Channel
@arcticacrypto
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,053subscribers
+138 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002996624576 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arcticacrypto |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arcticacrypto |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 1,053 | +17 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:08 | 1,036 | +12 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 1,024 | +24 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 1,000 | +50 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 950 | +35 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 915 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 915 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (1 August 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,152 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
BTC > 65k $, o tuo metu LTH SOPR nukrito žemiau 1. Šiuo metu rodiklis siekia 0,92. Ilgalaikiai holderiai (LTH) ir toliau parduoda savo Bitcoin. Iki didžiausio ankstesnių bear market išpardavimo lygio, kai SOPR siekė apie 0,5, dar yra kur kristi. Be to, vidutiniškai LTH vis dar yra apie +30% pliuse, palyginti su savo pirkimo kaina. Istoriškai būtent tada, kai dauguma LTH parduodavo Bitcoin žemiau savo pirkimo kaino…
👀 Trumpas pareiškė, kad JAV nenori, jog Kinija ar Japonija perimtų kriptovaliutų rinkos kontrolę. Trumpas ir toliau palaiko CLARITY Act.
🔥👀 Kraustomės į Tailandą? Tailande panaikintas mokestis nuo pelno, gauto prekiaujant Bitcoin ir kitomis kriptovaliutomis, jei prekiaujate per licencijuotas kriptovaliutų platformas.
❗️Dėmesio visiems, kurie prekiauja per WEEX Android įrenginiuose Pastebėjome, kad nemažai vartotojų susidūrė su problema, jog nepavyksta atnaujinti WEEX programėlės Android telefonuose. Jei turite šią problemą, atlikite šiuos veiksmus: 1. Ištrinkite dabartinę WEEX programėlę. 2. Atsisiųskite naujausią oficialią APK versiją iš čia: https://www.weex.com/download 3. Įdiekite programėlę pagal pateiktą instrukciją. iP…
Banginiai toliau kaupia ETH ☕️ Šiandien net trys stambūs žaidėjai papildė savo Ethereum pozicijas beveik už 43 mln $. Vienas pervedė iš OKX apie 20 mln $ į ETH. Antrasis per OTC įsigijo ETH už 19,1 mln $, o per pastarąją savaitę jo pirkimai jau viršijo 52 mln $. Trečiasis iškeitė UNI į ETH už maždaug 3 mln $. Ir dar vienas įdomus faktas: šiandien per Galaxy Digital kažkas nupirko Bitcoin už beveik 100 mln $ 👀. Vo…
Šis scenarijus jau buvo? 😈 Manau, visi pastebėjo, kiek dabar informacinėje erdvėje yra pozityvių naujienų apie Artimuosius Rytus. Dėl to naftos kaina krenta, o pasaulio akcijų rinkos kyla. Prognozių čia nėra. Jau ne kartą matėme, kaip situacija gali apsiversti 180 laipsnių. Jei šalims pagaliau pavyks susitarti, puiku. Jei ne, prie tokios situacijos jau esame pripratę ir tiesiog dirbsime pagal aplinkybes, ieškodami …
Laukia naujas low taškas? 👋 BTC įplaukos į biržas = potenciali pasiūla pardavimui. Teigiamas funding + augantis Open Interest = atidaroma vis daugiau long pozicijų. Jei sudėsime 2+2, gausime galimą spaudimą rinkai dėl BTC pardavimų, o po to ir long pozicijų likvidacijas. Tai gali tapti priežastimi stipriam kainos kritimui ir dabartinio low taško pramušimui.
Apsisukimas ar mus tiesiog spaudžia žemyn? 😱 Kas vyksta rinkoje? Nors vakar sulaukėme visai neblogo atšokimo, labiau atrodė, kad tai buvo short pozicijų likvidavimas. Po naujienų apie Strategy vykdomus BTC pardavimus rinkos dalyviai pradėjo agresyviai atidarinėti short pozicijas, o jų buvo likviduota už maždaug 170 mln$. Apskritai neigiami veiksniai ir rizikos išlieka tokie patys. Be Saylor ir jo pardavimų, priside…
❗️Trumpas: Iranas maldavo surengti susitikimą, o derybos jau prasidėjo. Taip pat suplanuoti ir tolesni susitikimai. JAV karinės jūrų pajėgos visiškai kontroliuoja Hormūzo sąsiaurį. Trumpas blokadą pavadino „Geležine siena“. Pasak jo, į Iraną niekas nepatenka, kol nebus pasiektas susitarimas arba Iranas visiškai pasiduos. Tuo tarpu Iranas oficialiai neigia, kad vyksta bet kokios derybos su JAV.
🟢 PMI: 55,6. Viršijo prognozę (54) ir pasiekė aukščiausią lygį nuo 2022 metų birželio. Aukštesnis nei tikėtasi PMI signalizuoja apie geresnę ekonominę situaciją 👀 Kol kas tik stebime situaciją.
🤬 Per šį kilimą buvo likviduota short pozicijų už 75 mln $.
😱 Dar vienas banginis ruošiasi BTC pardavimui? Šiandien vienas banginis po 7 mėnesių tylos pervedė visus savo 16 400 BTC (apie 1,04 mlrd $), į naują piniginę. Manoma, kad tai galėjo būti OTC sandoris arba pasiruošimas pardavimui.
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @arcticacrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 306,333 of 1,629,452 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Arctica Crypto” (@arcticacrypto), 1,053 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arcticacrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.