Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐ŸคฉุฃุฑุดูŠู ุฑูˆุงูŠุงุช ูˆู‚ุตุต ู…ู…ูŠุฒุฉ ๐Ÿ˜

@archiveRQM

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Telegram's recommendations ยท Cite this entry

7,527subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 3,162โ€“10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001302317107
TypeChannel
Username@archiveRQM
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/archiveRQM

Growth

7,5217,5277,5245 August 2026 โ€” 7,526 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 7,526 subscribers6 August 2026 โ€” 7,525 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 7,521 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 7,527 subscribers5 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 7,520โ€“7,528 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:537,527+6
9 Aug 2026, 23:337,521-4
6 Aug 2026, 23:077,525-1
6 Aug 2026, 03:067,526no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:017,526first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 9 September 2022 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
0.226%
avg views รท 7,527 subscribers
Avg views / post
17.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
โ€”
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
2
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held22 (9 September 2022 โ€“ 12 August 2026)
Views total34
Reactions totalโ€”
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 17:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

618 reactions across 18 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ‘29347.4%
โค25741.6%
๐Ÿ”ฅ203.24%
๐ŸŽ‰132.10%
๐Ÿคฉ132.10%
๐Ÿ‘Ž101.62%
๐Ÿ˜ฑ101.62%
๐Ÿ˜10.162%
๐Ÿ˜ข10.162%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 618reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2022 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 17:03 UTC13 viewsread 12 August 2026

๐Ÿ’ป ยฆยฆ ุนู€ู€ู€ุงู„ู€ู€ู€ู€ู… ุงู„ุชู‚ู†ูŠู€ู€ู€ุฉ๐Ÿ“ฑ : T.me/programmerst ๐Ÿ˜ ยฆยฆ ู‡ู†ุง ุณุชู‚ุฑุฃ ูƒู„ุงู…ุง ูŠุณุงูˆูŠ ุฐู‡ุจุงู‹ : T.me/samo_buy ๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€ ยฆยฆ ู„ู€ ูุชุงุฉ ู„ุทูŠูู‡ ุชู†ุดุฑ ูŠูˆู…ูŠุงุชู‡ุง : https://t.me/beautifel_girl -----------------------------------โ™ฅ------ ๐Ÿ‘โ€๐Ÿ—จ ู„ู€ู€ ุฅุถุงูุฉ ู‚ู†ุงุชูƒ ๐Ÿ”ธBy @unionlist

8 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC21 viewsread 8 August 2026

๐Ÿ’ป ยฆยฆ ุนู€ู€ู€ุงู„ู€ู€ู€ู€ู… ุงู„ุชู‚ู†ูŠู€ู€ู€ุฉ๐Ÿ“ฑ : T.me/programmerst ๐Ÿ˜ ยฆยฆ ู‡ู†ุง ุณุชู‚ุฑุฃ ูƒู„ุงู…ุง ูŠุณุงูˆูŠ ุฐู‡ุจุงู‹ : T.me/samo_buy ๐Ÿ‘ฑโ€โ™€ ยฆยฆ ู„ู€ ูุชุงุฉ ู„ุทูŠูู‡ ุชู†ุดุฑ ูŠูˆู…ูŠุงุชู‡ุง : https://t.me/beautifel_girl -----------------------------------โ™ฅ------ ๐Ÿ‘โ€๐Ÿ—จ ู„ู€ู€ ุฅุถุงูุฉ ู‚ู†ุงุชูƒ ๐Ÿ”ธBy @unionlist

6 Jun 2026, 16:24 UTCโ‰ˆ5,160 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

๐Ÿ’ž ุฎูˆุงุทุฑ ุฑุงู‚ู€ูŠุฉ๐Ÿ˜ ูˆุฑุณุงุฆู„ ุฌู…ูŠู„ุฉ๐ŸŒน https://t.me/joinchat/O44M7ys8WGM2ODBi

โค3

24 Aug 2025, 08:19 UTCโ‰ˆ23,800 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @storykaligiPhoto

๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ ๐Ÿ“– ุฑูˆุงูŠุฉ ๐Ÿ–‹ ... ุงู„ู‡ูˆู‰ ู„ุง ุฏุงุนุจ ุงู„ุบุตู† ุญู† ูˆู…ุงู„ ๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ .. ุงู„ูƒุงุชุจุฉ ุงู„ู…ุชุฃู„ู‚ุฉ : ุฒูŠู†ุจ ( ุญุจ ุŒ ู‚ุชู„ ุŒ ุณุญุฑ ุŒ ุฃู„ู… ุŒ ุฏุฑุงู…ุง ุŒ ูˆูุงุก ุŒ ุชุฎุทูŠุท ุŒ ูุฑุงู‚ ุŒ ุฎูŠุจุงุช ุฃู…ู„ ุŒ ู…ูƒุงุฆุฏ ุŒ ู†ู‡ุงูŠุฉ ุณุนูŠุฏุฉ ) . @storykaligi ๐Ÿ“–

โค31๐Ÿคฉ2๐ŸŽ‰1

19 Sept 2024, 07:02 UTCโ‰ˆ49,100 views76 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @storykaligiPhoto

๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ ๐Ÿ“– ุฑูˆุงูŠุฉ ๐Ÿ–‹ ... ุญุจ ุฃุญูŠุง ู‚ู„ุจ ุงู„ุฐูŠุงุจ ๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ .. ุงู„ูƒุงุชุจุฉ ุงู„ู…ุชุฃู„ู‚ุฉ : ุณู…ุงุญ ุงู„ุนูˆุงุถูŠ ( ุญุจ ุŒ ู‚ุชู„ ุŒ ุณุญุฑ ุŒ ุฃู„ู… ุŒ ุฏุฑุงู…ุง ุŒ ูˆูุงุก ุŒ ุชุฎุทูŠุท ุŒ ูุฑุงู‚ ุŒ ุฎูŠุจุงุช ุฃู…ู„ ุŒ ู†ู‡ุงูŠุฉ ุณุนูŠุฏุฉ ) . @storykaligi ๐Ÿ“–

โค46๐Ÿ‘28๐Ÿ˜1๐Ÿ˜ข1

2 Sept 2024, 20:04 UTCโ‰ˆ40,900 views51 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

ุงู„ู€ู€ุฑูˆุงูŠู€ู€{ }ู€ุฉ 4โƒฃ6โƒฃ ุฑูˆุงูŠู€ู€ู€ู€ู€๐Ÿ“™ู€ู€ู€ู€ู€ุฉ : ู…ุงู„ูŠ ูˆุทู† ููŠ ู†ุฌุฏ ุงู„ุง ูˆุทู†ู‡ุง ุงู„ูƒุง๐Ÿ–Œุชุจุฉ : ุฃุฏูŠู… ุงู„ุฑุงุดุฏ ๐Ÿ‘โ€๐Ÿ—จ ุนู€ุฏุฏ ุจุงุฑุชุงุช ุงู„ู€ุฑูˆุงูŠู€ุฉ : 2โƒฃ3โƒฃ0โƒฃ @archiveRQM

โค40๐Ÿ‘7๐Ÿคฉ3๐Ÿ˜ฑ1

2 Sept 2024, 20:02 UTCโ‰ˆ32,900 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

โค4

2 Sept 2024, 20:02 UTCโ‰ˆ30,100 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

โค2

2 Sept 2024, 20:00 UTCโ‰ˆ32,300 views16 reactionsread 12 August 2026
File

6โƒฃ3โƒฃ ๐ŸŒผ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ ๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ ๐Ÿƒ ๐ŸŒบ ุฑูˆุงูŠู€ู€๐Ÿ“”ู€ู€ุฉ / #ุจุงู„ู‡ูˆู†_ูŠุง_ุฌุฏู‡_ุนู„ู‰_ู†ุงูŠู ๐ŸŒบ ุงู„ู€ู€ู€ูƒู€ู€๐Ÿ–Œู€ุงุชู€ู€ุจู€ู€ุฉ : ุฑูŠู…ุง ๐ŸŒบ ุนุฏุฏ ุงู„ุตูู€ู€๐Ÿ“– ู€ู€ุญุงุช : 1819 ๐Ÿ“ ๐Ÿƒ๐Ÿ“š t.me/archiveRQM ๐Ÿ“š ๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ ๐ŸŒผ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ

โค8๐Ÿ‘6๐Ÿ”ฅ2

2 Sept 2024, 19:57 UTCโ‰ˆ29,700 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

โค2๐Ÿ‘1

2 Sept 2024, 19:56 UTCโ‰ˆ38,000 views22 reactionsread 12 August 2026

6โƒฃ3โƒฃ ู€๐ŸŒผ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ ู€๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ ู€๐ŸŒบ๐Ÿƒ๐ŸŒธ ู€๐Ÿƒ #ุฑูˆุงุจุท_ุงู„ุฑูˆุงูŠุฉ_ุงู„ุซุงู„ุซุฉ_ูˆุงู„ุณุชูˆู† ู„ุฑูˆุงูŠุงุช ูˆู‚ุตุต ุงู„ู‚ู†ุงุฉ ๐Ÿ’ซ ุฑูˆุงูŠู€ู€๐Ÿ“”ู€ู€ุฉ / ุจุงู„ู‡ูˆู† ูŠุง ุฌุฏุฉ ุนู„ู‰ ู†ุงูŠู ุชุฑุงู‡ ูˆู‚ุน ุจุญุจ ู†ูˆุฑู‡ ๐ŸŒผ ุงู„ู€ู€ู€ูƒู€ุงุชู€ุจู€ู€ู€ุฉ / ุฑูŠู…ุง ... 1. ุงู„ุจุงุฑุช ุฑู‚ู… 1 https://t.me/storykaligi/67875 2. ุงู„ุจุงุฑุช ุฑู‚ู… 16 https://t.me/storykaligi/67914 3. ุงู„ุจุงุฑุช ุฑู‚ู… 31 https://t.me/storykaligi/67943 4. ุงู„ุจุงุฑุช ุฑู‚ู… 51 https://t.me/storykaligi/67982 5. ุงู„ุจุงุฑุช ุฑู‚ู… 66 https://t.me/storykaligi/68016 6. ุงู„ุจโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ‘12โค8๐Ÿ‘Ž1๐Ÿ˜ฑ1

2 Sept 2024, 19:54 UTCโ‰ˆ21,800 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

๐Ÿ‘5

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @archiveRQM. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 927,890 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegramโ€™s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly โ€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone elseโ€™s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ุฎู„ุทุงุช ุทุจูŠู‡ ุทุจูŠุนูŠู‡ ุŒ ูˆุตูุงุช ๐Ÿ’
@wsafat ยท 151,161
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here โ€” alongside 83 others โ€” read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegramโ€™s list for THAT channel, not this one โ€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐ŸคฉุฃุฑุดูŠู ุฑูˆุงูŠุงุช ูˆู‚ุตุต ู…ู…ูŠุฒุฉ ๐Ÿ˜โ€ (@archiveRQM), 7,527 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/archiveRQM.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.