Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Архив меллстрой

Channel

Архив меллстрой

@archmellstroy

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002933017584
TypeChannel
Username@archmellstroy
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 10 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/archmellstroy

Growth

28 August 2026 — 2 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2 subscribers8 August 202614 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 6 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1–3 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 03:492no change
8 Aug 2026, 06:462first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 10 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
9
Videos
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

6 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 10 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Oct 2025, 20:11 UTC208 views5 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @MELLSTROYEVSKI_SHOP

Ну согласитесь, хоть это и маленькие деньги, зато как вы за них дрались и сколько разных эмоций это принесло

5

10 Oct 2025, 19:36 UTC204 views1 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @MELLSTROYEVSKI_SHOPPhoto

Призы выданы.

1

10 Oct 2025, 19:36 UTC97 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @MELLSTROYEVSKI_SHOP

📌1 место — испанец и Truslent 500₽ 📌2 место — слив старой женщины 100 звезд 📌3 место — яйцо об голову 200 руб (она мне помогала искать людей) Всем удачи в следующих разах!

10 Oct 2025, 19:36 UTC105 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @MELLSTROYEVSKI_SHOP

Победители, отпишите в лс)

10 Oct 2025, 19:20 UTC70 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @MELLSTROYEVSKI_SHOP

📌1 место — испанец и Truslent 500₽ 📌2 место — слив старой женщины 100 звезд 📌3 место — яйцо об голову 200 руб (она мне помогала искать людей) Всем удачи в следующих разах!

10 Oct 2025, 19:20 UTC66 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @MELLSTROYEVSKI_SHOP

Победители, отпишите в лс)

10 Oct 2025, 19:16 UTC76 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @MELLSTROYEVSKI_SHOP

Кто наберет больше голосов будет победителем

10 Oct 2025, 18:37 UTC127 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @MELLSTROYEVSKI_SHOP

Просите друзей/знакомых

10 Oct 2025, 18:37 UTC55 viewsread 14 August 2026
Forwarded from @MELLSTROYEVSKI_SHOP

Кто наберет больше голосов будет победителем

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @archmellstroy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Oct 2025, 18:32 UTCFinal Results169 voters

Кто выигрывает пока

  1. Девочка с исламом4%
  2. Слив старой женщины30%
  3. Стойка на голове2%
  4. Яйцо об голову27%
  5. Меллстрой испанец бала = любовь34%
  6. Привет мелу от мамы2%
  7. Кошка1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 10 October 2025 to 10 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Архив меллстрой” (@archmellstroy), 2 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/archmellstroy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.