Channel
@arct_sun
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
27subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001195231894 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @arct_sun |
| Description | Юля и 🐈🐈⬛ |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/arct_sun |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:01 | 27 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:08 | 27 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 27 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (27 June 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 91 |
| Reactions total | 18 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
63 reactions across 6 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5438588194956281448 | 17 | 27.0% | |
| custom 5334595762430972346 | 10 | 15.9% | |
| custom 5246966223295519573 | 9 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5204261926112105311 | 7 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5438639592829926177 | 7 | 11.1% | |
| custom 5438314244762273830 | 4 | 6.35% | |
| custom 5409232733438255010 | 3 | 4.76% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 4.76% | |
| custom 5213324706538622234 | 2 | 3.17% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 1.59% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 27 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
когда задумался о будущем и вдруг понял, что лучше броситься под поезд.
custom 53345957624309723462🗿1custom 54092327334382550101custom 54383142447622738301custom 54386395928299261771
Channel photo updated
А ещё нам повезло, нас где-то и на видео подсняли, и сосед по выставке предложил вместо телефона на камеру пофоткать) Но Женёк, изображающий демона на бампере, просто лучший 🥰 #tsunamipicnic@arct_sun #2026
custom 54385881949562814485custom 52469662232955195734custom 52042619261121053113
Сегодня у котиков была "кайфыришная" 🥰 (хотя кого я обманываю, у Булки она каждый день 😬) #котики@arct_sun
custom 52469662232955195735custom 54385881949562814485custom 52042619261121053114❤1
Были на Цунами пикнике. Уже какой-то там, 7-й год подряд. В этом году не понравилось, из всех предыдущих. Неудачная локация, было много недочётов. По погоде - сначала была лютая жара, а потом вот накрыло 🙈 Я успела сибаса с друзьями, которые уезжать собрались, в машину рооовно до начала этого пиздеца. Кира и остальные ребята застали всё вот это лично 😅 В этом году не фоткала ничего, спасибо Анюте, что заставила вс…
custom 53345957624309723463custom 54386395928299261773❤2custom 54092327334382550101custom 54383142447622738301
#мемдня@arct_sun
custom 54386395928299261773custom 53345957624309723462custom 54383142447622738302
Channel photo updated
Смеюсь 😬 Все кепки из одной карточки) Просто наглядно, как русский язык деградирует от фото к фото 👹 #мемдня@arct_sun
custom 54385881949562814487custom 53345957624309723463custom 52133247065386222342custom 54092327334382550101
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @arct_sun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“arct_sun” (@arct_sun), 27 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/arct_sun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.