Channel
@archique
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
589subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 26 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003682182461 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @archique |
| Created | 2 January 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 26 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/archique |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 11:55 | 589 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 588 | no change |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 588 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 January 2026 – 26 August 2026) |
| Views total | 957 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 26 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
4 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Boleeh banget! So ini kan first order ku yaachh, aku gak ngerti kenapa dengan harga se-affordable ini hasilnya sangatt amaatt ok omgg!! Dan resonate banget, paraahh😭 menjawab semua pertanyaan yang selama inii ada di kepala ku, dan bikin lebih legaa deh hasil bacaannya. Terus kamu juga ramah syekalii, pembawaannya enak jugaa, dan yang pasti hasilnya memuaskan dehh. Akan kuu ambil yang positif positifnya byy! Dari akuu…
❤1
love, personal growth, energy checks, and general readings are all open today! reach out to t.me/mystchic for questions or bookings. 💌
#helenadecodes hi ash! kalian udah tau belum kalo sekarang lagi masuk Hungry Ghost Month? basically, di tradisi kalender lunar Chinese, bulan ke-7 itu dipercaya sebagai momen pas gerbang alam gaib kebuka lebar selama sebulan penuh. contohnya kayak arwah yang belum tenang dikasih 'izin' buat ke dunia manusia. puncaknya sendiri ada di tengah bulan (bulan purnama), yang biasa disebut Festival Zhongyuan / Hungry Ghost F…
📝 got something on your mind? drop your questions softly, i’ll answer as honestly as i can. 👥 0 people have voted so far. 📖 Anonymous Board
#helenadecodes entering this space brings heavy vibes of clearing through static to claim a total win, things feel a bit noisy at first, but potential stays super bright when staying centered. starting with endless noise or competing opinions only sharpens focus.. right beside that chaos sits purely radiant energy: a green light for money, career, and success as clarity and abundance flow in. holding onto this gr…
ㅤㅤ Halo monies! @Moneyfess sedang mencari admin magang nih! Untuk mengurus dan memajukan MoneyFess. Jika kamu berminat menjadi salah satu admin @Moneyfess, kamu bisa mendaftarkan dirimu! Sebelum itu, silahkan dibaca terlebih dahulu rulesnya ya! 𖥔MONEYFESS HIRING INTERNS𖥔 ◖RULES◗ 𐀏 Pastikan kamu sudah subscribe @MoneyFess @MoneyFessCS @MoneyFessLaw @DaftarHitam…
hi lovey! first off, i’m so sorry for being MIA and slow to reply lately—real life has been crazy hectic on my end. i really appreciate everyone who waited so patiently ♥✨ quick heads up that normal reading slots are fully OPEN again, for the updated pricelist, you can check out directly here: [https://t.me/archique/15?single] proof: [https://t.me/aarchique] lastly, endless love to everyone who’s placed an order, e…
List reader yg bisa kalian kunjungin selain aku and bunch of them are my close friends: @shapedpentagon @amourubie @infernalgate @solthbeam @chornovar @aceofthemoon @fraisiier @tarotbybibi @folklorn @Darlmise @ayumioracleshop
hii, masih available. last day 🫶🏻
☾ greetings, lovely souls! ready to unlock the secrets the universe has in store for you? whether it’s love, career, or general guidance, my deck is ready to provide the clarity you need. I am running a special flash sale from April 28th until May 10th! don’t miss this chance to gain deeper insights at these exclusive rates. Deep Reading: IDR 35.000 you can choose one question that you are thinking about or an impor…
kalo aku udah kasih payment details, atau udah confirm mau gimananya tapi tiba-tiba cancel and then ngilang gitu aja, aku anggap hit and run ya. unless kalian cancel dengan reason yang jelas, it’s fine. tapi please paham kalo aku jawabin details questions kalian before order itu juga makan waktu, jadi gabisa cancel seenaknya aja. tolong banget untuk lebih respect sama seller and be a wise buyer.
❤2
anyway maaf yaa tmn-tmn, ini channel baru ku :[ channel yang lama udah ada pemilik baru, jadi maaf kalo channel nya kayak ga meyakinkan. ♥
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @archique. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,349,020 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@archique named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“archique open daily.☾” (@archique), 589 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/archique.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.