Channel
@arefyevstudio
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Cite this entry
779subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001303569142 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arefyevstudio |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arefyevstudio |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 779 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 782 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:46 | 786 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 786 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,194 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
DEVPROAUDIO REVERSIDE Review: Advanced 3D Reverb or Just More Controls? Our editorial review explores REVERSIDE's dual-engine algorithmic architecture, independent Early and Late Reflections, room modeling, workflow, CPU considerations, and practical value for professional mixing and sound design. The focus is on real production implications rather than marketing claims. ⭐️ Editorial rating: 8.7/10 #AudioProduct…
TK Audio TK-Lizer 3 Review: Transparent Baxandall EQ for Modern Mastering The TK Audio TK-Lizer 3 is evaluated from a mastering engineer's perspective, covering its revised analog circuitry, integrated Mid-Side processing, Baxandall EQ topology, and real-world performance in hybrid mastering workflows. The review also compares it with leading analog mastering equalizers and examines where it offers genuine workflo…
Origin Effects EQDELUXE Review: Pultec-Inspired Analog EQ for Guitar & Bass Recording EQDELUXE is evaluated from a recording engineer's perspective, focusing on passive analog EQ behavior, tracking workflow, studio integration, practical limitations, and comparisons with competing hardware and software solutions. ⭐️ Editorial rating: 8.8/10 #OriginEffects #GuitarRecording #AudioProduction Read the full article:
UAD EMT 140 & EMT 250 Native Review: Classic Reverbs Without the DSP Requirement The native release of the UAD EMT 140 and EMT 250 brings two long-established reverb plugins to CPU-based workflows without changing their underlying DSP. The review examines real-world mixing and mastering applications, workflow improvements, and how these classic reverbs compare with today's leading native alternatives. #UniversalA…
Minimal Audio Lucid Review: Granular Workflow with Musical Control Our editorial review examines Minimal Audio Lucid from a production perspective, covering Grain Scale Lock, Timeline Sync, workflow efficiency, CPU considerations, and how it compares with today's leading granular plugins. ⭐️ Editorial rating: 9.3/10 #MinimalAudio #PluginReview #MusicProduction Read the full article:
Mastering The Mix MIXVAULT Review: A Different Approach to EQ Workflow Mastering The Mix MIXVAULT replaces traditional curve editing with a perceptual EQ workflow built around loudness-matched tonal shaping and reference-assisted analysis. Our editorial review examines where this approach delivers measurable workflow improvements—and where conventional parametric EQs remain the better choice. ⭐️ Editorial rating:…
Heavyocity VAST Review: Creative Convolution Beyond Traditional Reverb Heavyocity VAST is evaluated from a production workflow perspective, covering its Impulse Engine architecture, custom impulse response support, real-world mixing applications, CPU behavior, and practical value for cinematic sound design. ⭐️ Editorial rating: 9.3/10 #Heavyocity #MusicProduction #AudioEngineering Read the full article:
Rhodes Clav Pro Review: Is It the Best Virtual Clavinet Plugin? Our editorial review examines Rhodes Clav Pro from a production engineer's perspective, covering workflow, playability, mix integration, and how it compares with Keyscape, Scarbee, and other leading Clavinet plugins. We also evaluate where it delivers genuine production value—and where a broader keyboard collection may still be the better choice. ⭐️…
SSL Odyssey Review: ActiveAnalogue and the Future of Analog Console Workflow SSL Odyssey is examined from a production workflow perspective, focusing on ActiveAnalogue technology, instant analog recall, modular architecture and its practical impact on commercial recording, mixing and mastering studios. The review also compares Odyssey with SSL Oracle, API Vision and Neve Genesys Black, separating genuine workflow…
Drawmer OC1 vs FC1 Review: Which 500 Series Compressor Fits Your Workflow? Our editorial review explores Drawmer's first optical compressor alongside its new FET design, focusing on workflow, real-world recording, mixing and mastering applications, and how both modules compare with established 500 Series alternatives. ⭐️ Editorial rating: 9.3/10 #Drawmer #Mixing #Mastering Read the full article: 👇 Choose your l…
Dangerous Music BAX EQ Plugin Review: Is It Worth Buying? The official Dangerous Music BAX EQ Plugin is examined from a mastering engineer's perspective, including Bax EQ workflow, Mid-Side processing, CPU efficiency, and comparisons with Brainworx BAX EQ, FabFilter Pro-Q 4, and Weiss EQ MP. ⭐️ Editorial rating: 8.9/10 #Mastering #AudioPlugins #Mixing Read the full article:
W. A. Production Squelcher Review: Bass Enhancement, Workflow & Real-World Performance Squelcher is evaluated from a practical mixing perspective, covering harmonic bass enhancement, low-end translation, workflow efficiency, and how it compares with tools like Waves RBass and FabFilter Saturn 2. ⭐️ Editorial rating: 8.9/10 #MusicProduction #Mixing #AudioPlugins Read the full article:
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @arefyevstudio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AREFYEV STUDIO | Audio News” (@arefyevstudio), 779 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arefyevstudio.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.