Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Архитектурный Винегрет

Channel

Архитектурный Винегрет

@archvinegret

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,613subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001342855680
TypeChannel
Username@archvinegret
Created3 December 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/archvinegret

Growth

1,6131,6181,615.56 August 2026 — 1,617 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,617 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,618 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,616 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,613 subscribers6 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 11 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,612–1,619 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 09:441,613-3
13 Aug 2026, 16:371,616-2
10 Aug 2026, 06:061,618+1
6 Aug 2026, 08:331,617no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:281,617first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 11 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
no view readings in window
Avg views / post
no view readings
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 10 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 July 2026
Posts held10 (11 May 202623 July 2026)
Views total
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

61 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5183.6%
👍69.84%
23.28%
🔥23.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC315 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Привет, Винегрет! Серия материалов о доходном жилье завершилась. Собрала все посты вместе, сохраняйте себе: ⚪️ Книга «Петербургские доходные дома» Екатерины Юхневой ⚪️ «Красный ромб» и «Свободный гражданин» ⚪️ «Войти в одну реку» — воспоминания архитектора Ильи Рерберга ⚪️ Первые московские девелоперы ⚪️ Архитектурные конкурсы начала XX века ⚪️ Е. Гонцкевич и К° ⚪️ Подкаст «Как строили дома и как в них жили»

6

10 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC717 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Бюро UTRO в гостях у Архитектурного Винегрета с объектом MANOR Заказчик: MR Group Архитекторы: Марина Ярмаркина, Лейла Мифтахова, Анастасия Попова Год реализации: 2020 Сооснователь Бюро UTRO и главный архитектор проекта MANOR Марина Ярмаркина ответила на несколько важных вопросов об особенностях работы с историческим наследием. Мы поговорили с Мариной о технических аспектах проекта приспособления доходного дома 190

10👍2🔥1

4 Jul 2026, 12:34 UTC391 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если вы всерьез заинтересовались современными реконструкциями / реставрациями доходных домов в Москве, то ловите несколько локаций для воскресной прогулки с объектами, заслуживающими внимания. По клику можно сохранить адреса. 1. Саввинское подворье. Дом бережно отреставрирован. В одной из его частей находится музей (не посетила), в другой — квартиры. Всего шесть штук на один подъезд (его я посетила), невообразимая р

6👍1

3 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC370 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Последнее время много интересуюсь современной жизнью дореволюционных доходных домов. А поживают они по-разному. На московской улице Плющиха есть дом №37, который построил архитектор Василий Шауб-младший в самом начале XX века. В Москве у мастера работ немного, а вот в Петербурге их несколько десятков, ссылку на перечень с адресами и фотографиями оставлю тут. Любопытно, что в момент постройки здание отличалось внушит

5

13 Jun 2026, 12:15 UTC458 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Привет, Винегрет! Вчера в букинистическом среди альбомов, разобранных на отдельные листы, была найдена фотогравюра с неким доходным домом Сомова. После небольшого расследования удалось узнать, что этот лист — часть издания «Историческая панорама Санкт-Петербурга и окрестностей», вышедшего в 1915 году. Найти все его части можно здесь, а конкретно этот лист относится к девятой части о новом Петрограде. Дом сохранилс

52

28 May 2026, 07:35 UTC521 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Привет, Винегрет! Наверняка вы уже читали о последнем витке замыслов московских властей уничтожить Шуховскую башню и заменить ее свежим аттракционом в активно застраивающемся Донском районе. На днях портал АРХИ РУ опубликовал письмо со сбором подписей в защиту объекта от сноса. Я подписала это письмо. А ещё чуть раньше, в начале мая, вышел любопытный материал Айрата Багаутдинова с хроникой событий последних лет во

2👍2

25 May 2026, 09:34 UTC413 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Как строили дома и как в них жили Это заголовок выпуска одного из моих любимых подкастов — Заката Империи. Сегодня будет искренняя рекомендация, поскольку тема очень подходящая, да и сам выпуск очень мне понравился. Автор и ведущий подкаста — Андрей Аксёнов — рассказывает о том, какие были квартиры, дворы и парадные. О том, как дома проектировали и строили, кто и на каких этажах проживал. А ещё о том, почему дворни

5👍1🔥1

Signed Maria Serova

20 May 2026, 09:32 UTC432 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Е. Гонцкевич и К° Сегодня будет история об архитекторе Евгении Гонцкевиче, который по совместительству был учредителем земельно-строительного акционерного общества и домовладельцем. И немного о его предприимчивых коллегах. Гонцкевич не просто основал общество, которое проектировало и строило здания — он также владел лесопильным, столярно-паркетным и кирпичным заводами, которые помогали снабжать его объекты материал

4

Signed Maria Serova

11 May 2026, 10:57 UTC626 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как заказать проект доходного дома, если ты частный инвестор в Российской империи начала XX века? Один из вариантов — устроить архитектурный конкурс. Содействие в проведении такого мероприятия могло оказать Императорское Санкт-Петербургское Общество Архитекторов: его члены писали программу и готовили пакет исходных данных, а по окончании конкурса брали комиссию в процентах от общей суммы призового фонда за труды. На

8

Signed Maria Serova

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @archvinegret. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 977,851 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Архитектурный Винегрет” (@archvinegret), 1,613 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/archvinegret.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.