arezujazb368 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 45,378 | -85 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 45,463 | -64 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:37 | 45,527 | -45 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:24 | 45,572 | -25 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:32 | 45,597 | -44 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:23 | 45,641 | -41 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:33 | 45,682 | -42 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 45,724 | -53 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 45,777 | -18 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 45,795 | first reading |
90 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 90 (5 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 184,750 |
| Reactions total | 7,097 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 23:52 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7,097 reactions across 90 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5,443 | 76.7% | |
| 👏 | 381 | 5.37% | |
| 👍 | 369 | 5.20% | |
| 🥰 | 337 | 4.75% | |
| 🔥 | 195 | 2.75% | |
| 🙏 | 115 | 1.62% | |
| 🤩 | 68 | 0.958% | |
| 👌 | 44 | 0.62% | |
| ❤🔥 | 38 | 0.535% | |
| 😍 | 34 | 0.479% | |
| 🎉 | 15 | 0.211% | |
| 🤷♀ | 11 | 0.155% | |
| 🕊 | 10 | 0.141% | |
| 🤗 | 10 | 0.141% | |
| 💯 | 9 | 0.127% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 0.07% | |
| 😇 | 3 | 0.042% | |
| 😘 | 3 | 0.042% | |
| 🫡 | 3 | 0.042% | |
| 😁 | 2 | 0.028% | |
| 1 further kind | 2 | 0.028% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 90 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,097reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
فلسفه نماز 🌱 و اینکه چرا برای انسان مفیده⁉️ ❌بدون توجه به مسئله مذهبی ✅بررسی از دیدگاه انرژی با منابع معتبر __ @arezujazb368|معجزه.زندگی ____ #نماز
❤76👏4🙏4🤩2
خب، دیگه وقتِ رونماییه! 🎉 امشب⏰ ساعت ۲۰:۰۰ (۸ شب)،⏰ این فایلِ صوتی رو همینجا توی کانال میذارم.😍 اگر میخواید یاد بگیرید چطور اون تمرینِ روزانه رو تبدیل کنید به یه “شارژرِ قدرتمندِ انرژی”، امشب همراه من باشید.🔌🔋 گوشهاتون رو تیز کنید، چون قراره یه عادتِ قدیمی رو با یه نگاهِ جدید بازسازی کنیم. میبینمتون! 😉⏳
❤102🙏9🥰5🕊4👍3🔥1🤩1
این چند روز داشتم روی یه فایلِ صوتیِ خاص کار میکردم.📯📲 🚫نمیخوام متن سخنرانی باشه؛ 👂میخوام وقتی گوشش میدید، 👤دقیقاً حس کنید بدنتون داره دوباره تراز میشه. ✅یه تکنیکِ کاملاً علمی و انرژیایی که نگاهتون رو به کلِ اون تمرینِ ۵ مرحلهای عوض میکنه.💫⚡️
❤63🎉3🤩3🕊2🔥1
دلیلِ اینکه خیلیها ازاین تمرین نتیجه نمیگیرن،😫 ❌اینه که با “آگاهی” انجامش نمیدن.❌ ✅فقط حرکتِ فیزیکیه. بدونِ آگاهی، اون تمرین مثلِ یه موبایلِ خاموشه که فقط به شارژر وصله، ولی شارژ نمیشه! 🔌🪫 میخوام امروز بهتون یاد بدم چطور اون “دکمه روشن” رو بزنید.💡😍
❤63🤩4🔥3
من به عنوان کسی که هم روانشناس هستم و هم انرژیکارم، همیشه دنبالِ پلِ بینِ “جسم” و “روح” هستم.🧠🫀 تازه فهمیدم که اون تمرینِ ۵ مرحلهای، دقیقاً روی مغز و جریانِ خونِ بدن اثر میذاره که باعث میشه سیستم عصبیمون اتوماتیکوار “آروم” بشه. 💆💆♀ 💥یعنی عملاً دارید خودتون رو “دیفراگ (Defrag)”💥 میکنید! 🧠✨
❤57🔥5🤩3
سلام به همگی! 😍 ✅دیروز کلی پیام گرفتم که «آرزوجان، بالاخره اون تمرینِ انرژیسازی که گفتی چیه؟»🤷♀ امروز میخوام کمی عمیقتر بشیم. 😍 خیلیها از من میپرسن چطور میشه وسطِ این همه استرس و درگیریِ ذهنی، «مرکزیت» خودمون رو حفظ کنیم؟ 😌🥹 📌جوابش دقیقاً همون چیزیه که دیروز گفتم؛ یه تمرینِ در دسترس که اکثرِ ما ازش غافلیم.
❤49👏6🔥3🎉2🤷♀1
👌👌👌👌 عصرتون بخیر و شب پیش روی همگی شما پر از آرامش🌚💫 ____ @arezujazb368|معجزه.زندگی
❤102👍13👏7🥰6🔥2🕊1🫡1
امروز نمیخوام بیشتر بازش کنم🤭 فقط همینقدر بدونید که یه تمرینِ روزانه📆 هست که خیلیا فکر میکنن فقط یه عادتِ سادهست، ❌اما در واقع یک “مدیتیشنِ حرکتیِ ۵ مرحلهایه” برای بازسازیِ هاله.🧘♀🧘 💎فردا قراره پرده از یه رازِ بزرگ بردارم.💎 آمادهاید؟ 😎
🥰93❤73👍24🔥5👏2🤩1
توی کلاسهای روانشناسی و انرژی، همیشه به بچهها میگم:👇 «دنبالِ درمانهای گرونقیمت نباشید، درمان توی سیستمِ خودتونه!»✅ گاهی اوقات یه حرکتِ سادهی فیزیکی، اگر با آگاهی انجام بشه، میتونه جایِ یه جلسه انرژیدرمانیِ سنگین رو بگیره.👌😍 ⁉️فکرکنم کنجکاو شدید بدونید اون تکنیک ساده و قابل دسترس چیه؟ 😉
❤91😍10👍7🔥2👏1
❌ببینید، بحثم اصلاً مذهبی یا عرفانیِ کلاسیک نیست.❌ ✅ بحثِ “تکنولوژیِ بدنه”. ⚙️ همونطور که گوشیتون نیاز داره هر شب به شارژر وصل بشه،🔌 سیستمِ انرژیِ ما هم یه “پورتِ ورودی”🔮 داره. اگر ندونیم چطور از این پورت استفاده کنیم، هاله ما مدام “نشت انرژی” پیدا میکنه.🪫
❤82👍13🔥5👏3
✅توی دنیای انرژی، یه قانونی داریم که میگه: «انرژیهای محیطیِ سنگین، مثل گرد و غبار میشینن روی هاله ما.» 🌪️➰ خیلی وقتا ما دنبالِ راهحلهای پیچیده میگردیم🤦♀ اما یه تکنیک خیلی در دسترس وجود داره که اکثرِ مردم، یا از کنارش بیتفاوت رد میشن یا بدون آگاهی انجامش میدن🤷♀ ⁉️ واقعاً حیف نیست؟🥹
❤85👍6🔥4😍3🤗1
بچهها تا حالا دقت کردید بعضی روزا، حتی اگه کار خاصی هم نکرده باشید، انگار یه کولهبار خستگی روی شونهتونه؟😢 انگار باتریتون سریع خالی میشه؟ 🪫 ما کلی تکنیکِ انرژیدرمانی 💫بلدیم، ❗️ اما گاهی اوقات اون “اتصالِ اصلی” قطع میشه.⛓💥 میخوام این دو روز ✌️با هم درباره این موضوع صحبت کنیم. 🗣 حواستون اینجا باشه!😃😍
❤90👍6🙏5🔥3😇1
Showing the 12 most recent of 90 posts we hold for @arezujazb368. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
چند نفرتون فایل پی دی اف دیشب رو باز کردید؟ و نگاه کردید؟😍 (میخوام ببینم اگر تعداد زیاد هست ازاین نوع تمرین ها بیشتر بذارم که رشدتون سریع تر بشه🌱🫶)
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
حالا برات پیش اومده اکستنشن کنی یا موهات رو بفروشی و بعدش حسِ سنگینیِ عجیبی داشته باشی؟» 😃😍
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 90 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 267,420 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“معجزه.زندگی | آرزوجوکار” (@arezujazb368), 45,378 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arezujazb368.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.